Wednesday, 14 June 2006

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

The Jewish Peril, in which The Protocols were first introduced to the masses, was first published extensively by Professor Sergei Alexandrovich Nilus in Russia in 1905.

Excerpts from the book had been seen in Russian newspapers as early as 1903 and Nilus had some of it published as early as in 1901, in a book entitled, The Great Within The Small. In fact, a variety of tracts and essays containing very similar information were discussed widely in the drawings rooms of the Russian upper classes in the early 1890s.

Justine Glinka, the daughter of a Russian general, who was acting at the time as a kind of high class spy in Paris, had acquired the original documents from a Jewish freemason named Joseph Schorst in 1884, paying 2,500 francs for them. Justine forwarded her discovery to her handler, General Orgevskii, in St. Petersburg, who in turn handed it to General Cherevin, for transmission to the Tsar. Cherevin, however, was in hockto certain wealthy Jews and did not hand it over.

After Justine returned to Russia she was banished to her estate in Orel, possibly at Cheverin’s request, where she, nevertheless, passed a copy of The Protocols on to the leading man in her area, Alexis Sukhotin. Sukhotin showed the document to two friends, Philip Stepanov and Sergei Nilus. Stepanov had it printed and circulated privately in 1897. Nilus published it as previously stated and a copy was deposited in the British Museum on 10 August 1906.

In Waters Flowing Eastwards by Leslie Fry (Paquita de Shishmareff) we are told this:

"Through Jewish members of the Russian police, minutes of the proceedings of the Basle congress in 1897 had been obtained and these were found to correspond with the Protocols…

In January 1917, Nilus had prepared a second edition, revised and documented, for publication. But before it could be put on the market, the revolution of March 1917 had taken place, and Kerenskii, who had succeeded to power, ordered the whole edition of Nilus's book to be destroyed.

In 1924, Prof. Nilus was arrested by the Cheka in Kiev, imprisoned, and tortured; he was told by the Jewish president of the court, that this treatment was meted out to him for ‘having done them incalculable harm in publishing the Protocols’. Released for a few months, he was again led before the G. P. U. (Cheka), this time in Moscow and confined. Set at liberty in February 1926, he died in exile in the district of Vladimir on January 13, 1929.

A few copies of Nilus's second edition were saved and sent to other countries".
In 1897, Philip Stepanov was so concerned at being involved in such a dodgy business that he took the precaution of having the following deposition notarised:
"In 1895, my neighbour in the district of Toula, Major Alexis Sukhotin, gave me a manuscript copy of the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion. He told me that a lady of his acquaintance, whose name he did not mention, residing in Paris, had found it at the house of a friend, a Jew. Before leaving Paris, she had secretly translated it and had brought this one copy to Russia and given it to Sukhotin.

At first I mimeographed this translation, but finding it difficult to read, I resolved to have it printed, making no mention of the date, town, or printer's name. In this I was helped by Arcadii Ippolitovich Kelepovskii, who at that time was chief of the household of Grand Duke Sergius."
In 1897 the first Zionist conference was held in Basl, Switzerland. Some have, erroneously, suggested that The Protocols were the minutes taken from a secret meeting of the most important Jews at that conference.

Justine Glinka’s discovery, self evidently, predated this meeting. However, it has been said that Nilus was apprised of what was said at this event and, I suppose it's just possible that he might have adjusted the original copy to take account of this.

To further complicate matters, in 1850, a Jewish gentleman called Jacob Venedey published a book called Machiavelli: Montesquieu and Rousseau. This contains passages that are very similar to some that can be found in The Protocols.

Then, in 1921, The Times suggested that The Protocols had been extensively plagiarised from a book by a French lawyer named Maurice Joly. Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu was published in Brussels in 1864.

A few years later a gentleman by the name of Gougenot de Mousseaux wrote another book saying the world was being taken over by Satan-worshipping Jews and, in 1881, one Abbe Chabauty wrote a voluminous tome that said Satan was using the Jews to prepare the way for the Antichrist.

Another book, published the following year, included several letters supposedly written in 1489 by a Jew who spoke of the chosen tribe rising up to 'dominate the world.'

It can be seen then, that, at the time that the Jew, Joseph Schorst, passed the offending documents to Justine Glinka, a good deal of similar material was already making the rounds of the Parisian bookstores and drawing rooms.

Some historians also suggest that The Protocols were forged by Elie de Cyon (Ilya Tsion), a Russian Jewish journalist living in Paris, as a satire on Sergei Witte, the Russian Minister of Finance.

Cyon and many others detested Witte because he was responsible for the first major industrial push in Russia, doubling steel, iron, and coal production and constructing railroads all over the place. As such he became the enemy of those who had their money tied up in agriculture. He also abandoned the gold standard in 1898.

Anyway, in 1897, Gen. Pyotr Ivanovich Rachkovsky, head of the Russian Secret Police in Paris, on instructions from Witte, broke into Cyon's villa in Switzerland to look for any scurrilous attacks on his boss. Some say that Rachkovsky may have discovered The Protocols at this point. If he did, he had something in his possession which could be used against the Jews and, as it was written by his superior’s bete noire, he could, at the same time, use it to destroy Cyon’s credibility with the Jewish elite and his career as a writer would be over.

Interestingly, the Russian translation of the name Cyon is Zion.

Victor E. Marsden was the first person to translate Nilus’ Protocols into English. Marsden, the Morning Post’s Russia correspondent, was married to a Russian woman and had lived there for many years prior to the Bolshevik takeover of the country. Imprisoned after the revolution, he managed to escape soon afterwards.

What follows was extracted from his translation of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. The word Goy or Goyim is used many times within the text. This is the most common word that Jews use to describe anyone who is not a Jew.

Protocol 1 states in part:
"It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are attained by violence and terrorisation, and not by academic discussions…

Men in masses and the men of the masses, being guided solely by petty passions, paltry beliefs, traditions and sentimental theorems, fall a prey to party dissension…

The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have recourse both to cunning and to make-believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the GOYIM, but we must in no wise be guided by them.

