On 11 August 2009, Britain's Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, appeared on Radio 4's 'Great Lives' to pay tribute to his own choice of a 'great life,' Jo Slovo.
Lithuanian immigrant, Yossel Mashel Slovo, was the long time head of the South African Communist Party and sometime leader of Umkhonto we Sizwe, the military wing of the African National Congress. He, along with Nelson Mandela, was responsible for commissioning terrorist acts against the apartheit regime in South Africa.
Slovo was a close friend of Miliband's father, Ralph. Miliband snr was the leading academic authority on Marxist theory in this country for many years and he and Slovo shared a passionate belief in the righteousness of Marxist ideology.
Don't you find it interesting that our former Foreign Secretary felt politically secure enough to parade his own far-left sympathies so ostentatiously? I mean, he chose to eulogise, on BBC Radio 4 no less, a man who was both a terrorist and a Communist!
At one point, Matthew Parris, the presenter of 'Great Lives,' asked Miliband whether there were any circumstances in which terrorism was justified. This was his reply:
"YES, THERE ARE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT IS JUSTIFIABLE, AND YES, THERE ARE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT IS EFFECTIVE."Pretty categoric don't you think? A second-generation Jewish immigrant who, at one point, seemed all set to be the next Labour Prime Minister, thinks that some terrorism is 'justifiable' and 'effective!'
In which case, if some horrid, Boer revolutionaries got fed up with all the black-on-white nastiness that’s been the norm in South Africa ever since the Slovo/Mandela faction took over, and took it into their heads to begin terrorising Lithuanian Jews, that would be OK would it? I mean, a Lithuanian Jew was the ‘Chief of Staff of the armed wing of the ANC,' (as Miliband so enthusiastically put it several times during the broadcast) wasn't he?
And if some equally disgusting pro-British anti-Semites began terrorising New Labour Jews like Dave for inflicting immigrant and banker-hugging, Brownite and Blairite philosophies upon us for thirteen long years, that would be OK too, would it?
And if the same anti-Semitic bunch decided to terrorise Polish Jews for breeding up a bloke who spent his life teaching two whole generations of credulous, Blair/Brown-type university students to despise their own kind and worship at the altar of the German Jew, Karl Marx, instead, that would be just lovely, would it?
Or is terrorism only 'justifiable' when the Milibands, Slovos and Marxes, and whoever happen to be their best pals at the time, are doing the terrorising?
I think we all know the answer to that one.
Check out Ralph Miliband, Nelson Mandela and the Rainbow Nation and Racist (from 11.06).
On 5 September 2007, two months after Gordon Brown promoted him to the post of Foreign Secretary, Miliband delivered a speech which he titled ‘Shared Values and Shared Future: The Importance Of Turkey To Our Common Future’ at Bahcesehir University, Istanbul.
This, in part, is it:
“It makes no sense for the EU to be defined as a closed Christian club. Its membership must demonstrate that diversity of religious beliefs is compatible with common values, and common institutions... AN OUTWARD LOOKING EU NEEDS AS A CLEAR GOAL THE POSITION OF TURKEY AS A FULL AND EQUAL MEMBER. Turkey and the rest of Europe are bound together by a shared belief in democracy and by shared interests. Membership of the European Union will help to further those shared interests and values and reconcile differences...
Every time the European Union has enlarged, it has emerged stronger – more confident, more capable. Britain joined with Ireland and Denmark in 1973 – and the EU became stronger. Then Greece in 1981. Then Spain and Portugal. More recently a historic shift to include 12 new members from central and eastern Europe.
Each time the EU has become more able to deliver the security and prosperity to its members, more able, because rather than despite of its diversity, to reach out and influence change beyond its borders. It will be the same story with Turkey... ALL CITIZENS OF THE EU WILL BENEFIT FROM TURKEY’S MEMBERSHIP, WHICH WILL BRING THE STRENGTH OF DIVERSITY UNITED BY SHARED VALUES…
My position is clear: the EU must keep its promises and encourage the process of negotiations to run its course… Technical discussions on Turkey’s accession will continue... and the UK will work with other member states to ensure the process moves ahead…
We are building a common future… If Turkey can play a role as a member of the European Union, engaged in shared projects, promoting shared values, the prize for Turkey, for Britain and for Europe as a whole is immense: to witness an age where the world is not just more connected, and more interdependent, but more equal in terms of power, wealth and opportunity, more at ease between the different identities that Turkey bridges, and as a result, more secure. The prize is worth fighting for.”
