“THE DELIBERATE POLICY OF MINISTERS FROM LATE 2000 UNTIL AT LEAST FEBRUARY LAST YEAR… WAS TO OPEN UP THE UK TO MASS MIGRATION…You might think, from the astounding revelations cited above that Andrew Neather is a whistleblower. Far from it, as the title of his essay, Don't listen to the whingers, London needs immigrants suggests, he is still four square behind New Labour's imposition of the Multicult upon a bewildered and disenfranchised majority.
The PIU's reports were legendarily tedious within Whitehall BUT THEIR BIG IMMIGRATION REPORT WAS SURROUNDED BY AN UNUSUAL AIR OF BOTH ANTICIPATION AND SECRECY. DRAFTS WERE HANDED OUT IN SUMMER 2000 ONLY WITH EXTREME RELUCTANCE: THERE WAS A PARANOIA ABOUT IT REACHING THE MEDIA.
Eventually published in January 2001, the innocuously labelled ‘RDS Occasional Paper no. 67’, ‘Migration: an economic and social analysis’ focused heavily on the labour market case. But THE EARLIER DRAFTS I SAW ALSO INCLUDED A DRIVING POLITICAL PURPOSE: THAT MASS IMMIGRATION WAS THE WAY THAT THE GOVERNMENT WAS GOING TO MAKE THE UK TRULY MULTICULTURAL.
I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that THE POLICY WAS INTENDED… TO RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY and render their arguments out of date…
THERE WAS A RELUCTANCE... IN GOVERNMENT TO DISCUSS WHAT INCREASED IMMIGRATION WOULD MEAN, ABOVE ALL FOR LABOUR'S CORE WHITE WORKING-CLASS VOTE. This shone through even in the published report: THE ‘SOCIAL OUTCOMES’ IT TALKS ABOUT ARE SOLELY THOSE FOR IMMIGRANTS…
The results were dramatic. In 1995, 55,000 FOREIGNERS WERE GRANTED THE RIGHT TO SETTLE IN THE UK. BY 2005 THAT HAD RISEN TO 179,000... In addition, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF MIGRANTS HAVE COME FROM THE NEW EU MEMBER STATES SINCE 2004, MOST REQUIRING NEITHER VISAS NOR PERMISSION TO WORK OR SETTLE… THE GOVERNMENT HAD CREATED ITS LONGED-FOR IMMIGRATION BOOM”.
"THE GOVERNMENT HAS HELD PUBLIC OPINION IN CONTEMPT FOR YEARS. DESPITE HAVING DISMANTLED BORDER CONTROLS, THEY DELIBERATELY ENCOURAGED IMMIGRATION... THE CONSERVATIVES HANDED OVER BORDER CONTROLS TO THE EU BUT ALL THE OTHER FACTORS ARE DOWN TO NEW LABOUR…The Star added:
The Government seems to make a habit of blaming ‘global forces’ but OUR ANALYSIS SHOWS THIS PROBLEM IS ALMOST ENTIRELY HOME GROWN’… Meanwhile, the London School of Economics calculation for Panorama said around 725,000 illegals are in the UK, but THE FIGURE COULD BE AS HIGH AS 947,000.
Home Office figures in 2001 estimated the number to be between 310,000 and 570,000. IT IS ESTIMATED IT WOULD TAKE 34 YEARS AND £8 BILLION TO REMOVE ALL THOSE WHO ARE CURRENTLY IN THE UK ILLEGALLY."
"BRITAIN’S IMMIGRATION CHAOS IS DOWN TO DISASTROUS LABOUR POLICIES AND NOT GLOBAL POPULATION MOVEMENT. A DAMNING NEW REPORT ACCUSES THE GOVERNMENT OF A ‘SMOKESCREEN’ TO COVER UP ITS OWN FAILURES. LABOUR’S DISMANTLING OF BORDER CONTROLS AND ENCOURAGING FOREIGNERS TO ARRIVE EN MASSE HAS SEEN IMMIGRATION TREBLE...New Labour was doing much more than 'encourage the arrival of economic migrants'.