Our right lies in force… Let us… direct our attention not so much to what is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful…

It must be understood that the might of a mob is blind, senseless and unreasoning, ever at the mercy of a suggestion from any side… Members of the mob, upstarts from the people even though they should be as a genius for wisdom, yet having no understanding of the political, cannot come forward as leaders of the mob without bringing the whole nation to ruin.

Only one trained from childhood for independent rule can have understanding of the words that can be made up of the political alphabet…

A satisfactory form of government for any country is one that concentrates in the hands of one responsible person. Without an absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization which is carried on not by the masses but by their guide, whosoever that person may be…

The peoples of the GOYIM are bemused with alcoholic liquors; their youth has grown stupid… from early immorality, into which it has been inducted by our special agents, by tutors… by clerks and others, by our women in the places of dissipation frequented by the Goyim...

Our countersign is - Force and Make-believe. Only force conquers in political affairs…

Violence must be the principle, and cunning and make-believe the rule… This evil is the one and only means to attain the end… Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation...

Merciless severity is the greatest factor of strength in the State… we must keep to the programme of violence and make-believe. … by the doctrine of severity that we shall triumph and bring all governments into subjection to our Super-Government. It is enough for them to know that we are merciless for all disobedience to cease".
Sound familiar? 15 years after Nilus’ Protocols were first seen, Feliks Dzerzhinsky decribed the ruthless organisation he headed in Bolshevik Russia thus:
"The Cheka is not a court. We stand for organized terror, this should be frankly admitted. Terror is an absolute necessity during times of revolution… and of the new order of life."
The first Protocol ends thus:
"Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll-parrots who… carried away the well-being of the world... The would-be wise men of the GOYIM, the intellectuals… did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom: that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities".
Protocol 2 states in part:
"The aristocracy, which enjoyed by law the labor of the workers, was interested in seeing that the workers were well fed, healthy, and strong. We are interested in just the opposite… in diminution, the killing out of the goyim…

The administrators chosen by us from the masses for their servility will not be persons trained for government, and consequently they will easily become pawns in our game, played by our learned and talented counselors, specialists educated from early childhood to administer world affairs".
Sound familiar? A smirking chimpanzee in the White House and the Neoconservatives that ran him come immediately to mind.
"Our international rights will then wipe out national rights".
Sound familiar? League of Nations, United Nations, NATO, Common Market – European Community.

Do you remember the shiny-eyed zealot in Downing Street exulting:
"We are all interdependent now"!
That’s 'inter-dependent,' not independent.

Protocol 2 continues:
"The GOYIM… we need not take any account of them, let them amuse themselves until the hour strikes, or live on hopes of new forms of enterprising pastime, or on the memories of all they have enjoyed…

In the hands of the States of to-day there is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the Press. The part played by the Press is… to express and to create discontent… The Goyim States have not known how to make use of this force; and it has fallen into our hands. Through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade."
Sound familiar? The enormous over-representation of Jews in the media of the Western World, from outright ownership down to agony aunt, has been demonstrated elsewhere in this essay, and I won’t repeat myself here. At the time the Protocols were written the Jews were busy investing in newspers, theatrical outlets etc. but their overwhelming dominance of this sphere of influence had yet to come about. So, regardless of the gains the Jews had already made, seen as a statement of intent what is written immediately above is pretty stunning.

Protocol 3 states in Part:
"Nowadays, with the destruction of the aristocracy, the people have fallen into the grips of merciless money-grinding scoundrels who have laid a pitiless and cruel yoke upon the necks of the workers.

We appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the worker from this oppression when we propose to him to enter the ranks of our fighting forces, Socialists, Anarchists, Communists, to whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule of our SOCIAL MASONRY.

The aristocracy, which enjoyed by law the labor of the workers, was interested in seeing that the workers were well fed, healthy, and strong. We are interested in just the opposite, in the diminution, the KILLING OUT OF THE GOYIM…

It is essential for all to know that owing to difference in the objects of human activity there cannot be any equality…

The true knowledge of the structure of society, into the secrets of which we do not admit the GOYIM, would demonstrate to all men that the positions and work must be kept within a certain circle…

This hatred will be still further magnified by the effects of an economic crisis, which will stop dealing on the exchanges and bring industry to a standstill…

Remember the French Revolution, to which it was we who gave the name of ‘Great’: the secrets of its preparations are well known to us for it was wholly the work of our hands.

Ever since that time we have been leading the peoples from one disenchantment to another, so that in the end they should turn also from us in favor of that king-despot of the blood of Zion, whom we are preparing for the world.

At the present day we are, as an international force, invincible, because if attacked by some we are supported by other States".
Sound familiar? Remember WWII and the 55 million deaths that it cost?

Protocol 4 states in part:
"Who and what is in a position to overthrow an invisible force? And this is precisely what our force is. Gentile Masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.

It is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the mind of the GOYIM the very principle of god-head and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs…

All the nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain and in the race for it will not take note of their common foe. But again, in order that freedom may once for all disintegrate and ruin the communities of the Goyim, we must put industry on a speculative basis: the result of this will be that what is withdrawn from the land by industry will slip through the hands and pass into speculation, that is, to our classes".
Sound familiar? Money, money, money.

Protocol 5 states in part:
"We have set one against another the personal and national reckonings of the GOYIM, religious and race hatreds, which we have fostered into a huge growth in the course of the past twenty centuries."
Sound familiar? What better way could there be of fostering 'religious and race hatreds' within a stable and homogenous society than by the importing of millions who were not of the same race and did not follow the same religion. Which, of course, is not only what has happened here, the whoe process has been officially encouraged and protected.

Who was the Home Secretary when the first race law was introduced? The Russian immigrant, Frank Soskice. His Jewish father was Kerensky's Private Secretary. Kerensky was the Russian leader deposed by the Bolsheviks in 1917.