On 27 July 2010, at a press conference in the Turkish Parliament, David Cameron said that a European Union without Turkey at its heart would be 'not stronger but weaker... not more secure but less... not richer but poorer.'
He added:
"IT MAKES ME ANGRY THAT YOUR PROGRESS TOWARDS EU MEMBERSHIP CAN BE FRUSTRATED IN THE WAY IT HAS BEEN… I'M HERE TO MAKE THE CASE FOR TURKEY'S MEMBERSHIP OF THE EU. AND TO FIGHT FOR IT… This is something I feel very passionately about… Together, I WANT US TO PAVE THE ROAD FROM ANKARA TO BRUSSELS…You know, the two Daves are never going to have to live in Slough. The Camerons will always have their castles and their mansions and the Milbands will have their gated communities and, at worst, their leafy suburbs to protect them from the alien hordes. They will never have to suffer being put to the back of the council housing queue because a Turkish family of ten 'needs' a home more than you do. Nor will they ever have to suffer the depredations of the Turkish criminals lining up to partake of the easy pickings on offer over here. Oh no, the threadbare communities of the indigenous working-classes will be the first port of call for this sort.
Europe is defined not by religion, but by values. The EU IS A SECULAR ORGANIZATION. And EUROPE WELCOMES PEOPLE OF ALL FAITHS, OR NONE… I WILL REMAIN YOUR STRONGEST POSSIBLE ADVOCATE FOR EU MEMBERSHIP AND GREATER INFLUENCE AT THE TOP TABLE OF EUROPEAN DIPLOMACY…
THE PREJUDICED, those who wilfully misunderstand Islam, they see no difference between real Islam and the distorted version of the extremists. They think the problem is Islam itself. And they think the values of Islam can just never be compatible with the values of other religions, societies or cultures. ALL OF THESE ARGUMENTS ARE JUST PLAIN WRONG. And as a new government in Britain, I WANT US TO BE AT THE FOREFRONT OF AN INTERNATIONAL EFFORT TO DEFEAT THEM…
PEOPLE MUST FLOW IN BOTH DIRECTIONS!"
You see, that’s where their kith-and-kin amongst the 'family-of-ten' types are already well established. It will be the British working-classes who will be expected, as always, to bear the brunt of the disenfranchisement, demotion and despair that the opportunistic foreign self-server will visit upon our country. Courtesy of the Daves of this world who imported them.
Anyway, David Cameron, just like New Labour's former Foreign Secretary and Jo Slovo fan, wants the Turks in the EU. And, once the Turks are in, millions of them will be on the first Easyjet over here, you can be sure of that. And woe betide the 'prejudiced' who 'wilfully misunderstand' the Turkish hordes when they move in next door, after having had the 'road from Ankara to Brussels' paved for them by the 'top table.' They’d be 'just plain wrong,' you see. And the Daves would be 'at the forefront of the international effort to defeat them.'
'Them' being us, of course. That’s who the Camerons and the Milibands want defeated. Those of us who may, once in a while, think 'the problem IS Islam itself.' Those of us who don’t want the 'real Islam' of the prophet Mohammed, a paedophile who married one of his brides when she was six years old and took her virginity when she was nine, forced upon us.
You see, a goodly percentage of the Muslim faithful think there was a halo around the helmet of their top prophet and they would not, under any circumstances, criticise the behaviour cited above. Even if they didn’t agree with paedophilia. Because it was Mohammed, 'blessings be upon him,' playing the paedophile. So that’s alright then.
And the Daves want even more Mohammed fans over here? And they want to 'defeat' any 'arguments' that would prevent them coming?