UP TO 947,000 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS COULD BE IN THE UK – TWO-THIRDS MORE THAN A HOME OFFICE ESTIMATE IN 2001…
EMBARKATION CONTROLS WERE SCRAPPED IN 1998, SO FOREIGNERS ON TIME-LIMITED VISAS REALISED THAT THERE WERE NO CHECKS TO SEE THAT THEY EVER LEFT. IN 1997 THE PRIMARY PURPOSE RULE – WHERE APPLICANTS HAD TO SHOW THEIR MARRIAGE WAS NOT ‘PRIMARILY TO OBTAIN ADMISSION TO THE UK’ – WAS SCRAPPED, LEADING TO A 50% INCREASE IN SPOUSES ARRIVING.
The report says that since about 2000 THE GOVERNMENT HAS SPECIFICALLY ENCOURAGED THE ARRIVAL OF ECONOMIC MIGRANTS. And unlike most EU partners, LABOUR FAILED TO IMPOSE CONTROLS OVER NUMBERS."
Its failure 'to impose a control over numbers' was a DELIBERATE attempt to multiculturalise our world against the wishes of the vast majority of the British people.
Those we vote for are at war with the British people. They have DELIBERATELY destroyed our world. Does anyone who read the articles cited above truly believe that the Labour Party, an organisation created to support and encourage the working man, has put the British worker first in this country over the last twelve years? Don’t you think that New Labour has put the rights and wants of the foreigner a thousand light years in front of ours? Don’t you think that they have spent a lot more time cuddling up to the fattest of the fat cat businessmen and the greediest of the greedy bankers than ever they have to the British people as a whole?
And how about Gulf War II? How has an illegitimate war conceived by American, Israeli and British warmongers benefited us? And the obscenity that is Afghanistan? How was this unwinnable war ever going to make our lives any safer or better?
These wars have ushered hundreds of our finest young men and women into an early grave and severely injured thousands more. They have also caused the Muslim world to hate us and seek to kill us in our turn, as they did successfully on 7/7/2005. They have also cost us all many billions of pounds which, I think you’ll agree, we could all do with right now.
We have been betrayed. Those we elected to serve us have instead served themselves and the dark powers who, behind the scenes, have been pulling their strings and paying their real wages all along.
Tony Blair's favourite New World Order buzz-word when he ruled over us was 'interdependency.' He spent the whole of his time in office making our country as dependent as he could upon others. If you are dependent upon others for food, heat, medicine and medical and technical expertise, you can never rebel. You can never thwart the will of Big Brother. It’s as simple as that.
Remind me again, how much has the great traitor made since he left office?
Consider the following statistics:
In 1995 there were 35,000 dairy farmers in the UK. By 2006, Tony Blair's love of big business had seen this figure drop to 21,000. The supermarkets are forcing three British dairy farmers out of business every day. (New Labour's principal monetary sponsor, Lord Sainsbury, owns the Sainsbury supermarket chain and Margaret Thatcher's Westminster Council pin-up girl, Dame Shirley Porter, owns Tesco)
Between 1997 and 2002, the number of UK farm workers fell by 100,000. Between 1997 and 2002, butchers, bakers, newsagents, fishmongers and the like were closing at the rate of fifty a week in Tony Blair's Cool Brittania.
In 1995, the UK fishing industry comprised 9,750 vessels. In 2005 there were just 6,722 of these left with a good few of these owned and crewed by non-indigenous fishermen.
Here's a little EU insanity:
In 2004, the UK exported 1,500 tonnes of potatoes to Germany and imported 1,500 tonnes from Germany. We also exported 10,200 tonnes of milk and cream to France and imported 9,900 tonnes from that country.