Protocol 5 continues:
"We are too strong - there is no evading our power. The nations cannot come to even an inconsiderable private agreement without our secretly having a hand in it…

God has endowed us with genius that we may be equal to our task. Were genius in the opposite camp it would still struggle against us… the struggle would be merciless between us, such a fight as the world has never seen. Aye, and the genius on their side would have arrived too late. All the wheels of the machinery of all States go by the force of the engine, which is in our hands…

In all ages the people of the world, equally with individuals, have accepted words for deeds, for they are content with a show and rarely pause to note, in the public arena, whether promises are followed by performance…

In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the GOYIM lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political, which it is not given to the public to understand… This is the first secret."
Sound familiar? Anyone out there ever wonder why the politicians seemed to make so many commonsenseless decisions. Anyone out there ever wonder why the politicians never seemed to want to listen to you because they always knew so much better than you did? Anyone out there ever wonder why the politicians always seem to say one thing and do another? Anyone out there ever wonder why the politicians always seem to get it wrong and yet never take the blame and hardly ever get punished for it?

It’s enough to make us 'lose our heads in the labyrinth.' Wouldn’t you say?

Protocol 5 continues:
"There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative: if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord. We must so direct the education of the Goyim communities that whenever they come upon a matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence…

In place of the rulers of to-day we shall set up a bogey which will be called the Super-Government Administration...Its hands will reach out in all directions like nippers and its organization will be of such colossal dimensions that it cannot fail to subdue all the nations of the world. We will so wear out and exhaust the Gentiles by all this that they will be compelled to offer us an international authority, which by its position will enable us to absorb without disturbance all the governmental forces of the world and thus form a super-government."
Sound familiar? For 'super-government' read: New World Order, World Government, Gobal Village, League of Nations, United Nations, NATO, Common Market – European Community etc. etc. etc.

Protocol 6 states in part:
"In every possible way we must develop the significance of our Super-Government by representing it as the Protector and Benefactor of all those who voluntarily submit to us…

To complete the ruin of the industry of the GOYIM we shall bring to the assistance of speculation the luxury which we have developed among the GOYIM, that greedy demand for luxury which is swallowing up everything…
We shall further undermine… by accustoming the workers to… drunkenness and… taking all measure to extirpate from the face of the earth all the educated forces of the Goyim."
Sound familiar?
"That greedy demand for luxury".
The Me, Me, Me, Want, Want, Want society, encouraged by the 'nippers' of the credit card, buy now pay later banking system. 'Accustoming the workers to… drunkenness.' New licencing laws. 'Taking all measure to extirpate… all the educated forces.' Dumbing down.

Protocol 7 states in part:
"We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war."
Sound familiar? WWI? WWII? Korea, Vietnam, two Gulf Wars, Afghanistan etc. etc.

Protocol 8 states in part:
"We shall surround our government with a whole world of economists. That is the reason why economic sciences form the principal subject of the teaching given to the Jews. Around us again will be a whole constellation of bankers, industrialists, capitalists and, the main thing, millionaires, because in substance everything will be settled by the question of figures".
Now this must surely sound familiar.

Protocol 9 states in part:
"Nowadays, if any States raise a protest against us it is… at our discretion and by our direction, for their anti-semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren…

Our Super-Government subsists in extra-legal conditions which are described in the accepted terminology by the energetic and forcible word, dictatorship…

We, the law-givers, shall execute judgment and sentence, we shall slay and we shall spare… We rule by force of will… the weapons in our hands are limitless ambitions, burning greediness, merciless vengeance, hatreds and malice. It is from us that the all-engulfing terror proceeds. We have in our service persons of all opinions, of all doctrines, restorating monarchists, demagogues, socialists, communists, and utopian dreamers of every kind. We have harnessed them all to the task: each one of them on his own account is boring away at the last remnants of authority, is striving to overthrow all established form of order.

By these acts all states are in torture; they exhort to tranquility, are ready to sacrifice everything for peace: but we will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international super-government."
So now you know.

Protocol 9 continues:
"In order to annihilate the institutions of the GOYIM… we have… taken hold of the ends of the springs which move their mechanism. These springs lay in a strict but just sense of order; we have replaced them by the chaotic license of liberalism. We have got our hands into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the press, into liberty of the person, but principally into education."
Sound familiar?

Protocol 9 continues:
"We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the GOYIM by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false…

You may say that the Goyim will rise upon us, arms in hand, if they guess what is going on before the time comes; but in the West we have against this a maneuver of such appalling terror that the very stoutest hearts quail, the Undergrounds, Metropolitans, those subterranean corridors which, before the time comes, will be driven under all the capitals and from whence those capitals will be blown into the air with all their organizations and archives."
Interesting. Perhaps the lovely fluffy Wilsons, Heaths, Thatchers, Blairs and Camerons have just been b***ering us silly because they didn’t want us to suffer the far greater horror of being 'blown into the air.'

Nah. They b***ered us silly because they could.

Protocol 10 states in part:
"When we have accomplished our coup d’etat we shall say then to the various peoples: ‘everything has gone terribly badly, all have been worn out with suffering. we are destroying the causes of your torment, nationalities, frontiers, differences of coinages…

We shall destroy among the GOYIM the importance of the family and its educational value".
Sound familiar, you mums and dads?
"We shall… remove the possibility of individual minds splitting off, for the mob, handled by us, will not let them come to the front nor even give them a hearing".
The lovely, fluffy Unite Against Fascism folk do this on a regular basis. They and their predecessors in the Anti-Nazi League have been howling down all Nationalist opinion in this country since the mid-seventies.

The ANL was founded by the Socialist Workers’ Party and the Jewish Board of British Deputies. The founder of the SWP was Tony Cliff, alias Ygael Gluckstein.

By now you can probably guess Mr. Gluckstein’s tribal origin.

Protocol 10 continues:
"In the near future we shall establish the responsibility of Presidents…
In order that our scheme may produce this result we shall arrange elections in favor of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain… then they will be trustworthy agents for the accomplishment of our plans out of fear of revelations and from the natural desire of everyone who has attained power, namely, the retention of the privileges, advantages and honor connected with the office of President… this right will be given by us to the responsible President, a puppet in our hands".
Sound familiar? George Bush was a drunk and a regular adulterer before he became President; and, according to Washington insider, Gore Vidal, he is almost totally illiterate. Vidal wasn’t kidding when he said this.

Bill Clinton is a probable thief. Remember Whitewatergate? He is also an adulterer and a drug addict.

