Friday, 27 March 2015

THE ANTI-SEMITISM SCAM (Part 5)

Since he became the President of the European Jewish Congress in 2007, Moshe Kantor has been busy trying to drum up extra privileges for his Jewish brethren.

For example, on 16 May 2012, The Washington Post quoted him thus:
“Before calling on European leaders to act against hate on the street, they must clear their own house and that means BANNING AND OSTRACISING ANY POLITICIANS AND POLITICAL PARTIES THAT PREACH HATE AND VIOLENCE. While we highly value freedom of speech, we all recognise that there must be restrictions and the visceral hatred propagated by the Golden Dawn is surely outside the boundaries of appropriate political discourse. WE HAVE TO BE PROACTIVE… That’s why we’re here.”
 The Post added:
“A major European Jewish organization is urging European governments to quickly adopt measures to tackle anti-Semitism and far-right extremism, including possibly BANNING A HARDLINE GREEK PARTY THAT DID UNUSUALLY WELL IN RECENT ELECTIONS.

Moshe Kantor, President of the European Jewish Congress, was meeting with Czech Prime Minister Petr Necas on Wednesday to seek his support for ‘emergency measures’ to protect the continent’s Jewish communities from violent hate crimes... Kantor expressed concern about Golden Dawn, a party that did well during Greece’s May 6 election and whose leader claimed that Nazi concentration camps did not use ovens and gas chambers to kill prisoners during the Holocaust.

Kantor plans to meet with EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, and the congress consulted with Francois Hollande a few weeks before he was elected president of France.”
Democracy, eh? Democracy as long as it suit’s the Jew. Then it’s 'ban' and 'ostracise.' I entered this comment under the article:
"Before calling on European leaders to act against hate on the street, they must clear their own house and that means banning and ostracising any politicians and political parties that preach hate and violence.'

'Hate on the street?' What about the 'hate on the street' directed at Whitey by the immigrant, Moshe? What about the 'hate' in the banker's boardrooms that created this latest world-wide recession? What about hateful anti-White propaganda in the mainsteam media? What about the evil that is political correctness? Chutzpah is one thing, Moshe. Genocide is another.

The powers-that-be thought they could subdue us in the lands that our fathers made and, for a while there, they were right. But, unless and until they get rid of us altogether, there will always be brave men and women willing to fight back against the malign creed and rule of the supremacists. Has the habitual dominance of these people rendered tham so stupid that they're not able to see what would happen if the Jew was seen to ban a democratically formed and elected, pro-indigenous party in Europe?

You've gotten way too big for your boots over the course of this last cosmetically Judaeophilic century, Moshe. You would be well advised to back off for a bit. Your media, financial and political power has tipped the balance until now but, if you try to 'ban and ostracise' those democrats who oppose you for simply exerting their democratic will, you will, I'm sure, reap the whirlwind."
No one replied.

Here's a recent timeline of the Golden Dawn movement:

In November 2005, Golden Dawn's offices were attacked by with gunfire, molotov cocktails and stones. Two people were injured. Three suspects were arrested but these were subsequently released without charge.

In March 2010, a bomb was detonated in the Golden Dawn office in Athens.

In June 2012, Golden Dawn received seven percent of the vote in the Greek elections, enough for the party to enter the Hellenic Parliament for the first time with 21 seats.

In December 2012, a bomb exploded at a Golden Dawn's office building in Aspropyrgos, a suburb of Athens.

In February 2013 a bomb exploded in Golden Dawn’s Piraeus office.

On 28 March 2013, The Jewish Chronicle reported thus:
"At the recent World Jewish Congress Executive Committee meeting in Thessaloniki in northern Greece attended by Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras... WJC President Ronald Lauder said that Golden Dawn was a 'a threat to democracy' and called them the 'new Nazis'...

In response, a post on Golden Dawn’s New York-based blog ‘Xaameriki’ called for a boycott of a list of cosmetic companies owned by Estee Lauder, which is owned by the Lauder family of which Ronald Lauder is a member…
Maram Stern, deputy secretary-general of the WJC, said: 'To announce a boycott of ‘Jewish’ companies a few days before the 80th anniversary of the first organised boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany by the Nazi government, on 1 April 1933, shows the true face of Golden Dawn. Both in words and in actions these fanatics behave like the Nazis did 80 years ago.
Once again, this is a reminder that they need to be opposed vigorously by all democratic forces, not just in Greece but everywhere they operate'.”
So, the World Jewish Congress calls for a legitimate political party, popular with those who have suffered most at the hands of the international financiers, to be banned because it isn't prepared to toe the 'democratic' party line favoured by a similar elite body. Responding in kind, Golden Dawn calls for a ban on Estée Lauder products. Ronald Lauder, current head of the WJC, being the heir to the Lauder fortune.

