Saturday, 2 April 2016

Anti-Semitism and Islamopobia - The EU verdict

On 1 October 2015, the Vice-President of the European Commission, Frans Timmermans, said this at the First Annual Colloquium on Fundamental Rights Brussels:
"I think it is hugely symbolic that we have decided to devote this first Colloquium to anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim hatred. I feel very strongly about both issues..

Hundreds of thousands in need of refuge are arriving on our shores and the capacity of our society for tolerance and inclusion is put to the test like never before... Europe is going through a period of crisis and turmoil, which is challenging the very values on which it was built. It is challenging the very fabric of European society and therefore the very fabric of European cooperation. The rise of anti-Semitism, the rise of Islamophobia, each in their own way are symptoms...

Anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim hatred are emblematic of other forms of hatred. At the bottom of all forms of hatred, is the fact that you are targeted purely for who you are. No matter what you do, or what you say, you are targeted for who you are, something you can do nothing about...

About a year ago I started losing sleep over the headlines about Aliya: Europeans leaving Europe, today's Europe, because they no longer see, as Jews, a future for themselves here. Without our Jewish community, Europe would cease to exist. Europe would simply cease to exist.

When you know about European history, you know that the darker, uglier forces in our societies always turn first against minorities. Always turn first against Jews. And when you know anything about European history, you know that anti-Semitism is a triple red line, never, ever to be crossed, for our collective sanity.

Anti-Semitism is not just terrible for the Jewish community, it is like a fever in an infected body; it points at a much wider problem. Anti-Semitism left unchallenged will create a much, much bigger problem in any society, that is what European history teaches us. So tackling anti-Semitism is an essential operation to save what we cherish in our society.

The fact that today, in Europe, anti-Semitism is still a reality, and that it is in fact on the rise – old anti-Semitism that we have known for centuries, and new anti-Semitism, that sometimes tries to hide itself behind anti-Zionism – is something we need to confront. I don't want European children to grow up with police at their school gates; it is a dark, dark stain on our collective conscience... 
In the past weeks, we have seen tremendous solidarity in some of our Member States. But we have also seen the dark side of society... We have heard political leaders declare that their countries would not accept refugees if they were Muslim.

Anti-Muslims incidents are multiplying across Europe. We're seeing a huge spike of attacks. Verbal insinuations, closed-mindedness, prejudice, discrimination. The rise of Islamophobia is the one of the biggest challenges in Europe. It is a challenge to our vital values, to the core of who we are. Never has our societies' capacity for openness, for tolerance, for inclusion been more tested than it is today.

Diversity is now in some parts of Europe seen as a threat. Diversity comes with challenges. But diversity is humanity's destiny. There is not going to be, even in the remotest places of this planet, a nation that will not see diversity in its future. That’s where humanity is heading. And those politicians trying to sell to their electorates a society that is exclusively composed of people from one culture, are trying to portray a future based on a past that never existed, therefore that future will never be.

EUROPE WILL BE DIVERSE! Like all other parts of the world will be diverse... If we don’t get this right, I truly believe Europe will not remain the Europe we built. Europe will not remain a place of peace and freedom for very long.

Ladies and gentlemen... I want to encourage you to share your... ideas on very concrete ways in which we can fight back against hatred and intolerance in Europe. Think about the things we could do in education... Look how we can tackle hate speech on the Internet and in other places. Together, we will take stock of the main challenges faced by the Jewish and Muslim Communities in Europe today. And together, we will explore solutions, from the fight against hate crime and hate speech to the role of civil society, education and local authorities to policies promoting non-discrimination and inclusion...

The importance we attach to fighting anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim hatred also means that we do not just want to listen to you and your concerns today... Commissioner Jourova and I have decided that we will designate, within the Commission, two coordinators with specific responsibility for following issues relating to one, anti-Semitism and the other, Islamophobia. So one coordinator responsible to be your contact point on issues relating to anti-Semitism, another coordinator responsible as your point of contact for issues related to Islamophobia. And these two persons within our services will have direct access to me. So whatever you say to them lands on my desk immediately.

I want to be in direct control of this. I will be your envoy if you want to call it that. I will have two people in my services whose task it will be one, to make sure that the issue of anti-Semitism is her or his main activity, and the other, Islamophobia, and that they report to me directly."

Likes the term 'anti-Semitism,' doesn't he?

Timmermans used it fifteen times all told. He also complained of anti-Zionism.

Islamophobia isn't quite such a big thing down Timmerman Way but it's big enough. He used that term five times.