You really couldn’t make it up, could you? And, of course, some of those who arrive will, indeed, be 'extremists.' Do you think Dave C will ever apologise if some Turkish 'extremist' blows a few more of us up some time in the future? Tony Blair never apologised to us for what one West Indian and three second-generation Pakistani Muslims did on 7/7/2005, now did he? Nor did any of the other 'Europe welcomes people of all faiths' Anglophobes within Westminster.
What do you think the mothers and fathers of all the little girls who've been drugged up, gang raped and prostituted in recent times by Mohammed's non-extremist followers would have to say about the sentiments of these elite politicians?
PS. One of David Cameron’s great-great-granddads, a German financier by the name of Emile Levita, who was related to the all-powerful Goldsmid banking family, was a Jewish immigrant.
David (and Ed) Miliband are also the sons of Jewish immigrants. Father Ralph was an unreconstructed Marxist. As were Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Jo Slovo, Nelson Mandela et al. Along the way, the 'angry' gentlemen cited above 'defeated' lots and lots and lots of 'extremists' who didn’t want such 'internationalist' types presiding over their national 'tent.'
In fact, during the course of the twentieth century, around two hundred million, mostly innocent, 'extremists' lost their lives as a direct result of the desire of these 'international effort' folk to 'defeat' them. And all because they were 'just plain wrong.'
PPS. Karl Marx and Leon Trotsky were also Jewish.
It’s not easy sticking up for the British when the 'democrats' at both ends of the 'top table' don’t give a damn about what the majority want. It’s harder still when the majority-in-the-middle keep on voting for them.
In March 2013, David Miliband let it be known that he was quitting as an MP in order to take up the post of head of a powerful, New York based charity, the International Rescue Committee.
This organisation was originally set up in the thirties by Miliband's fellow Jew, Albert Einstein, to assist those fleeing Hitler.
At first glance one might imagine ge would have less chance to impose the Jewish version of wonderland upon us when he's gone. But then, they have his brother in situe ready to take up the reins when a LabLib coalition takes over from the current establishment love-in.
And, who knows, maybe at some point in the near future the powers-that-be will have us doff the cap to the IRC, in the same way we do now with the Human Rights brigade. If that happens, Miliband D. will perfectly placed to impose whatever quota of rescued foreigners upon us that he deems appropriate.
Won't he?
i didn't understand the "jew" point.
ReplyDeletecameron is a jew?
u blame the communism for the MC and the jews invented communism so the jews r to blame at england current situation?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteCameron isn't a Jew but one of his most powerful ancestors was.
ReplyDeleteHe is also Jew-led, as are most of the leading politicians in the Western world. The Jewish lobby owns their treacherous behinds.
The Blair government was, as well as being onside in the capitalist world, (as, of course, are the Tories) where so many Jewish bankers thrive, very Marxist, very proscriptive in its outlook.
"Spin", mass immigration, social engineering, race laws that bore down upon the indigenous population ever more furiously, political correctness and the racist calumny used liberally against anyone who disagreed with their foreigner-first policies, were the order of the day.
Cameron's ConDems, whilst not so messianically anti-British, have not turned back the pages to a Brit-favouring time.
i) Marxist control favours spin/propaganda/management of the news to the facts. Cultural Marxism, which would, along the way, morph into political correctness, was invented at the Frankfurt School in 1923 and propagated thereafter by Jewish personages.
ii) The Jewish Board of British Deputies played no small part in the introduction and formulation of every race law now on the UK's statute books.
iii) Relentless aren't-foreigners-wonderful-aren't-we-awful propaganda via Jew-owned media.
iv) Mass immigration = Jews have championed this in the West.
v) Political correctness = Jews invented it.
(vi) World-wide recession = Jewish bankers.
vii) Race law = Jews at forefront of its introduction.
viii) "Racist" calumny = invented by Trotsky and spread by Hirschfeld, Gollancz and the Cultural Marxists.
And then there was Iraq. An unwanted, unnecessary, vastly expensive and slaughterous war which the US Neocons forced upon the word with the help of Tony B, New Labour and all but 16 Tories.
The vast majority of leading Neocons are Jewish.