The deputy secretary-general of the WJC then plays the nasty Nazi card, complaining that the counter ban is redolent 'of the first organised boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany.'

In other words, ladies and gents, the Jew can call for an entirely legitimate Greek political party to be banned but the Greeks who are thus threatened cannot then call for a range of cosmetics to be treated similarly.

Instead of telling these jumped-up non-Greek finger-waggers where to go, the Greek Prime Minister was cowed by the implied threat and, subsequently, promised to enact legislation 'completely intolerant to violence and racism.' National governments had to 'be very careful not to let them (Neo-Nazis) gain ground as they did in the 1930s,' he said.

Democracy in the western world doesn't mean what you think it means. It means whatever the Ronald Lauders, the Maram Sterns and their bought Prime Ministers want it to mean.

On 17 March 2013, at a World Jewish Conference in Thessaloniki, Greece, the following was said:
"The Executive Committee of the World Jewish Congress... notes with alarm the growing expressions of anti-Semitism and the rise of the extremist and violently racist Chrysi Avgi (Golden Dawn) movement, which has parliamentary representation…

Urges the Greek authorities to: take serious and concerted actions against Holocaust denial, anti-Semitism, racism and xenophobia; implement all relevant European laws in that domain; and unite all democratic forces against the enemies of democracy, so as not to allow society to drift into the darkness of racial hatred and anti-Semitism.

Calls on Greece to consider BANNING POLITICAL PARTIES, such as the Golden Dawn movement, which pose a serious danger to liberal democracy; calls on the European Union to ensure that political movements that actively espouse a platform of discrimination of ethnic or religious minorities, in contravention of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, are dealt with in a coordinated manner in all EU member states."
In September 2013, anti-Fascist rapper, Pavlos Fyssas, aka Killah P, was killed following an argument over a football match in Athens. 

After it was discovered that the man who killed him, Giorgos Roupakias was a Golden Dawn member, the police raided their offices in Athens and, on 28 September 2013, party leader, Nikolaos Michaloliakos, was arrested, along with several other leading members, and charged with 'forming a criminal organization.'

On 1 November 2013, Golden Dawn members Giorgos Fountoulis and Manos Kapelonis were shot dead and Alexandros Gerontas was severely injured outside the party's offices in Athens. Although the police described it as a ‘terrorist’ attack, Golden Dawn claimed that police protection of the building had been withdrawn shortly beforehand.

Two weeks later, a previously unknown anarchist group calling itself the ‘Fighting People's Revolutionary Powers’ claimed responsibility for the ‘political executions of the Fascist members of the neo-Nazi Golden Dawn party.’

In December 2013, The European Jewish Congress presented Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras with an award for his government’s support of a ban on Golden Dawn.

On 25 January 2015, the Greek General Election took place. Left-wing party SYRIZA won 149 out of the 300 seats. The ruling New Democracy party lost 53 seats. PASOK, New Democracy's coalition partner, was reduced to just 13 seats, losing 20.

Despite all the intimidation and the ongoing imprisonment of its leading lights, Golden Dawn became the third force in Greek politics with 17 seats.

In March 2015, all of those arrested in September 2013 were released, prior to a trial which may or may not take place in April.

If you want to know how impartial (or otherwise) the media really is nowadays, type the name of murdered rapper ‘Pavlos Fyssas’ into Google’s search engine along with the phrase ‘The Guardian.’ (i.e. ‘Pavlos Fyssas’ ‘The Guardian’)

How many hits do you get?

I got 62,600.

Now type the names of the murdered Golden Dawn members ‘Giorgos Fountoulis’ and ‘Manos Kapelonis’ into Google along with ‘The Guardian.’ i.e. (‘Giorgos Fountoulis’ ‘Manos Kapelonis’ ‘The Guardian’) How many hits do you get this time?

I got 621. In other words, The Guardian/‘Nazi’ combo appears one hundred times less than the Guardian/'rapper' combo.