And who's responsible for all this anti-Jew and Muslim hatred? Why we horrible Europeans, of course. The people whom Timmermans is Vice-President of. Those whom it appears he's going to sort out on behalf of the Jewish and Muslim minorities if we don't start being nicer to them!

Hey, Frans! If relatives of those who died in the Brussels, Tunisia and Paris attacks don't show Muslims a little more affection and respect, will you be on their case? Will you accuse them of Islamophobia? What about the young women of Cologne and the little girls of Rotherham, Rochdale, Keighley, Oxford, Newcastle et al? Will you insist they be more tolerant of their abusers' sexual abuse? You know, for diversity's sake?

'No matter what you do, or what you say, you are targeted for who you are, something you can do nothing about.'

But what if the things Muslims say and do are out of order, Frans? What if they preach hatred of us? What if they, as described in the penultimate paragraph, kill us en masse and rape our little girls? Are we not allowed to dislike them then? And why no mention of this very real hatred? The savage criminality Europeans (and their own people in the Middle East and Africa) have suffered at their hands surely warrants a mention. Doesn't this deserve some minor acknowledgement in your finger-wagging speech?

Why is the horror that indigenous Europe must inevitably suffer as part and parcel of the mass movement into their world of peoples who are very different to them of no account? Why do our feelings and wishes not matter? You will be just as aware as I am that the diversity you and yours are so fond of brings untold joy to very few outside the immigrant, elite and PC loop.

Why are you so intolerant of our wish to retain our identity and maintain our culture as it is, and yet so tolerant of the damage the unwanted incomer has done to us in the past and is liable to do to us in the future?

Why do you care so much more for the immigrant than the indigenous?

Are you a traitor, Frans? Do you wish to see the white world browned? Do you wish to see us enter the genocidal melting pot, never to emerge, as the EU icon, Count Coudenhove-Kalergi did?

Or do you just wish we white folks replaced in our ancient homelands?

As for anti-Semitism, tell me something, in your world, are Jews sacrosanct? Must they never be criticised, no matter what they do?
"At the bottom of all forms of hatred, is the fact that you are targeted purely for who you are. No matter what you do, or what you say..."
So if I condemn the following for what they say, I'm not criticising bad attitudes and warning the world of a nasty mindset, I'm targeting Jews. That is what you're saying, isn't it?

Of course, you may accuse me of anti-Semitism anyway, despite the pretty obvious need for we non-Jews to know that there are people out there who are thinking such thoughts. However, if you dared to accuse these of anything you could run the risk of being accused of anti-Semitism yourself, as all are, themselves, Jewish:

Jews telling tales on their own?

How do you handle that one, Frans? How do you prevent the reality of elite Jewish antipathy towards the rest of us emerging when Jews are, themselves, blowing the whistle?

And, Frans, why would you want to keep such things hidden? Why would you not want the world to know that Neoconservative Jews were deeply involved in the push for a second war against Iraq, for example? I mean, that war and what has followed has led directly to refugee exodus that we, in Europe, are now having to cope with. Why would you not wish us to know who was responsible?

It's a rhetorical question, Frans, I do know the answer. The accusation levelled at the destructive Jew can also be levelled at the establishment Gentile who enables his destructive behaviour. 

Point the finger at George Soros or the Holocaust industry and you must also point it at Frans Timmermans.

You're in the notebook, Frans, no matter what you threaten, no matter what you do, we're here to stay and we're keeping count.

Oh, yes. No matter how you huff and puff, as long as people like you hold the reins of power we'll keep telling the majority what you are doing with that power.
"Dictators ride to and fro on tigers from which they dare not dismount. And the tigers are getting hungry." (Winston Churchill: 'While England Slept' - 1938)
Ring any bells, Frans?

"Without our Jewish community, Europe would cease to exist."
F*** off, Frans. You're nothing but a bought-and-paid-for, over-promoted groupie.

P.P.S. I'm not sure what's happening with the blurred graphics, folks. My computer is screwing up at the moment. Time to invest in another perhaps.

Monday, 28 March 2016

Tweets: March 2016


CIA secret weapon: Heart Attack Gun - declassified report

Oh yes, ladies and gents.

Put nothing past the CIA. If it's nasty, they have it.

And. if they don't, they want it.

Why the Jewish elite hates Donald Trump

David Duke, a former Member of the House of Representatives, explains the panic in the media, financial and political establishment over Donald Trump's progress towards the Republican nomination and Presidency, and the hate campaign he has subsequently been forced to endure.