Since Margaret Thatcher came to power in 1979, hundreds of British pits have been closed and there are now just seven left. Of this national disaster, Alan Johnson, the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, (he would later be promoted to Home Secretary) once commented insensitively thus:
"The pace of GLOBALISATION is increasing… Britain is one of the most open, trading nations in the world… we are stronger and richer as a result and have ABSOLUTELY NO INTENTION OF REVERSING THE PROCESS. Whatever the difficulties and challenges of GLOBALISATION the answers will not be found in the stagnant waters of protectionism…In January 2009, the French power company, EDF, bought British Energy, the largest electricity generator and nuclear operator in Britain.
In the UK, we welcome companies who… want to operate in our competitive liberalised market… WE BELIEVE IN GLOBAL CONSUMER CHAMPIONS, NOT NATIONAL CHAMPIONS... Already, BRITAIN IMPORTS 10 MILLION TONNES OF RUSSIAN COAL EVERY YEAR, whilst the EU as a whole imports 40 million tonnes… More than a fifth of Europe’s gas comes from Russia.
SHELL, BP, and smaller companies like Victoria Oil and Gas INVEST OVER $16 BILLION IN THE RUSSIAN OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY BETWEEN THEM. And a Russian company recently announced investment to resurrect the Hatfield colliery here in the UK."
Now you tell me, is there really anyone out there, apart from the Blair/Brown/Cameron/Clegg axis, their Global sponsors and the Westminster wallet-stuffers, who is happy to rely on Russia and France for all their energy needs? Can any of you possibly be comfortable with the fact that we are now so dependent upon those who were our sworn enemies not so long ago?
What do you feel about Chinese businessman, Li Ka-shing, the 'richest' and 'most powerful' Asian in the world, (Wikipedia) owning Felixstowe, the UK's biggest container port, Harwich International and Thamesport? Are you happy that Chairman Mao's heirs now own and run our most vital transport hubs?
If 'interdependency' was Tony B Liar's favourite New World Order buzz-word, Gordon Brown’s was 'globalisation.'
On 26 January 2009, Brown said this to the Foreign Press Association in London:
"We could allow this crisis to start a retreat from globalisation… We could close our markets – for capital, financial services, trade and FOR LABOUR – and therefore REDUCE THE RISKS OF GLOBALISATION… Or we could view the threats and challenges we face today as THE DIFFICULT BIRTH-PANGS OF A NEW GLOBAL ORDER - and our task now as nothing less than making the transition through A NEW INTERNATIONALISM to the benefits of an expanding GLOBAL SOCIETY… SETTING THE NEW RULES FOR THIS NEW GLOBAL ORDER."On 18 April 2008, Brown gave a speech at the John F Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum in Boston, during which he used the word 'global' and its derivatives 79 TIMES!
Brown and those who own him view the world as a global village. They believe that it is their absolute right to rule over this village forever. Iraqs, Afghanistans and world-wide recessions are constructed and foist upon the decent many, in order that the rule of the indecent few be cemented into place. The nation state, the only obstacle in the way of this 'elite' conspiracy, must be rendered obsolete for total control to be realised.
Nationalism is the direct opposite of Globalism. Nationalism, the love of one’s own land, culture and kin by a nation’s people, is the one thing the Blairs, Browns and Big Brothers are afraid of. The Nationalist does not wish to rule the world, he wants only to hold sway in the land that he and his ancestors made.
On 9 March 2009, Lord Peter Mandelson, the architect of New Labour, said this in the House of Commons:
"The nationals coming here from the original eight new accession countries are helping to fill gaps in our labour market our British Nationals are either not available to fill OR ARE UNWILLING TO FILL."And yet, on 10 March 2009, The Daily Express was telling us this:
"Earlier this month, 3,000 job-seekers arrived at a zoo in Warwickshire chasing 150 vacancies for zoo rangers, kitchen staff and cleaners. And 600 people applied for a single post as a £22,762-a-year emergency call operator in the West Midlands...On 9 March 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
At a time of high and rising unemployment, it is incredibly arrogant of Lord Mandelson to assume that British workers are not willing to do these jobs. Most of the unemployed are desperate to get back to work…
The official UK unemployment rate is close to two million and is forecast to exceed three million by next year. Yet figures show 3.8 MILLION PEOPLE BORN OVERSEAS ARE NOW WORKING IN BRITAIN, more than double that of 10 years ago. And a recent study by think-tank Migrationwatch found that 1.08 million out of the 1.34 million new jobs created since 2001 have gone to non-UK citizens."