Now try the same thing with The Daily Mail. When I did this I got 243 for the Golden Dawn lads and 13,400 for Pavlos Fyssas. Try this with the BBC and you get 694 for Golden Dawn and 11,300 for the anti-Fascist.

That should give you a bit of a clue as to how much more the mainstream British media (and that of the West in general) wants you to sympathise with a self-proclaimed Communist and than it does the deaths of two Greek Nationalists.

Now do the same thing (‘Giorgos Fountoulis’ and ‘Manos Kapelonis’ then ‘Pavlos Fyssas’ with Greek Prime Minister at the time of the killings, Antonis Samaras.

You get 37,200 hits for Pavlos Fyssas and just 300 for the Golden Dawn duo.

Try it with Moshe Kantor and Ronald Lauder.

Moshe = 307 for the rapper and just ONE, that’s ONE for Giorgos and Manos. Ronald = 429 v 2.

In my book this rates as a ‘COVER-UP.’ You know, a bit like the Rotherham and Westminster child abuse cover-ups? They want you to know, and thus be thinking about, one thing and they don’t want you know and think about the other. So the one thing gets publicised and the other doesn’t.

Simple.

After the Charlie Hebdo and kosher grocery killings in Paris, on 27 January 2015 Moshe Kantor said this at another conference organised by the European Jewish Congress and the Czech government in Prague:
“Recent atrocities in Paris, Brussels and Toulouse are visible manifestations of the deep structural problems embodied in European society today. This, coupled with the continuing electoral successes of extremist parties in Europe, demonstrated in recent elections across the continent, shows that unfortunately, Europe is on a dangerous path…

In the immediate term, intelligence-gathering and sharing across Europe must increase… Police and law enforcement also need to be strengthened. This includes actively enforcing laws against incitement and anti-Semitic speech and taking a firmer approach against those who promote hate and violence."
After Binyamin Netanyahu's election victory, Kantor said this at the EJC website:
“Israel and the Jewish communities of Europe share, not just a common history, religion and culture, but also a united position against many of today's challenges, which include religious fundamentalism, anti-Semitism and the Iranian nuclear threat.”
Nice to know you and the Israeli genocide-merchants are singing from the same hymn sheet, Moshe.

28 January 2015, the BBC told us this:
"Theresienstadt was a transit camp where some 150,000 Jews, mostly Czech, languished for months or years before being sent on to their deaths at Auschwitz or Treblinka...

This year, Terezin hosted a special commemorative event, the culmination of a two-day international conference in Prague on anti-Semitism and extremism, organised by the European Jewish Congress... The EJC wants Europe to move beyond acts of solemn commemoration, towards TANGIBLE CHANGES IN LEGISLATION IN EVERY EUROPEAN COUNTRY, to protect Jews not just from classical anti-Semitism or an increasingly MAINSTREAM NEO-NAZI MOVEMENT, but also the threat of Islamist radicalism...

The EJC has spent the last four years drawing up what it calls a 'European Framework Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance.' Mr Kantor wants every parliament in Europe to adopt it (which is why three dozen heads of parliament were invited to Prague)... The idea is to go further than the existing anti-racism legislation, enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights...

Civil libertarians will gasp at the proposals... Wearing a full-face veil would essentially be a criminal offence in every European country, as would denying the Holocaust."
Well, I'm up for the face veil ban, such secrecy-enhancing costume ought not to be part of our world. It would never have been so if the 'three dozen heads of parliament' types hadn't imported the third world into ours against the will of the vast majority of Europe's indigenous inhabitants. As for 'denying the holocaust' becoming a criminal offence, it already is throughout much of Europe.

In 1997, the Labour MP, Mike Gapes, as on-message a pro-Semitic toady as its possible to find, tried to get such a law onto the statute books here. His bill failed, but only for lack of parliamentary time.

I wonder what 'denying the holocaust' will mean in Moshe Wonderland? Will it mean that anyone who says that less than six million died is committing a crime? If that was to be the case then the British government would be in the business of criminalising honest men and women in favour of those who have imposed an enormous 70-year lie upon the gullible majority.

