"A 16-year-old boy was found GUILTY OF MANSLAUGHTER while a 14-year-old boy admitted possession of an offensive weapon.
Jack, 14, died on Sunday, December 2, 2007, two days after HE WAS STABBED IN THE BACK AND HEAD… Mum Mrs Maddison could not hide her disgust at the verdicts. She said: ‘THIS SENDS OUT THE WRONG MESSAGE. THE COURTS ARE NOT TOUGH ENOUGH ON THOSE WHO CARRY KNIVES AND THOSE WHO STAB PEOPLE AND TAKE A LIFE… WHAT IS GOING TO STOP THESE KINDS OF PEOPLE CARRYING KNIVES AND ATTACKING OTHERS? THEY KNOW THEY WILL PRETTY MUCH GET AWAY WITH IT.’
Jack was stabbed by the teenager, who cannot be named for legal reasons, after the pair had squared up. The teenager, WHO IS AFRO-CARIBBEAN, believed he had been called ‘racist names’ by Jack…
Jurors were told Jack was fatally injured when THE BOY PLUNGED THE KNIFE INTO HIS BACK AND THEN HIS SKULL, BEHIND HIS LEFT EAR…
Jack's friends flooded a tribute site set up on social network Facebook… Zoe Brown wrote: 'I cannot believe what happened in court. THIS WORLD IS BECOMING A JOKE'."
Smart girl, that Zoe. Smarter than most of the grown-ups, that's for sure.
Speaking at Chelmsford Crown Court on January 16, the murderer's defence barrister Sallie Ann Bennett-Jenkins QC, told the court that, during her client's incarceration at his secure unit, HE HAD EARNED AN UNBLEMISHED RECORD and added:
"He is a young man of GOOD CHARACTER. He is INTELLIGENT and THOUGHTFUL. He was the very LAST PERSON STAFF AT HIS SCHOOL EXPECTED TO BE INVOLVED WITH THE POLICE in general terms and certainly in a case like this."And what does this tell you, ladies and gentlemen? It tells you that even 'the very last person staff at his school expected to be involved with the police' can, JUST LIKE THAT, turn into someone who can creep up behind a 14-year-old boy, stab him in the back and then plunge his knife, 'all the way up to the hilt,' into the back of his head. If the 'very last person' happens to be black, that is.
Richard Kelly, QC, also spoke up for Jack Large's murderer, saying:
"He has no previous convictions and BENEFITS FROM A LOVING AND SUPPORTIVE FAMILY."
Sentencing him to a punishment that wasn't at all severe, considering the dreadful crime he committed, Sir Michael Astill said this:Isn’t it funny how the wig-wearers don’t seem to realise that the rest of us might be able to spot the difference between 'the use of knives will be met with severe punishment' and the sentence handed down? Judge Astill jailed the person who ended Jack Large's for just five years!
"THE USE OF KNIVES WILL BE MET WITH SEVERE PUNISHMENT… YOU MAY THEREFORE MORE EASILY UNDERSTAND THAT VIOLENCE IS NOT TOLERATED OR CONSIDERED LIGHTLY!"
Rebuking the bad guy’s co-defendant for his 'lack of remorse,' Judge Astill added:
"I’m not satisfied that you are even sorry… You have caused a lot of anguish to his family, just as if you had died there would be anguish in your family. If you’re not sorry for that THERE’S SOMETHING SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH YOU… THIS IS NOT TRIVIAL."After telling the youth who supplied the killer with the murder weapon that murder was not a 'trivial' matter, the same judge handed the unremorseful 14-year-old a super-trivial three-year SUSPENDED sentence.
Just two days before the Chigwell Guardian was telling us that Jack Large’s killer had been jailed for just five years, The Nottingham Evening Post was reporting that Pascal Simpson had drawn the very same sentence.
Simpson was also found guilty of manslaughter, even though he too had stabbed a white man in the back and killed him.
Just before he stuck his knife into Mark Beard’s body four times, Simpson had put his arm around him in a fake gesture of friendship.
Family lived in fear of Bulwell killer
The year before these killing occurred, Habib Khan was sentenced to six years for the 'manslaughter' of Keith Brown.
Khan went into his house to get a carving knife and, when he returned, he stabbed Keith in the back and killed him. Check this out here: Our dead must tell no tales!
Keith, Mark and Jack were not armed. Those who killed them were. That's murder, isn't it? At least it used to be when white folks got hanged for it. But those who killed Keith, Mark and Jack weren't white. They were not native, British citizens and, in this treacherously PC age, that's enough to get you just five or six years in a court full of Brit-bashers at pains to tell the world what a lovely, fluffy foreigner you are underneath. Even when it's patently untrue.
THEY are taking the p*** out of us, folks. THEY have been taking the p*** out of us ever since WWII ended but it's got to the point where THEY are sanctioning genocide now. What kind of a message do you think these manslaughter verdicts send out to all the nasty non-natives out there? FIVE YEARS FOR THE LIFE OF THE ENGLISH! That's the message.
If there is anyone out there who still doesn't know how vast the anti-Brit conspiracy really is, check out the Rogues' Gallery. After you've done checking, ask yourselves this:
"I’ve heard of Stephen Lawrence, how come I’ve never heard of any of these dead, white people? How come THEY never told me who killed them? How come THEY insisted white-on-black crime was the problem when the opposite is far more prevalent?"When you've figured out the answer to that question, that's when you get your country back.
If you wish to gain a little insight into those who have more of a problem with me, for telling tales on the Pascal Simpsons, than they do with the Simpsons, themselves, check out Pascal Simpson and the mad badgers.
And then there was this.
On 13 November 2008, The Express and Star said:
"A MEMORABILIA COLLECTOR has been JAILED FOR FIVE YEARS for possessing a Second World War rifle listed as a prohibited firearm. THE RIFLE WAS NOT IN A CONDITION TO FIRE LIVE AMMUNITION…Judge John Maxwell took no notice of Bailey’s plea for clemency and, citing parliamentary guidance, sentenced Phillip Kent to five years in prison!
Phillip Peter Kent… was arrested in the street by police acting on information... Officers asked what they would find if they searched his home and HE IMMEDIATELY TOLD THEM ABOUT THE LEE-ENFIELD RIFLE.
Mr Stephen Bailey, defending... said Kent, A FORMER MEMBER OF THE TERRITORIAL ARMY, WAS TOLD BY THE SELLER THE WEAPON HAD BEEN DE-COMMISSIONED. Mr Bailey added: 'HE IS A COLLECTOR OF MEMORABILIA. TO HIS KNOWLEDGE THE RIFLE WAS NOT CAPABLE OF FIRING… HE NEVER KNEW ABOUT FIREARMS LEGISLATION…
HE WAS A BONA FIDE, NOT SECRETIVE, COLLECTOR AND WAS IMMEDIATELY AND ABSOLUTELY CO-OPERATIVE… THERE WAS NO AMMUNITION, NO EVIDENCE OF HIS SEEKING ANY OR OF INTENTIONAL OR ACTUAL USE…
CUSTODY WOULD BE DEVASTATING. IT WOULD DEEPLY AFFECT HIS FAMILY AND HE WOULD LOSE HIS ACCOMMODATION."
So, according to the judiciary, a law-abiding, white, ex-Territorial memorabilia collector should get the same sentence as a pair of black back-stabbers who ended the lives of two decent English lads.
Is anyone out there wondering where all the 'great British justice' went? Trust me, folks, when the ruling class declares war upon those they rule, justice is the last thing on their minds.