Irene van Niekerk

Irene van Niekerk is a 15-year-old Afrikaans girl who lives in a squatter camp near Pretoria, South Africa.

Her family has no electricity or running water, they eat when there is food and they bathe when there is water. Irene attends a Special Ed school, due to the trauma she has experienced in her life.

And Irene owns no shoes. Which is a problem. She is a runner, you see. She now goes barefoot because the shoes that were custom-designed for her were stolen by a drug addict. They had to be specially made because she lost most of her toes in an accident as a child.

Despite all these setbacks, Irene's athleticism has won her many medals and prizes.

A story the mainstream media in the West will never tell you.

They will promote Nelson Mandela to political sainthood but they won't tell you how many white South Africans get killed and raped every day by diversity.

If you knew what the results of their genocidal interference in White World actually meant to the lowly majority, you might decide to do something about it.

And that's the last thing THEY want.

Nelson Mandela and the Rainbow Nation
70,000 White people murdered in ‘modern’ South Africa: Obama’s African legacy

Monday, 21 March 2016

Merkel: her cops, her migrants and a German family

One German family's experience with brutish immigrants and Merkel's traitorous police.

She sowed the wind.

Who will reap the whirlwind?

Sunday, 20 March 2016

White privilege!

White privilege?
Are you sure?

Would you say the victims of these were privileged?

Were these privileged?
Or these?
When the non-indigenous are many times more murderous than we are, are we privileged?
Are our little girls privileged?
Maybe it's different in America.

The Beltway Snipers
Coral Eugene Watts
Black Serial Killers

Maybe not.

I wonder where the creature in the video got her warped ideas from?
Do I really wonder where she got her ideas from?

No. I don't. Such ideas are everywhere nowadays.

They're mainstream.

They're establishment.

Sharpen your pitchforks, folks.

Sunday, 13 March 2016

The Weathermen

Wikipedia tells this:
"The Weather Underground Organization, commonly known as the Weather Underground, was an American radical left-wing organization... The group became known colloquially as the Weathermen. 
Weatherman organized in 1969 as a faction of Students for a Democratic Society... Their goal was to create a clandestine revolutionary party for the overthrow of the U.S. government. 
With revolutionary positions characterized by black power and opposition to the Vietnam War, the group conducted a campaign of bombings through the mid-1970s and took part in actions such as the jailbreak of Dr. Timothy Leary. 
The 'Days of Rage,' their first public demonstration on October 8, 1969, was a riot in Chicago timed to coincide with the trial of the Chicago Seven. 
In 1970 the group issued a 'Declaration of a State of War' against the United States government... The bombing campaign mostly targeted government buildings, along with several banks... 
Years after the dissolution of Weatherman, former members Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert joined the Black Liberation Army in robbing a Brink's armored car in 1981, which resulted in the deaths of three people... 
'You Don't Need a Weatherman to Know Which Way the Wind Blows' was the title of a position paper that they distributed at an SDS convention in Chicago on June 18, 1969. This founding document called for a 'white fighting force' to be allied with the 'Black Liberation Movement' and other radical movements to achieve 'the destruction of U.S. imperialism and achieve a classless world: world communism'."
Here's what Doug McAdam, now a distinguished professor, had to say about the Weathermen:

“I remember going to the last... it was the Weathermen or the Weather Underground, it was the last above ground convention. And I remember sitting in a room and the question that was debated was 'was it or was it not the duty of every good revolutionary TO KILL ALL NEWBORN WHITE BABIES?'...

The logic being through no fault of their own these white kids are going to grow up to be part of an oppressive racial establishment internationally and so, really, your duty is to kill newborn white babies.

And I remember one guy tentatively and apologetically suggesting that ‘that seemed contradictory to the larger humanitarian aims of the movement’ and being kind of booed down.”

The Whitelawtowers website tells us this:
"Weatherman, known colloquially as the Weathermen and later the Weather Underground Organization, was a Jewish-led, neo-Marxist domestic terrorist group in the United States... 
Despite the perception of the Weathermen as being an organization of disaffected white youths, five of the seven prominent leaders mentioned by the website Jewish Achievement are, in fact, Jewish. Mark Rudd, Bernardine Dohrn, Naomi Jaffe, David Gilbert, and Laura Whitehorn are specifically mentioned."
A little bit of history most of us know nothing of.