Many Jews died during the course of World War II but six million did not. That statistic has been known to be false for a very long time now. And yet it is still being taught to schoolchildren throughout the western world. Getting close to an exact estimate of the number of Jewish dead at the hands of the Nazis is likely to remain, as long as the facts matter less than the myth, more a matter of luck than science. However, you can be sure that the actual figure is likely to be much closer to five hundred thousand than six million. Take a look at the YouTube video 'Secrets and Lies' for proof of this.


And yet, the Moshes appear to be intent on enshrining the six million lie in law here, just as they have elsewhere. Any MP who bows to the will of this self-serving alien minority in this matter will demonstrate that the myth is preferable to the actuality and the Jewish lie matters more than the truth of the honest Briton.

Ladies and gentlemen, let me be clear: anyone who conspires to see a 'Holocaust denial' law imposed upon the British people is a traitor. As previously stated, it is known that six million did NOT die. It is documented. Meticulous historians, many of them Jewish, have, for may years, rubbished the six million stat.

If this legislation comes before parliament (and it will - the Kantors and their parliamentary facilitators will see to it) you should let your MP know, in no uncertain terms, that you, and many others, will regard accession to this demand as an act of institutionalised treachery.

And such treachery will have consequences.

By 10 March 2015, Moshe was issuing direct threats.

Russia Today reported thus on that day:
"European leaders should be quick in adopting real measures to counter anti-Semitism or witness Jews leave, taking away their money and businesses, says the President of the European Jewish Congress...

'This minority is going in case authorities are not delivering some real, real stuff,' Kantor told Reuters. 'This minority is going to leave Europe, definitely'...

If Jews do it, that would trigger a serious economic crisis in Europe, Kantor warned.

'I think out of three million Jews that are living in Europe at least one million... are going to leave and it will be a disaster, an economic disaster for Europe in general because first of all some supporters, non-Jewish supporters will come with Jews. It's a lot of cash and money currents are going to leave Europe and also businesses,' he said.

He added that there is 'a strong demand from civil society to modify the legislation fighting against racism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism'."
No, Moshe, that's not true.

'Civil society' does not want more control ceded to those who would curtail our freedoms even more. It's only you and yours who want more prohibitive legislation inflicted upon the fractious European herd. I doubt even that the majority of the bought wagtails that infest the governmental systems of Europe would seriously want to go this route. They will know that the imposition of even more restrictive law upon the majority, just to make an eternally dissatisfied minority feel more comfortable, might well be a dangerous step too far.

As for your leaving, well, don't let us stop you, Moshe. Really, outside of the brown paper bag merchants in Westminster, most of us would happily swap your influence-purchasing billions for less law, less threat and more control of our own affairs.

So you, and any who feel the way you do, just go with our blessing. We got by without you once, we'll do so again. Honestly Moshe, you and your interminably self-serving demands will not be missed.

On 24 March 2015, Ronald Lauder said this to a Congressional Committee in Washington:
"Once again, like the 1930s, European Jews live in fear. The United States can and must speak loudly and clearly to condemn this evil for what it is, the radical Islamic hatred of Jews... To defeat this new flame of radical Islamic terror and survive... the United States must lead!"
Dan Asmussen, a Danish Jewish leader, said:
"Many of the threats facing Danish Jewry, like in the rest of Europe, come from marginalised and radicalised Muslims."
Roger Cukierman, a French Jewish leader, added:
"This is a war against Western modern civilization. And the Jews are seen by these Jihadists as a privileged target."
Well, lads, good luck with the anti-Islamic stuff. Unlike you lot we never wanted the third world pouring into our countries. For that matter we've never approved of the way you've slaughtered those minding their business in their own homeland either. The USA's Jewish Neocons and Israel's political leadership cannot say the same about Iraq and Palestine.

Here's the thing, whatever new laws you dream up to make yourselves immune to all that 'radical Islamic hatred of Jews' in Europe, just make sure they're aimed foursquare at 'marginalised and radicalised Muslims' and don't trap the rest of us in some indiscriminate catch-all dragnet.

When you clamour for 'changes in legislation... to protect Jews... from classical anti-Semitism or an increasingly mainstream neo-Nazi movement,' that better not be a cynical metaphor for the silencing of truth you don't want told and the patriot who tells it.

Guess what? It's all gone quiet over there again.

Forbes estimates Ronald Lauder's personal wealth at $3.9 billion. 

The same organisation tells us Moshe Kantor is worth a mere $2.1 billion. He made his pile during Russia’s particularly nasty variation on the privatisation scam. Along with a good few other similar types.