Several high ups in New Labour are known to have been snared by Operation Ore, an international operation to apprehend paedophiles. It is suspected that at least four MPs fell foul of this operation. One of the most senior of these was given a massive New World Order promotion almost as soon as his alleged behaviour was uncovered.

The Scotsman newspaper suggested that this same individual was paedophillically linked with the Dunblane murderer, Thomas Hamilton.

Tony Blair has had files from the police investigation of the Dunblane massacre locked away for 100 years. It is rumoured that his daughter, Katherine, has tried to commit suicide on two occasions.

Protocol 10 continues:
"The President will, at our discretion, interpret the sense of such of the existing laws as admit of various interpretation…

By such measure we shall obtain the power of destroying little by little, step by step… to prepare for the transition to an imperceptible abolition of every kind of constitution, and then the time is come to turn every form of government into OUR DESPOTISM.

The recognition of our despot… will come when the peoples, utterly wearied by the irregularities and incompetence of their rulers, will clamor: ‘Away with them and give us one king over all the earth who will unite us and annihilate the causes of disorders, frontiers, nationalities, religions, State debts, who will give us peace and quiet which we cannot find under our rulers and representatives.’

To produce the possibility of the expression of such wishes by all the nations it is indispensable to trouble in all countries the people’s relations with their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases, by want, so that the Goyim see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else."
Before the 1980s, one in 2,500 children in Britain was diagnosed as autistic. The figures suggest that at least one in 250 have the condition now. There were less than 10,000 cases of autism in Britain in the 1950s.

There are now more than half a million.

Tony Blair’s children have not had the MMR jab. In the year it was introduced about 16 children died from measles, mumps or rubella in the UK. This figure was fairly constant throughout the eighties. In the year the MMR vaccine was first given to our children, 33,000 people died of the flu in the UK.

Protocol 11 states in part:
"We shall make Law, Right and Justice… by decrees of the president… and in case a suitable occasion should arise, in the form of a revolution in the State".
Sound familiar?
"What we want is that from the first moment of its promulgation, while the peoples of the world are still stunned by the accomplished fact of the revolution, still in a condition of terror and uncertainty, they should recognize once for all that we are so strong, so inexpugnable, so super-abundantly filled with power, that in no case shall we take any account of them, and so far from paying any attention to their opinions or wishes, we are ready and able to crush with irresistible power all expression or manifestation thereof at every moment and in every place, that we have seized at once everything we wanted and shall in no case divide our power with them...

Then in fear and trembling they will close their eyes to everything, and be content to await what will be the end of it all.

The Goyim are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves… There is another reason also why they will close their eyes: for we shall keep promising them to give back all the liberties we have taken away as soon as we have quelled the enemies of peace and tamed all parties...

It is this which has served as the basis for our organization of secret masonry which is not known to, and aims which are not even so much as suspected by, these GOY cattle, attracted by us into the army of masonic lodges in order to throw dust in the eyes of their fellows."
Protocol 12 states in part:
"We shall deal with the press in the following way: what is the part played by the press to-day? It serves to excite and inflame those passions which are needed for our purpose or else it serves selfish ends of parties. It is often vapid, unjust, mendacious, and the majority of the public have not the slightest idea what ends the press really serves…

The pretext for stopping any publication will be the alleged plea that it is agitating the public mind without occasion or justification…

If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the GOY communities to such an extent the they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of those spectacles we are setting astride their noses; if already now there is not a single State where there exist for us any barriers to admittance into what GOY stupidity calls State secrets: what will our positions be then, when we shall be acknowledged supreme lords of the world in the person of our king of all the world...

And if there should be any found who are desirous of writing against us, they will not find any person eager to print their productions in print the publisher or printer will have to apply to the authorities for permission to do so. Thus we shall know beforehand of all tricks preparing against us…

Literature and journalism are two of the most important educative forces, and therefore our government will become proprietor of the majority of the journals. This will neutralize the injurious influence of the privately-owned press and will put us in possession of a tremendous influence upon the public mind... This, however, must in no wise be suspected by the public…

All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions, aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical, for so long, of course, as the constitution exists… Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us. In the vain belief that they are following the organ of their party they will, in fact, follow the flag which we hang out for them…

Not one journalist will venture to betray this secret, for not one of them is ever admitted to practice literature unless his whole past has some disgraceful sore or other... These sores would be immediately revealed".
Protocol 13 states in part:
"In order that the masses themselves may not guess what they are about we further distract them with amusements, games, pastimes, passions, people’s palaces".
Well yes, this has to sound familiar. Particularly in light of the fact that Tony Blair’s government wanted to introduce a Las Vegas style casino culture throughout Britain. Such 'culture' has, invariably, been dominated by the Jews.

Protocol 13 continues:
"Soon we shall begin through the press to propose competitions in art, in sport in all kinds: these interests will finally distract their minds from questions in which we should find ourselves compelled to oppose them.

Growing more and more disaccustomed to reflect and form any opinions of their own, people will begin to talk in the same tone as we because we alone shall be offering them new directions for thought…

When, we come into our kingdom our orators will expound great problems which have turned humanity upside down in order to bring it at the end under our beneficent rule."
Protocol 14 states in part:
"When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours of the One God with whom our destiny is bound up by our position as the Chosen People… we shall emphasize its mystical right, on which, as we shall say, all its educative power is based...

The errors of the GOYIM governments will be depicted by us in the most vivid hues. We shall implant such an abhorrence of them that the peoples will prefer tranquility in a state of serfdom to those rights of vaunted freedom which have tortured humanity and exhausted the very sources of human existence...

Useless changes of government to which we instigated the Goyim when we were undermining their state structures, will have so wearied the peoples by that time that they will prefer to suffer anything under us rather than run the risk of enduring again all the agitations and miseries they have gone through.

At the same time we shall not omit to emphasize the historical mistakes of the GOY governments which have tormented humanity for so many centuries by their lack of understanding of everything that constitutes the true good of humanity…

Our philosophers will discuss all the shortcomings of the various beliefs of the GOYIM but no one will ever bring under discussion our faith from its true point of view since this will be fully learned by none save ours who will never dare to betray its secrets.