At least, most of us will have known nothing of the Jewish involvement, preferring, in an age of furious PC brainwash, the sanitised feel of 'an organization of disaffected white youths.'
Weather Underground

Saturday, 12 March 2016

Randomly killing white people

On 14 June 14 2014, the Malcolm X Movement held its first public event, 'STRIKE THE EMPIRE BACK,' in Notting Hill, West London.
Aamer Rahman said this at that event:
"I do think about randomly killing white people... when I do think about randomly killing white people... it's like a polite question I ask myself. 'Can we kill white people?... seems like a good time'...

All the people I would potentially murder would be straight, white men. I don't think that's controversial. I think that's a community initiative we can all get involved with on a local level. So organise yourselves into small groups, go house to house, get it done... Revolution's not gonna start itself guys."

And you know what?

This guy gets to say what he says without fear of any repercussion.

This guy isn't a 'racist.' It's only 'straight, white men' who can be 'racist.' This guy isn't preaching hatred. It's only 'white people' (and the odd Muslim hate preacher - all of whom have big, black beards and some of whom inspire 7/7/2005 bombers) who preach hatred.

He may be a revolutionary but, hey, Fidel and Che Guevara were revolutionaries, weren't they? And they, and most of the other anti-White folks in all human history, were super-cool. So that's OK.

QUESTION: If Jeremy Corbyn had been sitting in that audience, and no cameras were recording the event, do you think he'd have laughed along? Do you think he might have clapped Aamer Rahman on the back after the event? Do you think he'd have invited him for a drink and told him to keep up the good work?

Or do you think he'd have brought the meeting to a close and used his mobile phones to inform the police that a Muslim foreigner was inciting racial hatred and fomenting revolution?

Yeah. That's what I think too.

How many of the 650 MPs we elected in May 2015 do you think would have turned a blind eye to the anti-White hatred on show? More than would have made a fuss, that's for sure.

And yet the patriot ends up in jail for 'offending' the tender feelings of the professional offence taker.

Wikipedia tells us this:
"In February 2015, Joshua Bonehill-Paine was arrested by officers investigating allegations of inciting racial hatred relating to 'two visual and written publications on the internet,' and released on bail...

In June 2015, Bonehill announced his intention to join a New Dawn Party demonstration in Golders Green, an area of north London with a large Jewish minority, on Saturday 4 July 2015.  
Bonehill stated his intention to destroy Israeli flags by hand and tread upon them... and said he would be burning copies of the Talmud, a Jewish holy book, in a 'private ceremony.' Posts to Bonehill's website featured Auschwitz-Birkenau imagery and joked that the demonstration would be an 'absolute gas.'  
On 25 June he was arrested by the Metropolitan Police and charged with inciting racial hatred contrary to the Public Order Act 1986. 
Four days later, he was remanded in custody at Westminster Magistrates' Court. He was refused bail at a Southwark Crown Court hearing on 13 July. At the next hearing on 21 September, he pleaded 'absolutely not guilty,' and was again remanded in custody.  
The trial began at Southwark Crown Court on 14 December 2015. Mark Weekes for the prosecution described a poster on Bonehill-Paine's website which... 'trivialises and mocks the death of millions of Jews during the Third Reich,' and said that 'the lightning bolt in the ‘O’ of Golders Green is believed to be a reference to the lightning-flash SS logo. To super-impose that on an area with a large Jewish population is incitement.' 
On 16 December, Bonehill was convicted of inciting racial hatred against Jews. He was sentenced to three years and four months imprisonment."
Now I ask you, does the publication of the graphic below at Joshua Bonehill's website, together with the other, really rather harmless stuff, warrant three years four months in jail, when a foreigner who preaches revolution and the murder of white folks ins't even questioned?

It would appear that the powers-that-be consider some more equal than others.

Do you know who was behind the introduction of the race laws in this country, ladies and gentlemen? Do you know who was responsible for criminalising us and imposing punitive sentences upon us if we dared to 'incite racial hatred' against a 'vulnerable minority?'

Well, the 'vulnerable minority' in this case turns out to be anything but vulnerable. Aggressive, self-serving, ungrateful, malicious - yes, but 'vulnerable? Not hardly.

Check out the Jewish role in the construction of the laws that saw Joshua Bonehill jailed for three years and four months.

Here's another example of what can happen if you offend a professional offence-taker. 