"Prime Minister Brown always tries to pin all the blame on global problems or sub-prime lending in America. But the fact is that HE IS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CURRENT MESS. IT WAS HE WHO PUSHED FOR THE DISASTROUS SHOTGUN MARRIAGE BETWEEN LLOYDS TSB AND HBOS, PROMISING LLOYDS BOSS SIR VICTOR BLANK THAT HE WOULD WAIVE THE RULES ABOUT COMPETITION TO SMOOTH THE MERGER.In a previous issue of The Express, McKinstry summed it up intelligently when he said:
IT WAS BROWN WHO RUINED THE PUBLIC FINANCES, PUSHED FOR MORE GLOBALISATION, PROMOTED THE CREDIT BUBBLE, WRECKED THE PRIVATE PENSIONS SYSTEM AND SOLD OFF OUR GOLD RESERVES." Check out Someone's Made a Fortune: I Hope They're Held to Account!
"IT IS NOW CLEAR THE ECONOMIC CATASTROPHE HAS BEEN BROUGHT ABOUT BY THE TWIN FORCES OF EXCESSIVE BORROWING AND UNFETTERED GLOBALISATION. THE WILFUL DISREGARD FOR EITHER FINANCIAL RESTRAINT OR THE BRITISH NATIONAL INTEREST HAS BEEN A DISASTER FOR OUR COUNTRY, DESTROYING JOBS AND STORING UP DEBTS THAT WILL BE A BURDEN FOR GENERATIONS.McKinstry was moved to say these things despite the fact that he was once a Labour Councillor and a parliamentary aide to Harriet Harman, the Deputy Leader of the New Labour Party!
So what is the Government’s solution? More borrowing and MORE GLOBALISATION, of course… IN FASHIONABLE POLITICAL CIRCLES IT IS REGARDED AS OUTRAGEOUS TO ADVOCATE THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD PUT THE INTERESTS OF THE BRITISH PUBLIC FIRST by limiting the movement of labour, tightening borders, supporting domestic industries or restricting imports...
THE VERY CONCEPT OF A NATIONAL INTEREST IS TREATED AS BACKWARD. THE NATURAL IMPULSE TO LOOK AFTER ONE’S OWN, WHAT USED TO BE SEEN AS NOBLE PATRIOTISM, IS NOW REGARDED AS DANGEROUSLY REACTIONARY. So we end up with the alternative created by the globalisation freaks where BRITISH WORKERS ARE DENIED THE RIGHT TO APPLY FOR JOBS IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY, where the welfare state pays an Afghan single mother £170,000 a year in housing benefit to live in a large villa in west London, WHERE DOLE QUEUES LENGTHEN WHILE CALL-CENTRES ARE RELOCATED TO INDIA and where desperate migrants flood into the country to be exploited by employers paying £1 an hour…
THE CREED OF GLOBALISATION HAS BROUGHT NOTHING BUT MISERY. IF WE’D HAD A BANKING SYSTEM THAT PUT THE INTERESTS OF OUR COUNTRY FIRST WE WOULD NOT BE IN THE PRESENT CHAOS, SINCE OUR BANKS WOULD NOT HAVE INDULGED IN RECKLESS LENDING TO SUB-PRIME AMERICAN HOMEBUYERS, RUSSIAN OLIGARCHS OR SPANISH PROPERTY INVESTORS...
Without the remorseless pursuit of globalisation, we might still have home-grown car and aircraft industries. Our essential utilities would still be in our hands. Without the open-door immigration policy we would have retained the skills base in engineering and construction that once made our country great. Nor would we have been forced to spend £30 billion a year on public services to immigrants.