In countries known as progressive and enlightened we have created a senseless, filthy, abominable literature".
Sound familiar? Who gave us Page 3? Rupert Murdoch, closely followed by Robert Maxwell. Who, after he just given Tony B a £100,000 bung, did Our Dear former Leader decide should be the owner of The Express and The Star? Richard Desmond, who just happened to own more than 200 top shelf pornographic magazines at the time.

Who did the Daily Mail describe as 'pornographer-in-chief' when he was the boss of Channel 4? Michael Grade: who went on to become the Chairman of the BBC.

Who gave us regular soft porn on Channel 5 when he became its first Chairman? David Elstein.

What links these gentlemen? All but Murdoch are Jewish and he is the world's leading media Zionist.

This is nothing new by the way, the Jews have always been massively over-represented in the production and dissemination of pornography.

Protocol 15 states in part:
"We shall slay without mercy all who take arms to oppose our coming into our kingdom."
Karl Marx, who was Jewish, published The Communist Manifesto in 1848, which just happens to be the year known to history as 'the year of the revolutions.' Conservative estimates put the number of deaths attributable to Marxist communism in the 20th century at 200 million.

Protocol 15 continues:
"Every kind of new institution of anything like a secret society will also be punished with death; those of them which are now in existence, are known to us, serve us and have served us, we shall disband…. In this way we shall proceed with those GOY masons who know too much…

In the Goy societies, in which we have planted and deeply rooted discord… the only possible way of restoring order is to employ merciless measures that prove the direct force of authority: no regard must be paid to the victims who fall, they suffer for the well-being of the future…

We shall create and multiply free masonic lodges in all the countries of the world… All these lodges we shall bring under one central administration, known to us alone and to all others absolutely unknown, which will be composed of our learned elders. The lodges will have their representatives who will serve to screen the above-mentioned administration of MASONRY and from whom will issue the watchword and program.

In these lodges we shall tie together the knot which binds together all revolutionary and liberal elements. Their composition will be made up of all strata of society. The most secret political plots will be known to us and fall under our guiding hands on the very day of their conception. Among the members of these lodges will be almost all the agents of international and national police…

The class of people who most willingly enter into secret societies are those who live by their wits, careerists, and in general people, mostly light-minded, with whom we shall have no difficulty in dealing and in using to wind up the mechanism of the machine devised by us…

The GOYIM enter the lodges out of curiosity or in the hope by their means to get a nibble at the public pie…You cannot imagine to what extent the wisest of the GOYIM can be brought to a state of unconscious naivete in the presence of this condition of high conceit of themselves… and to reduce them to a slavish submission for the sake of winning a renewal of success…

If we have been able to bring them to such a pitch of stupid blindness is it not a proof, and an amazingly clear proof, of the degree to which the mind of the GOYIM is undeveloped in comparison with our mind? This it is, mainly, which guarantees our success.

And how far-seeing were our learned elders in ancient times when they said that to attain a serious end it behooves not to stop at any means or to count the victims sacrificed for the sake of that end... We have not counted the victims of the seed of the Goy cattle…

We execute masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can ever have a suspicion of it, not even the victims themselves of our death sentence, they all die when required as if from a normal kind of illness… By such methods we have plucked out of the midst of MASONRY the very root of protest against our disposition. While preaching liberalism to the GOY we at the same time keep our own people and our agents in a state of unquestioningly submission…

The prestige of the law has been exploded by the liberal interpretations introduced into this sphere. In the most important and fundamental affairs and questions, Judges decide as we dictate to them… Even Senators and the higher administration accept our counsels. The purely brute mind of the GOYIM is incapable of use for analysis and observation…

In this difference in capacity for thought between the GOYIM and ourselves may be clearly discerned the seal of our position as the Chosen People and of our higher quality of humanness, in contradistinction to the brute mind of the GOYIM…

The aureole of our power demands suitable, that is, cruel, punishments for the slightest infringement…

We are obliged without hesitation to sacrifice individuals, who commit a breach of established order…

When the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head the crown offered him by Europe he will become Patriarch of the world."
Protocol 16 states in part:
"In order to effect the destruction of all collective forces except ours we shall emasculate the first stage of collectivism, the universities, by reeducating them in a new direction. Their officials and professors will be prepared for their business by detailed secret programs of action… They will be appointed with especial precaution…

The ill-guided acquaintance of a large number of persons with questions of polity creates utopian dreamers and bad subjects, as you can see for yourselves from the example of the universal education in this direction of the GOYIM. We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order…

We shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us, and leave only those which depict all the errors of the government of the GOYIM… we shall swallow up and confiscate to our own use the last scintilla of independence of thought".
Sound familiar? Which of you had ever heard of Adam Weishaupt and his role in the creation of the Illuminati before you read this? Which of you knew of the crucial Jewish involvement in the Russian Revolution, one of the most momentous and far-reaching events in all human history, before you read about it here?

Which of you had ever heard of the two Ukranian Holocausts, both far greater than the Jewish version, before you read about them here? Which of you had ever heard of the Jew, Lazar Kaganovich, the man most responsible for the second of these, before you read about him here?

Almost no one.
"We shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us".
Thus spake the sixteenth protocol long, long ago.

Protocol 17 states in part:
"We have long past taken care to discredit the priesthood of the GOYIM and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. Freedom of conscience has been declared everywhere, so that now only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of that Christian religion".
Sound familiar? There cannot be anyone who is not aware that Christianity in this country, particularly the Church of England variety has been on the run for quite some time now.

At a time when the on message priest will not allow our favourite hymns to be played in church for fear of offending the ethnic minorities, it’s not surprising that our state religion is on its way out. The fact that such ethnic minorities would never dream of setting foot in a church in the first place, is conveniently forgotten by the worthy wagtail during the hymn-banning process.

Prince Charles mounted the PC bandwagon many moons ago when he said:
"I don’t want to be the Defender of the Faith, I want to be the Defender of Faiths."
Pretty yuk-making stuff, if you were one of the few who still attended Church of England services, I imagine.