Israeli writer, Uri Avnery, informed us thus in his 3 August 2004 essay, 'The Oligarchs:'

"The 'oligarchs' are a tiny group of entrepreneurs who exploited the disintegration of the Soviet system to loot the treasures of the state and to amass plunder amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars. In order to safeguard the perpetuation of their business, they took control of the state. SIX OUT OF THE SEVEN ARE JEWS...
In the first years of post-Soviet Russian capitalism they were the bold and nimble ones who knew how to exploit the economic anarchy in order to acquire enormous possessions for a hundredth or a thousandth of their value: oil, natural gas, nickel and other minerals. They used every possible trick, including cheating, bribery and murder. Every one of them had a small private army...

At the time, President Boris Yeltsin was in a steep decline. On the eve of the new elections for the presidency, his rating in public opinion polls stood at 4 per cent. He was an alcoholic with a severe heart disease, working about two hours a day...

The oligarchs decided to take power through him. They had almost unlimited funds, control of all TV channels and most of the other media. They put all these at the disposal of Yeltsin's re-election campaign, denying his opponents even one minute of TV time and pouring huge sums of money into the effort...

They secretly brought over the most outstanding American election experts and copywriters, who applied methods previously unknown in Russia. The campaign bore fruit: Yeltsin was indeed re-elected. On the very same day he had another heart attack and spent the rest of his term in hospital.

In practice, the oligarchs ruled Russia. One of them, Boris Berezovsky, appointed himself Prime Minister. There was a minor scandal when it became known that he (like most of the oligarchs) had acquired Israeli citizenship."
'The oligarchs decided to take power... They had almost unlimited funds, control of all TV channels and most of the other media.' Sound familiar? Congress and the Senate are bought-and-paid-for. 80 percent of Tory MPs are 'Friends of Israel,' as are more than 50 percent of the rest. This despite Israel's routinely unpleasant treatment of the Palestinians.

Do we have any billionaires demanding laws that suit and favour us in the parliaments of America and Europe? Do we 'control' any 'TV channels' or any 'other media' that can enhance our image and status and tell very few truths other than those that show us in a good light?

I think you'll find that most of those who dare to put their own folk first in the land that they made have comparatively little money and even less 'control.' We must make our case in cyberspace.

Trust me, ladies and gentlemen, through the various pro-Semitic laws that Lauder, Kantor and their bought politicians are determined to impose, they are seeking to 'defeat' the ever-increasing internet presence and effect of the truth-telling patriot every bit as much as they want 'flame of radical Islamic terror' extinguished.

If any of you think that resistance is futile, that the billionaires and those whom their billions command in Washington and Westminster are too powerful to oppose, you should take note of the forces that we have at our disposal. For example, in the Winter 2012 edition of the American Council for Judaism Issues, its editor, Allan C. Brownfeld, says this:

“Attacks on Jewish critics of Zionism and Israeli policies are growing increasingly strident in an effort to silence and isolate the increasing number of men and women who are speaking out…
The effort to intimidate Jewish critics of Zionism and of Israeli policies. a group whose numbers are growing dramatically, is becoming increasingly strident. The use of the term ‘self-hating Jew’ is often applied to such critics. One place to find this label flung at Jewish critics has been the website Masada 2000, whose ‘S.H.I.T. List’ contained almost 8,000 names…

The Jewish tradition of wrestling with, among other things, the truth, is now under attack by THOSE WHO WOULD SILENCE OPEN DISCUSSION. This is leading to the alienation of many, in particular young people.”
Oh yes, there are lots of alienated Jews out there who could make any politician seeking to change our law at the behest of a few mega-rich foreigners look very silly indeed.

Is the politician who would criminalise us at the behest of a mega-rich foreigner a traitor?

Yes
No
Not sure
You are the traitor!
Poll Maker

THE ANTI-SEMITISM SCAM (Part 1)

Friday, 20 March 2015

Rabbis are leaders of social change

Rabbi Denise Eger, the first known lesbian to serve as President of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, said this in a 17 March 2005 interview with The Daily Beast:
"Rabbis are leaders of social change... leaders in social justice issues dealing with... civil rights, LGBT rights, immigration reform and immigrant rights, reproductive justice and so much more.”
The Beast added, 'her work is about reaching 'across race and class lines to work together to change the direction of this country.'