A SENSE OF NATIONAL PRIDE, THE INSTINCT THAT LIES BEHIND PROTECTIONISM, WOULD HAVE PREVENTED BRITAIN FROM ENDURING THE LUNACIES OF MULTI-CULTURALISM. WITHOUT GLOBALISATION WE WOULD STILL BE AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY RATHER THAN MERELY A REGION OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE, AN ENTITY FOR WHICH WE NEVER VOTED. WE WOULD NOT HAVE TO HAND OVER £12BILLION A YEAR TO BRUSSELS FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF BEING GOVERNED BY EUROCRATS.
In a protectionist Britain that looked after its own people we would not be squandering £8billion a year on overseas aid, most of it going to Africa where it is used to prop up tyrannical, kleptocratic regimes. It is the height of absurdity that we are forking out £40million a year in subsidies to Mugabe’s Zimbabwe."
In 1998, the Home Secretary, Jack Straw, oversaw the imposition of a new set of Race Laws.
These laws gave the government the power to imprison us for seven long years if we committed the crime of 'incitement to racial hatred.' (A crime that didn't exist prior to 1965)
Such law was not designed to rein in the immigrant, ladies and gentlemen. It was created to shackle us as the globalist went to war with the nation state. Our race laws were constructed to encourage and promote the outsider at the expense of the native Briton. And they have, haven't they?
Have our politicians flooded our country with unwanted foreigners against our will over the last six decades? Have they spent the last 40-odd years giving our council housing stock to the same foreigners? Are they giving our jobs to them as we speak? Are our formerly nationalised industries, which once belonged to all the British people, now owned, not just by foreign countries like France, but by a few mega-rich "new global order" aliens as well?
Are you not aware that our politicians have, wherever they could, covered up non-native criminality and trumpeted the reverse? Did it never occur to you, ladies and gentlemen, that the "New Global Order" would be that much easier to achieve if THEY could convince the most gullible and trusting Britons (the young) to believe that the immigrant hordes were, somehow, better than us?
Ever since the first race law was introduced in 1965 by the Labour Home Secretary of the time, Frank Soskice, (himself a Russian immigrant) our own politicians have put the foreigner first in our country.
The same politicians put the British working-classes, who had worked so hard, sacrificed so much and died the deaths in all their wars, a very long way last. It's not just me who is saying these things, ladies and gentlemen. Check out what Frank Field, an unusually honest former New Labour Welfare Minister said early in 2009:
"His (Gordon Brown's) claim to have provided British jobs for British workers is as hollow as it could be... OF THE THREE MILLION JOBS CREATED IN THE LAST DECADE, NINE OUT OF 10 HAVE GONE TO PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT BRITISH.” (Daily Express - 1 February 2009)How any self-respecting TRUE Labour supporter could have voted for a party that inflicted such a traitorous statistic upon the British people is beyond me.
On 1 October 2009, Field cited this even more chilling figure in The Telegraph:
“In my constituency of Birkenhead, THERE ARE NOW MORE VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON THAN THERE WERE IN THE WHOLE COUNTRY 50 YEARS AGO!”You know, they could put me in jail for seven years for telling some of the unfashionable truths that I tell.
And yet, unlike the politicians who created the Brit-bashing seven-year law, I don’t spin, I don’t lie, I don’t exaggerate and I don’t cover up. I just dare to say the things that the richest and most powerful of the globalist gangsters do not want you to know.
I dared to say some of these things in the 2010 General Election where I stood as an Independent candidiate. I leafleted extensively and was able to put my views pretty candidly in the local newspapers. As a result, a huge number of people were able to access a deal of damning information that they would otherwise not have come across. Nevertheless, their verdict was categoric.
I polled just over 400 votes, 0.8% of the total. Despite the observably terrible behaviours of those who had brought about a state affairs where, in just one British constituency, 'there are now more violent crimes against the person than there wre in the whole country 50 years ago,' the British people were not prepared to contemplate voting those who had created such a dreadful statistic out of office. As the wise man warned:
"If you always do what you always did, you'll always get what you always got".At the 2010 General Election, yet again, the British people chose not to heed that warning.
If you are intested in viewing the information contained in the leaflets I delivered, these may accessed here: