Friday 7 February 2014

Their embrace of open borders

If you don't know by now who is and always was behind the mass migration of alien peoples into western society, what follows should enlighten you considerably.

In the YouTube video featured below the Jewess, Barbara Spectre says this:
"Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural… that transformation which must take place… Jews are going to be at the centre of that…

They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role but without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive."


Strong stuff, Babs. If we don’t allow you to dictate our ‘multicultural future,’ will the concerned Jew see to it that we don’t ‘survive?’ You know, out of spite?

Hey, Babs! Why don't you and all the rest of the Jewish born-to-rule brigade b*gger off back to Birobidjan, the Jewish state that Stalin set up for you in 1928, twenty years before you turfed the Palestinians out of Palestine? And, once there, you touchingly well-intentioned Hebrew folk can patronise each other to your hearts’ content, for-ever-and-ever-Amen. Whilst we leaderless Europeans get on with the business of not surviving without you.

The Jew has been after 'transforming' us dozily unmulticultural Gentiles for a very long time now. In his 1924 book, How Odd of God, Rabbi Lewis Browne put it like this:
"We must redeem the Jews and remake the Gentiles. That is what the Communists are trying to do in Russia and, because of their determination and monstrous energy, they may actually effect it."
When Lenin (grandfather Jewish) died in the same year that How Odd of God was published, of the top five Soviet leaders, if you count Kamenev (father Jewish) as one of the chosen, the Georgian Asiatic, Joseph Stalin, was the only non-Jew.

In The Culture of Critique Prof. Kevin MacDonald quotes this passage from Jewish journalist and author, Charles Silberman:
"American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief… that Jews Are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."
MacDonald also quotes Earl Raab, former President of Brandeis University. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority, he writes:
"We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible. Just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement of European culture also irreversible."
In April 2004, the essay ‘High Noon to Midnight: Why Current Immigration Policy Dooms American Jewry' by Dr. Stephen M. Steinlight, appeared at the web site of the Center for Immigration Studies. In this essay, Steinlight, says:
“Among the articles of faith in the waning culture of secular liberalism that has served as an ersatz religion for many mainstream American Jews, the most vulnerable tenet is belief in ‘generous legal immigration,’ the euphemism for open-borders immigration…

America’s Jews have attained success and acceptance beyond their forebears’ fondest dreams. They’re influential far beyond their miniscule percentage of the population. They wield significant political power and cultural influence. Nearly half the money spent in Democratic Party presidential primaries comes from Jewish contributors.

In recent years, Jewish presence at the highest levels of government has become routine. A majority of Clinton’s cabinet members were Jews. Jewish advisers play key roles in the bush administration’s national security, foreign and military affairs. Had Gore become President, an orthodox Jew would have been a heartbeat away from the nation’s highest office…

Among the best-known indices of its success, 10 percent of the U.S. Senate is Jewish, as is a majority of the presidents at ivy league universities, and faculties and student bodies at elite colleges and universities are typically 30 to 40 percent Jewish. Jews form a high percentage within the learned professions and among writers, nationally syndicated journalists, and publishers of some of the nation’s leading newspapers and periodicals, and as creators and disseminators of high and popular culture. They play the predominant role in Hollywood, and thus shape much of our self-definition as Americans.

Jews also hold key positions within many leading financial institutions, especially within investment banking and the brokerage industry…

Of all the pieces of Americana that American Jews know by heart, among the most-cherished is that verse inscribed on the base of the statue of liberty: 'give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.' written by a Jewish schoolgirl poet inspired by the persecution of Jews in Czarist Russia, for more than a century it’s expressed a highly romanticized image of immigration, one that became iconic and all-encompassing...

For Jews, the immigration debate pits the heart against the head. In their gut, many feel that substantially reducing immigration betrays the legacy of their parents and grandparents. But a growing number believes that maintaining this policy betrays their children and grandchildren. The danger arises because mass immigration means importing mass anti-Semitism.

The upsurge of violent anti-Semitism in western Europe tracks perfectly with mass immigration, especially of Muslims. Mass immigration is also the generator of balkanizing notions of extreme multiculturalism...

Popular perceptions of American immigration are skewed because the story has been largely told by Jews about Jews… the fact is that the celebrated ‘Jewish lobby’ won battle after battle by default. Politicians who supported Israel could count on support from Jewish voters in their home state or district. Even if there were no Jewish voters back home, there would always be Jewish money available to support the campaigns of Israel’s friends in Congress…

The historical record of america’s major Jewish organizations in confronting the rise of Nazism and the Holocaust is cause for shame…

In the summer of 1939, when the ship St. Louis stood offshore with its desperate cargo of German-Jewish refugees, symbolizing for all the world the plight of Jews seeking to escape the devouring maw of Nazism, the American Jewish committee was unable to assemble its executive board to meet because the members could not be troubled to interrupt their summer vacations.”
The subscribers, editorial staff and journalistic contributors of the US-based Front Page Magazine are almost all Jewish.