On 20 August 2014, The Guardian reported thus:
"An internet troll accused of sending an anti-Semitic message to Labour MP Luciana Berger has been sentenced to four weeks in prison... Garron Helm, 21... tweeted a picture of the MP with a Holocaust yellow star superimposed on her forehead, with the hashtag 'Hitler was right.' 
The tweet, which referred to Berger as a ‘communist Jewess,' read: 'You can always trust a Jew to show their true colours eventually'... 
Berger, the MP for Liverpool Wavertree, said she hoped the jail term would deter would-be trolls. 'This sentence sends a clear message that hate crime is not tolerated in our country,' she said. 'I hope this case serves as an encouragement to others to report hate crime whenever it rears its ugly head'."
But Luciana, hate crime, REAL HATE CRIME, you know, the type where foreigners preach the 'random killing' of 'white people' IS tolerated. Aamer Rahman said what he said in June 2014 and, as far as I know, he has NEVER been questioned.

And Luciana, do you REALLY think that, if I reported this 'hate crime,' the authorities would do anything about it? I mean nothing has been done in the last 18 months, why would you and yours do anything about it now?

I wonder, will my telling you about this 'encourage' you to report it, Luciana?

Luciana? Luciana! It's all gone quiet over there. In fact, it's been quiet for some time. Luciana blocks my tweets. (You are blocked from following @lucianaberger and viewing @lucianaberger's Tweets)

One ultra-pertinent question too many from yours truly, I'm afraid.

Luciana is one of the many MPs and big shot officials who block me on Twitter. I ought to keep a record of the conversations and what leads up to my being blocked. But I don't. I get into the mickey-taking, info-introducing swing and that's me gone, I'm afraid.

Nevertheless, I have been able to retrieve the following:

Michael Graham ‏@Ironwand 31 Oct 2014:
"@NorthWestFOI @DavidWardMP @lucianaberger 
Jailing lads for 'offensive' tweets encourage more. BTW, Luciana, does Gaza slaughter offend you?" ‏
"@NorthWestFOI @DavidWardMP @lucianaberger  
My replies don't show up in your timeline. Now why should that be?" 
"@paulwaugh @lucianaberger 
Yesterday I asked the ex-Director of Labour Friends of Israel (Luciana) is she was offended by the Gaza Genocide. No reply." 
Elizabeth Day @elizabday 
" This is horrific MT @LabourEoin: Labour MP @LucianaBerger is being targeted with the worst form of Anti-Semitic abuse"
Michael Graham ‏@Ironwand:
"@elizabday @LabourEoin @lucianaberger If a Jewish chap criticises Jewish behaviour, is that anti-Semitic, Liz? e.g. "
No response from Luciana or Liz. But Luciana did, as previously stated, block me.

They don't like it up 'em, you see. The uncomfortable truth, that is.

Politicians kill, ladies and gentlemen. 

In foreign countries, they buy up mercenary criminality, arm it, and set upon legitimate government, after which they drop bombs upon the innocent. In OUR countries, they import those with light years of righteous grievance in tow and, when they preach revolutionary hatred, do nothing to stop it.

And, as they thus preach, they are, of course, inflicting all manner of criminal unpleasantness upon the host population, ethnically cleansing us from our own ancient stamping grounds and, when we complain, claiming 'hurt feelings' and accusing us of 'racism' ad nauseam.

The politicians who invited them in ignore all of this and trumpet the outrageousness of our mostly rather mild responses to a variety of extreme provocation.

For more than sixty years now British politicians have been beyond treacherous. Truly, they are and were the abiding 'enemy within.'

Just in case Luciana, Jeremy, John and co. are looking in, here's a little more 'we're coming to get you' stuff from another recent import:

On 19 February 2016, London-based 'political analyst' and blogger, Sukant Chandan, of Global Civilians for Peace in Libya, said this on RT TV:
"The New migrants... when they come here from Africa and Asia and Latin America... everyone obeys the law, they respect the law, they respect their neighbours but there's a very dangerous, pernicious new Fascism emerging that's essentialising these new migrants and refugees as all rapists, all criminals, all terrorists, it's a nonsense.

I'll tell you one thing: black and Asian people should come here in the hundreds of millions. It’s not right that for 500 years, imperialism has looted our countries of all our wealth, has destroyed our countries. We will come here, we have been coming here, and WE WILL CONTINUE TO COME HERE IN THE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS until, indeed, as Gaddafi said, EUROPE WILL TURN BLACK!"

And again:

Compare and contrast, ladies and gentlemen: Joshua Bonehill and Garron Helm versus Aamer Rahman and Sukant Chandan.

Two of the above draw jail time, two do not. If the offences of Joshua and Garron offend you more than the pronouncements of Rahman and Chandan, I think it's safe to say that you do not wish the British people well.