Protocol 17 continues:
"The King of the Jews will be the real Pope of the universe, the Patriarch of the international church…

While we are reeducating youth in new traditional religions and afterwards in ours… we shall fight against them by criticism calculated to produce schism...

Our contemporary press will continue to convict State affairs, religions, incapacities of the GOYIM, always using the most unprincipled expressions in order by every means to lower their prestige in the manner which can only be practiced by the genius of our gifted tribe".
'Unprincipled expressions'?

Hmmm. You mean expressions such as: Racist, bigot, hater, anti-Semite, fascist, Nazi, neo-Nazi, white supremacist, dinosaur, little-Englander, hatemonger, holocaust-denier, extremist etc. etc. etc?

Protocol 17 continues:
"In our programs one-third of our subjects will keep the rest under observation".
Sound familiar? When Eastern Europe came under Communist domination after WWII, this tactic was universally and routinely employed. In the Owellian world of the Chairman Blairs, Big Brother keeps an eye on us using a myriad of computer technologies and hundreds of thousands of civil servants.

And then there is the Community Security Trust, a 2,000-strong bunch of Jewish snoops, to lend an unasked-for hand to Big Bro whenever the snoopers feel the need. You can rest assured that Big Brother will NOT bekeeping an eye upon THEM.

Protocol 19 states in part:
"In order to destroy the prestige of heroism for political crime we shall send it for trial in the category of thieving, murder, and every kind of abominable and filthy crime. Public opinion will then confuse in its conception of this category of crime with the disgrace attaching to every other and will brand it with the same contempt."
So, if I break the law regarding 'incitement to racial hatred' by pointing out some of those truths that the Jews are desperate to keep hidden, I will be called a 'racist,' a 'Fascist' and an anti-Semite for perpetrating this 'political crime.'

For which crime, by the way, I will go to jail for seven years and be regarded by the Big Brother network and the public at large, if BB has been doing his job properly, as just as much of a criminal as those who go 'thieving,' those who 'murder' and those who commit 'every kind of abominable and filthy crime.'

Just for telling the truth. Good, eh?

Protocol 20 states in part:
"Economic crises have been produced by us for the GOYIM… The concentration of industry in the hands of capitalists out of the hands of small masters has drained away all the juices of the peoples and with them also the States...

Loans hang like a sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers, who, instead of taking from their subjects by a temporary tax, come begging with outstretched palm of our bankers. Foreign loans are leeches which there is no possibility of removing from the body of the State until they fall off of themselves or the State flings them off. But the GOY States do not tear them off; they go on in persisting in putting more on to themselves so that they must inevitably perish, drained by voluntary blood-letting…

So long as loans were internal the GOYIM only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich, but when we bought up the necessary person in order to transfer loans into the external sphere, all the wealth of States flowed into our cash- boxes and all the GOYIM began to pay us the tribute of subjects…

How clear is the undeveloped power of thought of the purely brute brains of the GOYIM, as expressed in the fact that they have been borrowing from us with payment of interest without ever thinking that all the same these very moneys plus an addition for payment of interest must be got by them from their own State pockets in order to settle up with us. 
What could have been simpler than to take the money they wanted from their own people? But it is a proof of the genius of our chosen mind that we have contrived to present the matter of loans to them in such a light that they have even seen in them an advantage for themselves…

The Goy rulers … You know to what they have been brought by this carelessness, to what pitch of financial disorder they have arrived, notwithstanding the astonishing industry of their peoples."
Do you remember lend-lease?

We were still paying off the debts accrued during WWII in Tony Blair's time at the top. Do you remember when Harold Wilson went cap in hand to the 'Gnomes of Zurich?' Governments are indebted at all times to international banking institutions. These debts have to be paid off and massive interest is demanded. CUI BONO. Who sit on their fat behinds and watch as all that lovely lolly come rolling in? Take a guess.

The US taxpayer has been many trillions of dollars in debt to the international financiers for a very, very long time now. The US taxpayer has to pay dearly for the servicing of this debt. In one way or another, so do the rest of us.

And then along comes sub-rime, the credit crunch and world-wide recession. A heaven-sent (or artificially manufactured) opportunity to fleece us even more.

Protocol 21 states in part.
"Of foreign loans I shall say nothing more, because they have fed us with national moneys of the GOYIM, but for our State there will be no foreigners, that is, nothing external… We have taken advantage of the venality of administrators and slackness of rulers to get our moneys twice, thrice and more times over, by lending to the GOY governments moneys which were not at all needed by the States…

For the payment of interest it becomes necessary to have recourse to new loans, which do not swallow up but only add to the capital debt. And when this credit is exhausted it becomes necessary by new taxes to cover, not the loan, but only the interest on it. These taxes are a debit employed to cover a debit".
See above.

Protocol 22 states in part:
"The supreme lord who will replace all now existing rulers, dragging in their existence among societies demoralized by us, societies that have denied even the authority of God… he will be obliged to kill off those existing societies…

These forces now triumph in manifestations of robbery and every kind of violence under the mask of principles of freedom and every kind of violence under the mask of principles of freedom and rights."
Sound familiar? Every year crime rises all over the Western World. Every day we hear of some bleeding-heart official making excuses for the criminal and turning a deaf ear to the protests of the victimised. There are something in the region of a hundred organisations devoted to the welfare of the criminal in Britain, there are, at any given time, one, two or three devoted to the welfare of the victim.

It’s nuts. Governtmentally sponsored lunacy. And the bloke who takes this non-law into his own hands? He is ALWAYS punished with more severity than normal. If Big Bro thinks he can get away with it.


Farmer Tony Martin was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder. He killed one of three Gypsy burglars. (His farm had previously been broken into on ten occasions) The blood of the British people began to boil at this injustice.

The sentence was quickly reduced to five years for manslaughter.