On 22 June 2004, Lawrence Auster wrote the following critique of Steinlight's essay in the magazine:
“Stephen Steinlight… tells his fellow Jews that… if they turn away from Their extreme immigration liberalism and help move America toward sensible immigration restrictions, the growth of the Moslem community in this country can be slowed substantially and even stopped... But if Jews and others continue in their embrace of open borders, in thirty years time the Jews will find themselves a besieged and powerless minority in an Islamic-dominated, anti-Semitic america….

Despite the dangers Moslem immigration poses to their security and their whole way of life, jews have for the most part maintained their support for open immigration…

Loyalty to their ancestors' immigration ‘legacy’ hardly seems a sufficient explanation for Jews' adherence to a policy that, as Steinlight puts it, spells the ultimate eclipse and ruin of Jewish life in this country, not to mention the ruin of America itself…

Given the wildly overwrought suspicions that some Jews harbor about the American Christian majority who are in fact the Jews' best friends in the world, it is not surprising that these Jews look at mass third-world and Moslem immigration, not as a danger to themselves, but as the ultimate guarantor of their own safety, hoping that in a racially diversified, de-Christianized america, the waning majority culture will lack the power, even if it still has the desire, to persecute Jews.

The self-protective instinct to divide and weaken a potentially oppressive majority population may have served Jews well at certain times and places in the past when they truly were threatened. Under current circumstances, in America, the most philo-Semitic nation in the history of the world, it both morally wrong and suicidal. Not only are the open-borders Jews urging policies harmful to america's majority population, but, by doing so, they are surely triggering previously non-existent anti-Jewish feelings among them…

This element of the Jewish psyche is further illumined by Norman Podhoretz in his memoir, my love affair with america… ‘for years, it's been a running joke among traditionalist conservatives, including those of Jewish background such as myself that ‘any criticism of Jews is equated with Auschwitz’…

What this means is that, in the minds of Jews, any desire on the part of gentiles to maintain an all-gentile country club, or any statement by a Christian, no matter how mild and civilized, that shows any concern about any aspects of the cultural and political influence of secular Jews in American life, is an expression of anti-Jewish bigotry that could easily lead to mass extermination, and therefore it must be ruthlessly suppressed…

We must also note a tendency on the part of more than a few Jews to decry as anti-semitic virtually any rational criticism of Jews, or any normal manifestations of gentile ethnocentrism…

The significance of the Jewish belief in a lurking anti-Semitism among white Christians is made clearer by another passage in my love affair with america: ‘acting on the principle that 'all bigotry is indivisible,' Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish committee and the anti-defamation league, whose purpose was to defend Jews against discrimination and defamation, joined enthusiastically in the civil-rights movement, of which individual Jews were for a long time leaders and funders’…

Many liberal and Neoconservative Jews keep pushing relentlessly for mass immigration, even the mass immigration of their mortal enemies... These Jews believe that if philo-Semitic white gentiles exclude Jew-hating Moslems from America, it would lead those same gentiles to commit another Jewish Holocaust…

Jewish writers and spokesmen have continued to express a deeply suspicious attitude towards white Christian America. In the cover article of the November 1999 issue of commentary, entitled ‘California and the end of white America,’ Ron Unz predicted that if the current non-European immigrants fail to assimilate, the danger will not be an uprising of unassimilated immigrant cultures, but an eruption of white nationalism…

Multiculturalism and minority group-rights movements are tearing apart america's once unitary, individual-rights-based polity, as commentary itself has been lamenting for years, while america's declining white majority has been reacting with what can only be called pusillanimous passivity in the face of this systematic attack on their country.

But now it turns out that what commentary most fears is not the minority group-rights movement, but any possible resistance by white Americans to it, a resistance commentary demonizes as ‘white nationalism.’

In other words, open-borders Jews fear a totally non-existent white defense of america more than they fear the actual realities of mass legal and illegal immigration, multiculturalism, Mexican irredentism, Moslem Jihadism, and all the rest of the forces that are threatening our country.

For anyone who shares this view, it follows that the quicker america's white majority is reduced to a minority by continued mass immigration, and the quicker america's majority culture is pushed aside by immigrant cultures, the better off america will be.

