Wednesday 31 July 2013

Cluttered up minds if left uncorrected...

Nathalie Rothschild is the Commissioning Editor of Spiked Magazine.

She is also a regular contributor to The Hindustani Times, the Media Channel and Global Vision in New York and The Jewish Chronicle in Sweden.

On 11 June 2008, she had this to say in Spiked:
"While members of the political and media elite insist that immigration should not be turned into a political football... They are quite happy to use it as a way of hectoring native Britons."
Well said.
"In much of the debate about immigration today, British-born people are seen as the main problem, they are variously empathised with for feeling alienated as a result of increased migration, or chided for not acknowledging the multicultural benefits that immigrants bring to Britain."
Agree with the 'chided' bit, not so sure about the empathy though.
"Immigrants are still regularly scapegoated for social ills, from crime to poor public services."
Oh? You mean the characters in Rogues Gallery don't deserve to be 'chided?' Can't agree with you there Nathalie.
"A new report published by the British think-tank The Work Foundation, expresses... the view that a major obstacle to accepting immigrants into Britain is the British public itself."
Well, yes. We don't any more coming and we wish most of those already here would b*gger off back where they came from and make their own country work instead of screwing up ours. That would, just about cover it.
"Towards a Global Labour Market does make a WELCOME case for accepting more skilled foreign workers into Britain; it says the government should actively encourage them to come here".
Ah, and would the 'welcomers' of The Work Foundation (who composed Towards a Global Labour Market) be yet another bunch of rabid anti-Brits who've never done a proper job in their lives?
"It also criticises the government’s new points-based system... arguing that it will fail to ensure that sufficient numbers of highly skilled workers come to the UK."
Here's a novel idea, Nathalie, why don't we TRAIN UP OUR OWN instead of bringing them in from elsewhere! Not listening, you Work Foundation types? I know, you're in the globalisation business. You want a rootless world where no one belongs but elite and creepy Orwellians like yourselves. That's what you're really after, isn't it?
"The Highly Skilled Migrant Programme, introduced five years ago, was a relatively PROGRESSIVE move... "
Beware the word 'progressive.' It usually means something wicked this way comes for the indigenous majority.
"... offering permanent residence to applicants who have lived and worked in Britain for four or more years".
Told you.
"The report of the Work Foundation acknowledges that entry criteria for highly skilled migrants need to be relaxed."
More and more immigrant footsoldiers required by the New World Order.
"Instead of calling for the PBS and other DRACONIAN immigration controls to be abolished... "
Draconian immigration controls that have seen millions of unwanted immigrants descend upon us in recent times. This has been followed by a consequent emigration of huge numbers of native Britons who just couldn't stand it any more. When I say 'unwanted,' that would be unwanted by all but Nathalie, her media-darling chums, her international financier family, the global elite, the New World Order, the PC Crowd, the bought-and-paid for jobsworths and the immigrants themselves, of course.
"... which would permit migrants real freedom of movement (in our land) the Work Foundation says THE GOVERNMENT MUST TRY TO CHANGE... OTHER PEOPLE'S ATTITUDES!"
There's that Orwellian thing again. The Rothschild types have always been fond of the methodology our George advised us to be wary of.
"Britain, and the European Union more broadly, ‘MUST CHANGE TO A MORE FORWARD ATTITUDE’ and provide ‘THE RIGHT SOCIAL AND CULTURAL INFRASTRUCTURE’."
In other words, more social and cultural engineering of unseemly British 'attitudes' is required! Just one more big bunch of testicle-squeezing race, religious and PC laws should do it. Along with a ratcheting up of 'immigrants are fab - Britons are drab' propaganda throughout the media, of course.
"The report says... governments are a step ahead of the public, who apparently are TOO CLOSED MINDED ABOUT MIGRATION! Ultimately, says the report, public opinion, IF LEFT UNCORRECTED, could prevent the much-needed flow of highly skilled labour into Britain."
'If left uncorrected??' Not so long ago, the Bolshevik who suggested that the Brits in Britain needed their minds fixing might have been strung up. Nowadays, such PC sentiments are the establishment norm.
"Governments must be BRAVER in convincing the public of the benefits of highly skilled migration".
You could always shoot a few dinosaurs, Nathalie! That would be a bold gesture.
"The Work Foundation... argues that the real barrier to free migration is the public’s cluttered-up minds!"
Minds 'cluttered up' with the hope that, one day, folks like yourself will stop taking the p***! Minds cluttered up with a fervent wish to be left alone, to be safe, to not lose one's job to a coolie; to not have some immigrant put to the front of the housing queue; to not have some immigrant who despises them living next door; to not have some immigrant with a set of grievances a light year long playing the paedophile with their little girls.

Yeah. Minds cluttered up with that kind of thing always tended to get in the way of the age-old plan, didn't they Nathalie? And then the Rothschild sprog comes right out and says what the House of Rothschild has been conniving at from French Revolutionary times. 'WE SHOULD BE DISMANTLING IMMIGRATION CONTROLS!' THAT ladies and gentlemen, is how you make war without a shot being fired.

Give everyone else on the planet just as much right to occupy your own native land as you do. That would be the land that your ancestors fought and died for, worked so hard for and sacrificed so much for. That land. Impose 'THE RIGHT SOCIAL AND CULTURAL INFRASTRUCTURE' and punish 'the real barrier to free migration,' the 'CLUTTERED UP MINDS' of the indigenous British people!

Yeah, we know what you mean Nathalie. The 'cluttered up minds... if left uncorrected... could prevent the much-needed flow of' alien destroyers depriving them of everything that once was theirs.

The bad guys are oozing out of the woodwork, folks. By God they are.

At the Spiked web site, this is said:
"Spiked is an independent online phenomenon dedicated to raising the horizons of humanity by waging a culture war of words against misanthropy, priggishness, prejudice, luddism, illiberalism and irrationalism in all their ancient and modern forms."
'Luddism?' That was where the British worker, fearing for his job, smashed up one or two of the hated job-destroying machines, wasn't it?

'Raising the horizons of humanity?' Sounds a bit we-know-what's-best-for-the-cluttered-up-minds-down-on-Animal-Farm to me, Nathalie.

'Prejudice?' 'Illiberalism?' Buzz-words of the ultimate PC calibre, I'd say. Yeah, we get where you're coming from, you spiky types.

'Spiked is endorsed by free-thinkers such as John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx,' says Spiked. Bit of a big, old claim to make that, don't you think? I can't see old J.S. being up for everything that Nathalie stands for somehow. Mind you, her efforts might have been rated a gold star from the chap who set genocidal communism in train, her fellow Hebrew, Karl Marx.

Spiked goes on to say that the magazine's ethos would be 'hated by the narrow-minded such as Torquemada and Stalin.' Well, I don't know about Torquemada but I reckon Stalin would have taken out a subscription. The second-greatest mass murderer in all human history was a dedicated follower of Marxist principles, after all - As was THE greatest, Mao Tse-Tung.

Torquemada, the most fearsome of the Spanish Inquisitors, was, himself, of Jewish extraction.

Beneath Nathalie Rothschild's article, this logo can be seen:






What do you think, ladies and gentlemen, is this massively well-connected woman, most of whose ancestors are buried elsewhere on the planet, on the side of the British people?

For a glimpse into the murky world of Rothschild, type the surname into Google and see what comes up. The essay, Gordon Brown Rails Against Patriotism, might be a good place to start.

No comments:

Post a Comment