Protocol 24 states in part:
"I pass now to the method of confirming the dynastic roots of King David to the last strata of the earth. Certain members of the seed of David will prepare the kings and their heirs, selecting not by right of heritage but by eminent capacities, inducting them into the most secret mysteries of the political, into schemes of government, but providing always that none may come to knowledge of the secrets…

Only the king and the three who stood sponsor for him will know what is coming. In the person of the king who with unbending will is master of himself and of humanity all will discern as it were fate with its mysterious ways…

The King of the Jews must not be at the mercy of his passions, and especially of sensuality: on no side of his character must he give brute instincts power over his mind. Sensuality worse than all else disorganizes the capacities of the mind and clearness of views, distracting the thoughts to the worst and most brutal side of human activity."
The Protocols end with the words:
"Signed by the Representatives of Zion of the 33rd degree."
The highest rank that a Freemason can attain is the 33rd degree.

A report titled: The Power And Aims Of International Jewry, was drawn up by the US War Department in August 1919.

This document remained classified until 1973. Here are some of the things it said:
"We have been informed at second hand that an English translation of the Protocols has been shown to Justice Brandeis and Jacob Schiff each of whom vigorously disclaimed their authenticity, Mr. Schiff asserting that they are a creation of German propagandists. (Brandeis was the first Jewish Judgeappointed to the Supreme Court and Schiff was a mega-rich Jewish businessman who was the principal monetary backer of the Russian revolution)

This explanation seems almost impossible considering the circumstances of the Russian publication, facts which perhaps were not made known to him, at the time he saw the translation, much less probable than the suggestion said to have been made by Justice Brandeis that the Protocols are the creation of a fanatic Russian anti-Semite…

As previously stated, the Protocols are attributed to Herzl himself and one certainly must note the identity of thought found in the Protocols on the one hand and in Herzl’s public writings, and in the writings of other prominent past and contemporary Jewish leaders on the other.

Protocol 1, page 1: ‘According to the law of being might is right.’

Protocol 1, page 3: Our right lies in force.'

Herzl -‘The Jewish State’, page 2: ‘For this, as indeed every point which arises in the commerce of nations, is a question of might. In the world of today and for an indefinite period, it will probably remain so, might precious right.’

A number of similar illustrations such as the quotations relating to the ‘terrible power of the Jewish purse’ are set out in Appendix A.
Some of the important events which have occurred since 1897 have fulfilled in a striking manner the predictions and aims expressed in the Protocols themselves…

The coming of a world war is predicted which the Jews are to secretly promote. The creation of the chaos of Bolshevism is described as to be worked out by Jews all over the world as a step towards Jewish world dominion.

Furthermore, it is impossible to read far in the Protocols and in the public writings of Hess, Herzl and other Jewish Leaders without being impressed with the constant reiteration of certain fundamental principles and ideals. Among the more important of these around which the forces of Jewry are now rallying are the following:

The Jews are a nation held together by their common enemies.

With the Jews Nationality and Religion are inseparable and co-extensive.

All groups of Jews from the extreme radicals to the most conservative, are united in this National Religious Movement.

Once a Jew always a Jew.

The teachings of the Talmud still exercises a profound influence on Jewish life.

Judaism and Socialism are different expressions of the same movement.

The Jews consider themselves the original exponents of internationalism and the League of Nations."
A 1920 review of The Protocols in The Times had this to say:
"What are these 'Protocols?'... Are they a forgery? If so, whence comes the uncanny note of prophecy, prophecy in parts fulfilled, in parts far gone in the way of fulfilment? Have we been struggling these tragic years to blow up and extirpate the secret organisation of German world dominion ony to find beneath it another, more dangerous because more secret? Have we been straining every fibre of our national body, escaped of a 'Pax Germanica' only to fall into a 'Pax Judaica?'

The 'Elders of Zion,' as represented in their 'Protocols' are by no means kinder taskmasters than William II and his henchmen would have been."
In an article titled The Jewish Peril, published on 19 June 1920, The Christian Science Monitor had this to say:
"It is necessary to plunge into the thorny question as to whether the Jewish Peril, of today, is as much a delusion of its prophets as was the Yellow Peril in its day. What is important to dwell upon is the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil...

The human mind jeers at the theory of mental manipulation, yet prominent politicians, philosophers and soldiers are found, at critical moments, giving expression to views of an absolutely non-moral description, which are not in accordance with their behavior in ordinary life...

It is here that the conspiracy of evil against humanity becomes recognizable… It would be a tremendous mistake to conclude that the Jewish peril... does not exist...

That a secret international political organization exists, working unremittingly by means of its Bureau of Psychology, though the world which should be awake to it is entirely asleep to it, is, to the man who can read the signs of the times, a thing unquestionable."
In a 17 February 1921 edition of The New York World, the motor magnate, Henry Ford, put the case for Nilus thus:

"The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now."

The historian, Nesta Webster, in a letter written on 4 May 1934, said:
"Personally, I am more than ever inclined to believe that the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are genuine. Without them I do not see how one could explain things that are happening today. More than ever, I think the Jews are at the bottom of all our troubles."
David Ash, the author of the 1995 work, Beware of God, says this:
"Why was Adolf Hitler given a copy of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion by a Jew called Rosenberg? He decided on a pogrom against the Jews after reading them. Mein Kampf was subsequently published. Why was Adolf Hitler then funded by leading Jewish bankers? This has to be one of the greatest paradoxes in history.

The authors of The Protocols obviously didn't care if millions of their own people died because this furthered their cause of world domination and mass subjugation."
Ash was Jewish.

The Rothschilds thought well enough of Marcus Eli Ravage, a Romanian-born Jewish reporter for The New York Tribune, to allow him to write an official biography of the family.

In his extraordinary tract, A Real Case Against the Jews, which was published in Century Magazine in 1928, he says:
"You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge. What of it?...

You make much noise and fury about undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, schools, your laws and your government, and the very thoughts you think every day?...

The ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion,’ which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. All right... We will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic.

But what is that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?"
The usual suspects might claim Ravage’s words are taken out of context so, if you want to check out the whole of the article, it can be found here: A Real Case Against the Jews

In 1844, Benjamin Disraeli, who was our Prime Minsiter on two seperate occasions, wrote thus, in his novel, Coningsby:
"Yet here is the International Jew, full dress; he is the Protocolist, too, wrapped in mystery, a man whose fingers sweep all the strings of human motive, and who controls the chief of the brutal forces, money."
It is, perhaps, interesting to compare the hostility heaped upon those who would have their fellows peruse the The Protocols with the respect accorded by so many to the 'prophecies' of the Jewish seer, Nostradamus.