As Paul Johnson writes in his history of the Jews, the Jewish communists of the 19th century saw in Communism the end of national and ethnic identities for all mankind, and thus the end of the Jewish ethnic identity, and thus the liberation of the Jews from the age-old curse of anti-Jewish prejudice...
It reflects, in a uniquely exacerbated and destructive form, Jews' recurrent pattern of forming some global ideology for reasons relating to their particular situation as Jews…

They bitterly resent any criticism of the liberal ideology and voraciously crave attempts to vindicate it, whether by assimilating third-world immigrants, democratizing Moslem countries, or liquidating traditional values founded upon the restraint of individual desire. (consider, for example, the Jewish community's extraordinary degree of support for homosexual marriage, far more extensive than that of any other ethnic or religious group)…

America did not have to be taken to the point of absolute non-discrimination, which required us to open our borders and our culture to unassimilable and hostile aliens, which in turn must result in the disarming and destruction of the society itself...

Having experienced the liberal paradigm of individual rights and non-discrimination as the recipe for their own earthly salvation… Jews have... Carried that ideology to an extreme where it threatens the very country that provided the Jews those protections and benefits in the first place.”
The desire to melting-pot, multiculturalise and mass-migrate whiteness and, in particular, white Christianity out of existence is no recent phenomenon.

Israel Zangwill said this in his 1921 book, The Voice of Jerusalem:
"Men form one universal brotherhood… their individual lives, their nations and races, interbreed and blend and go on to merge again at last in one common human… This new world order would… reduce racial frictions to a minimum by the world-policy of the open door… In particular, boundary questions could be denuded of their significance…

Bolshevism may be good or bad, but the United States of Russia would be in greater congruity with World-Peace than a swarm of conflicting nationalities; and if the Bolshevists can succeed in re-uniting them, they will to that extent be promoting the larger and truer ideal".
In the collected Speeches, articles and letters of Israel Zangwill, (1937) Zangwill tells us that the philosophy of 'interbreed and blend' lined up for the rest of us, would not be not for him or his own tribe.
"I say that without the vision of a League of Nations the whole world will perish… In such a world... would it matter if we Jews did have a single nationality, if within all these leagued nations there was this still finer core of comradeship?"
65 years after Zangwill wrote the above, Havard Professor Noel Ignatiev wrote the following in the September-October 2002, edition of Harvard Magazine.
"The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists."
In order to consolidate the Multicult built up by mass migration, laws were needed to ensure the bewildered majority did not protest too loudly as their world changed around them. In the UK such laws were invariably conjured up at the behest of the Board of Deputies of British Jews.

On 17 December 1998, in a report titled: Response of the Board of Deputies of British Jews to proposals to amend the Race Relations Act, 1976, the Board issued the following triumphal communiqué:
"The Board has been at the forefront of the development of proposals for race relations legislation in the UK… The Defence Policy and Group Relations Division, which monitors the activities of political extremists and racists, has urged successive governments to enact and strengthen race relations legislation… It has also sought allies and made common cause with other religious and minority groups.

The Board played a fundamental part in urging upon government the first Race Relations Act which was based, in part, on reports prepared for the Board by Professor Geoffrey Bindman and Lord Lester of Herne Hill. Subsequently the Board has provided written and oral evidence to enquiries which preceded the passage of the Public Order Act 1986, the Criminal Justice Act 1994 and the Crime and Disorder Act 1998...

There remains some scope for improvement... In particular we draw attention to proposed 1B, which recommends that the Race Relations Act should apply to all aspects of the activities of Government and all Public Bodies. We would support the extension of the RRA to all government and public bodies. These organisations play a leading role in forming public opinion on social issues…

The Board can also see the case for new legislation to combat discrimination and incitement on religious grounds… We are also shortly to respond to the Government’s request that it might consider introducing specific legislation to outlaw Holocaust Denial…

In addition to changes in the main body of national law, changes are needed in the rules and regulations of many institutions and organisations to decrease or remove discrimination on religious grounds."
So there we have it.

He who must never be criticised screwed up the white world. You know, that poor, little cringer who never did anyone any harm? That long-suffering, much wronged and put upon nice guy whom the whole world has hated since time immemorial for no good reason other than that we're all rabid anti-Semites?

Yeah. That Israeli did it, that Kissinger, that $50billion dollar fraudster, that Greenspan, that Lehman brothers boss, that Tesco heiress. That chap who paid off Churchill's debts, that Marx, that Trotsky, those nerdy Milibands, that Eldred Tabachnik.

Eldred who? Tabachnick is a South African immigrant, a lawyer and a close friend of The Dear Former Leader, Tony Blair. He just happens to have been the Chairman of the Jewish Board of British Deputies at time the statement above was published.

The corrupt and venal home-grown Blairs and on-message media darlings did their bit as well, of course, we're well aware of that. And, when the time comes, 'we we're only following orders' won't cut the mustard with the patriot, that's for sure.

Anyway, if anyone out there still cares, there's something else they never taught you in school.

No comments:

Post a Comment