Oh yes, changing the Gentile world to one that suits them, one where they control the 'direction' of the 'country' has, forever, been the goal of the Jew.

It's nature to want to be with your own

On 17 October 1971, in conversation with Michael Parkinson, Muhammad Ali said this:
"I'm sure no intelligent white person watching this show, or any intelligent white man in his or her right mind, want black boys and black girls marrying their sons and daughters and, in return, introducing their grandchildren as half brown kinky haired black people... I want my child to look like me. Every intelligent person wants his child to look like him...

I'm sad because I want to blot out my race and lose my beautiful identity? Who wants to... kill your race? You are a hater of your people if you don't want to stay who you are. You shame what God made you... It's nature to want to be with your own."

Those who want us gone have been at it for a long time now, ladies and gents.

Those of you who thought political correctness began some time during the Blair years, here it is up and running in Parky's achingly on-message, 'we're all the same' response to Ali's straight talking common-sense.

If you ever get to wondering who's really responsible for the proliferation of mosques, the mass rape of our children, hate preachers, ISIS and home-grown terrorism, look no further than the 'we're all the same crowd.'

Interesting that the politicians who argued similarly (and still do so) should treat the British patriot so very differently, don't you think? You know, seeing as 'we're all the same?' A whole new raft of punitive legislation (the race laws) was created to keep those who didn't want their 'beautiful identity' blotted out quiet as their world was changed forever.

You and the malign social engineers who effected that change are 'haters of your people,' Parky.

We will not forget it.

Sunday, 8 March 2015

200 Years Together

We all respect Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, don't we?

Nobel Prize-winning Russian novelist and historian, Soviet officer during WWII, survivor of the Gulags after it, Solzhenitsyn (1918 - 2008) would seem to be the epitome of sternly incorruptible sagacity.

However, in an age where Jews as a group must never be criticised, if you dare to do just that, even the most incorruptible can have their observations deleted from the memory bank. Such has been the case with Solzhenitsyn's last great work, 200 Years Together.'

In chapter 16 he dares to point out the following:
"Long after the Revolution, conservatives throughout Europe and the United States believed that Jews were responsible for Communism and for the Bolshevik Revolution. The Jewish role in leftist political movements was a common source of anti-Jewish attitudes among a great many intellectuals and political figures.

In Germany, the identification of Jews and Bolshevism was widespread in the middle classes and was a critical part of the National Socialist view of the world. As historian Ernst Nolte has noted, for middle-class Germans, ‘the experience of the Bolshevik revolution in Germany was so immediate, so close to home, and so disquieting, and statistics seemed to prove the overwhelming participation of Jewish ringleaders so irrefutably, that even many liberals believed in Jewish responsibility’…

Jewish involvement in the horrors of Communism was also an important sentiment in Hitler’s desire to destroy the USSR and in the anti-Jewish actions of the German National Socialist government. Jews and Jewish organizations were also important forces in inducing the Western democracies to side with Stalin rather than Hitler in World War II.

The victory over National Socialism set the stage for the tremendous increase in Jewish power in the post-World War II Western world… As Slezkine shows, the children of Jewish immigrants assumed an elite position in the United States, just as they had in the Soviet Union and throughout Eastern Europe and Germany prior to World War II.

This new-found power facilitated the establishment of Israel, the transformation of the United States and other Western nations in the direction of multiracial, multicultural societies via large-scale non-white immigration, and the consequent decline in European demographic and cultural pre-eminence.

The critical Jewish role in Communism has been sanitized, while Jewish victimization by the Nazis has achieved the status of a moral touchstone and is a prime weapon in the push for massive non-European immigration, multiculturalism, and advancing other Jewish causes.” 
Political correctness would have us believe that Germanic hatred of the Jew arose out of nowhere, that the age-old evil of 'anti-Semitism' provided the Nazis with the excuse they needed to behave as they did.

Well, if what Solzhenitsyn tells us here is close to the mark all of humanity had every reason to fear the Soviet Communism of the pre-WWII era. Not only that, we must conclude that the 'horrors... Jews were responsible for' led inexorably to that war. It was NOT, as popular mythology would have us believe, caused by latent Teutonic malevolence cynically galvanised into a mass ideology.

As it happens, Solzhenitsyn treats us to a feast of irrefutable, easily-proven fact in '200 Years Together.' For more of it, untainted by PC censorship, check out The Barnes Review's take on his epic history.