Nostradamus’ work, 'Centuries' was a poetically composed stab at what might occur in the future. Now, as with most fortune tellers who predict a great many things, some of his predictions could be said to have come to pass if you are prepared to stretch a point or two.

However, quite a few of these 'predictions' are actually spliced together from different parts of his writings in order to fit the bill of whichever expert or follower is seeking to advance his reputation. Also, ardent adherents of Nostradamus are able to infer a great deal that is not actually written down because his poetic style allows for a deal of interpretative licence.

When Nostradamus’ name is mentioned, whether we have ever bothered to read any of his writings or not, we are instantly involved. We are interested in knowing what he foresaw and what else he managed to foretell.

If you read The Protocols, however, there is no poetry to conjure with and no one has to take a bit from here and a bit from there to make the case. This nineteenth century document just happens to predict much of what was to come in the twentieth century.

Whoever put The Protocols together was one (or more) of the following:

Someone who wished merely to defame the Jews. Someone who wished to deflect attention from some other elite grouping bent on world domination. Someone who, in order to try and alert the non-Jewish world to what they believed were the secret intentions of a powerful body of Jews and their co-conspirators, was prepared to concoct a document predicting their future intentions. A raving loony who, by an extraordinary coincidence, happened to accurately foretell a hell of a lot of stuff that most at that time would not be remotely aware of. Someone who was intimately acquainted with the predatory aspirations and designs of the Jewish elite.

It seems likely that The Protocols were inspired by and constructed from a variety of earlier works and, whoever the author was, he would, probably, have used the previous writings of the likes of Venedey, Joly, de Mousseaux, Chabauty and de Cyon etc. as a blueprint. Whether this was done in order to enlighten us, or as a cynical attempt to make make money from a credulous non-Jewish world, is a matter for debate.

The Jews, themselves, at pains to rubbish The Protocols ever since they were first published, have been at even greater pains to ensure that they are never read by the common man, rubbish or not.

Anyway, there is plenty of historical evidence out there suggesting that there was a deal of Jewish involvement in the creation and exposure of these documents.

For what its worth, I reckon that The Protocols were, probably, concocted by some very well informed person in an attempt to warn the rest of us of what he believed that the elite of world Jewry were up to, hoping, perhaps, to galvanise the non-Jew into taking action against them.

That the author should choose the vehicle that he did for this exposition should not be regarded as proof of any intrinsic deceitfulness. The playwright may write a play in order to throw some light upon a subject close to his heart. A novelist may write a novel to expose a body of information that the establishment would rather be kept secret. A documentary maker may include a dramatised scene in his documentary in order to illuminate a point he is trying to make. And a Stephen Spielberg may make a film like Schindler's List to ram home a message to those who wouldn't otherwise have known what the message was.

If The Protocols were designed to inform an uninformed majority of an historical conspiracy that was intended to do them harm, then Nilus et al did us all a favour. Unfortunately, for many, the favour came too late.

Within 12 years of their publication, a very real conspiracy had overtaken the people of Eastern Europe. The Russian Revolution ushered in a period of genocide and horror that only really ended with Stalin's death in 1953.

Apart from Lenin, who was one quarter Jewish, and Stalin, who was a Georgian Asiatic, Sverdlov, Zinoviev, Trotsky, Kaganovich, Kamenev, Sokolnikov, Yagoda and a sizeable majority of the movers and shakers within the revolutionary hierarchy were Jewish.

Sverdlov countersigned the Tsar's death warrant and the Chairman of the Petrograd Cheka who carried out the executions, Moses Uritsky, was also Jewish. The Cheka, the original incarnation of the NKVD and the KGB, roamed Russia imposing the Bolshevik's will in the early twenties. The organisation was comprised, for the most part, of Jews.

A.B. Khalatov, who was the head of the Ministry that distributed food throughout the empire when the first Ukrainian famine occurred, was also Jewish. Lazar Kaganovich, who was in charge of the operation that saw between seven and ten million Ukrainians perish in the 1930s, was also Jewish.

The fact that so many Jews found themselves at the top of the Bolshevik murder-machine when it seized power in 1917, was not a coincidence. The fact that they behaved with such opportunistic brutality when they were in a position to do so, was not a coincidence either.

The Protocols may be perused in their entirety here.

And, if you wish to check out the hoax/forgery argument, you might wish to visit this website.


The figure of 6,000,000 Jewish dead in WWII has been known to be exaggerated for some time now.

In 1948, the memorial plaque featured here was erected at Auschwitz. The four million figure cited was the basis for the six million Jewish dead that nowadays must not be questioned. Unfortunately for the Holocaust Industry, an enormous amount of revisonist pressure has been put upon them to come clean over the years and, nowadays, the Auschwitz web site says that just 1.1 million died there.

At the same time as the figures at Auschwitz were being revised, the statistics at the other death camps were being overhauled. Dachau, for example, used to have a sign up that said 240,000 Jews died there, gassed in 'ovens' by the Nazis. Nowadays, a new sign states that 19,000 people of all races died there, mainly of typhus and starvation. Nowhere does it say that anyone ever died in an 'oven.'

Have the authorities revised the six million figure downwards since it became known that four million did not perish at Auschwitz? They have not. In fact, throughout Europe, there are people in jail right now for daring to question the pro-Semitic version of history. Indeed, the historian, David Irving, was imprisoned in Austria for falling foul of 'holocaust denier' laws.

Check out The Holocaust for a thorough appraisal of these matters.

The early twentieth century historian, Leslie Fry, tells us that most of the copies of The Protocols known to have existed in Russia in the time of Nicholas II were destroyed during Kerensky’s brief time in office.

Under his Bolshevik successors the usual punishment for possessing a copy was death.

It is, perhaps, instructive to note that Kerensky's Private Secretary, (Jewish) was the father of the man who oversaw the introduction of the very first anti-indigenous race law in our country.

Russian immigrant, Frank Soskice, was Harold Wilson's very first Home Secretary.

No comments:

Post a Comment