Saturday, 7 March 2015

Philip Hammond wants us to believe ISIS and Assad are on the same side!

At around 9 a.m. on Saturday the 7th of March 2015, Philip Hammond, the United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary, tweeted this:
Hammond is actually asking us to believe that Syria's leadership is in cahoots with those who have been destroying their country and slaughtering its inhabitants for the last four years!

The Western elite is drunk with power. Drunk to the point of insanity. They are the enemies of all of us, not just those they murder by the hundreds of thousand in the Middle East. Oh yes, we should ALL be keeping a VERY close eye on these.

A little while back, Hammond and co. made out that they were intervening in Syria in order to rid the world of ISIS. If that had been true, America's fire power is such that ISIS would have been removed in very short order. However, ISIS is still here and doing what they do best, which should surprise no one seeing as the USA and Saudi Arabia created it in the first place.

In order to get rid of Assad.

Hammond's tweet suggests to me that the animals at the top of the tree are readying themselves for the next big thing. TOTAL control is what the bad guys are after and they'll stop at nothing to get it.

You should hate them, ladies and gentlemen. You should hate their bought-and-paid-for warmongers. You should want Philip Hammond tried for treason, found guilty and punished to the max. You should want those who own him buried deep.

The fact that you don't allows him to tell the lies he tells and them to murder worlds.

P.S. Here's something those of you who still give a damn should find instructive. From Philip Hammond's 5 March 2015 Twitter diary:
So Philip Hammond (looks happy, doesn't he?) discusses stuff with the President, Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister (also Speaker and Chairman of the Supreme Council) of Ukraine. What, you may ask, is 'instructive' about that?

All three are Jewish.

Still no big deal? How about the fact that only 1-in-500 Ukrainians is Jewish? Does that also mean nothing to you?

Three Jews occupying the three top positions in Ukrainian politics is a 125-million-to-one chance. You get this? The USA sponsors a coup in Ukraine ($5 billion invested beforehand, God knows how much since) just to see their favoured 125-million-to-one shot win the prize!

Anyone out there find all of this just a little bit remarkable? Especially in a country that lost around seven million of its inhabitants to the depredations of Kaganovich, Yagoda (both Jewish) and co. in the 1930s?

Never mind. I can assure you that neither Hammond nor his parliamentary counterparts in Russia's next door neighbour would find any of it the least bit remarkable either.

Speak Out!



Here's why YouTube removed the above video:


'Shocking and disgusting content?' Or a patriot trying to warn the British people of the reality?

The video was introduced to YouTube in 2009. Long before the Rochdale, Rotherham and Oxford paedophile scandals hit the headlines.

Friday, 27 February 2015

You are not intended to exercise free speech regardless

On 10 February 2015, in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo and kosher grocery killings, a certain gentleman said this at the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies:
“By now it must surely be appreciated that depicting the prophet in a derogatory way will cause grave offence among many Muslims and can lead to an explosive reaction with dreadful consequences.

Despite the importance of the right to free speech, you are not intended to exercise it regardless of the rights of others. If you know as you should do Islam is very sensitive to depictions in the media of the prophet you should take care not to depict the prophet in a grotesque way…

The right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion and to manifest such beliefs was part of the Human Rights Act 1998 but such rights must be exercised in a way which respects the sensitivities and needs of other individuals, groups or society as a whole. In other words, they should be exercised reasonably and in a manner that does not impinge disproportionately on the rights of others.”
In other words that part of the ‘Human Rights Act 1998’ which supposedly safeguards ‘the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion and to manifest such beliefs’ is b***ocks, as respect for the ‘sensitivities and needs of other individuals, groups’ overrides this fundamentally British principle.

What is said here, to my mind, verges on the traitorous. The speaker would put the sensitivities of an aggressive immigrant minority most of us never wanted here before our ability to criticise them. Such politically correct treachery produced Rotherham. It bred up all the other Rotherhams, 7/7/2005 and massive white flight throughout the UK (and Europe).

Lord Woolf said this. Harry Woolf was our Lord Chief Justice during Tony Blair’s time as leader of our country and the first Lord Chief Justice to be President of the Courts of England and Wales.

He is Jewish.

Check out Douglas Murray’s excellent rebuttal to Woolf’s Islam-partial thesis in The Spectator.