“Anti-Semites are fully within their rights. It would be an excellent idea to call in respectable, accredited anti-Semites as liquidators of property… At first they must not be given large fees for this, otherwise we shall spoil our instruments and make them despicable as ‘stooges of the Jews.’He also said this:
Later their fees will increase, and in the end we shall have only Gentile officials in the countries from which we have emigrated. The anti-Semites will become our most dependable friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies.”
"Anti-semitism too probably contains the Divine will to Good, because it forces us to close ranks, unites us through pressure, and through our unity will make us free."On 10 July 1905, Prime Minister Arthur Balfour said this in the House of Commons:
“The undoubted evils that had fallen upon the country from an immigration which was largely Jewish."On page 34 of Zionism in the Age of the Dictators, (1983) Lenni Brenner quotes Chaim Weizmann, the first President of Israel, as having said this in March 1912:
“Each country can absorb only a limited number of Jews, if she doesn’t want disorders in her stomach. Germany already has too many Jews.”On pages 22-23, Brenner quotes Hashomer Hatzair, the magazine of the Zionist youth organization, as having said this in 1917:
“The Jew is a caricature of a normal, natural human being, both physically and spiritually. As an individual in society he revolts and throws off the harness of social obligation, knows no order nor discipline?”The same remark was republished as late as 1936.
In a letter of 26 February 1930, Sigmund Freud wrote the following to Dr. Chaim Koffler:
“I do not think that Palestine could ever become a Jewish state, nor that the Christian and Islamic worlds would ever be prepared to have their holy places under Jewish care. It would have seemed more sensible to me to establish a Jewish homeland on a less historically-burdened land.
But I know that SUCH A RATIONAL VIEWPOINT WOULD NEVER HAVE GAINED THE ENTHUSIASM OF THE MASSES AND THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF THE WEALTHY. I concede with sorrow that THE BASELESS FANATICISM OF OUR PEOPLE IS IN PART TO BE BLAMED FOR THE AWAKENING OF ARAB DISTRUST.”
In his 1987 essay, 'Awake my Glory,' Rabbi Avigdor Miller of Bais Yisroel Torah Center said:"The lilliputian accular leaders and the reform 'rabbis' have blindly led the masses into perilous paths, and it was they that poured oil on the Nazis’ wrath and turned it into a catalysm.On 24 March 1933, the headline in The Daily Express read:
They ridiculed the humble ways of the old generations and they mocked the Torah-way of placating the nations by restraint and quiet diplomacy, and thus the majority of Jewry were misled into the policy of Nationalism and of demanding their rights with vociferousness...
These unthinking men (the Jewish 'leaders') rose up in their places as security in the free lands and they cast ridicule upon Hitler and enraged him by their irresponsible demonstrations and speeches and they kindled his wrath by the reckless boycott. All this was in the year 5693 (1933) when the nations where still at peace with this evil one (Hitler) and there was no way other than humility and negotiation by persuasion. But these self-ordained leader acted according to the opposite of wisdom and the opposite of the oath imposed by G-d (not to arouse the nations by open opposition), and they had a great share in arousing the frenzy of the mad dog to the highest degree."
"Judea Declares War on Germany - Jews of All the World Unite - Boycott of German Goods - Mass Demonstrations."The article beneath the headline said:
"The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare an economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany has revived the old war symbol of Judas to new life. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tight to each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German persecutors of their fellow believers.The Jewish newspaper Natscha Retsch said:
The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order to join the holy war against Hitler's people... (Germany is) now confronted with an international boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry... In London, New York, Paris and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic crusade...
Worldwide preparations are being made to organize protest demonstrations...
The old and reunited nation of Israel gets in formation with new and modern weapons to fight out its age old battle against its persecutors."
"The war against Germany will be waged by all Jewish communities, conferences, congresses... by every individual Jew. Thereby the war against Germany will ideologically enliven and promote our interests, which require that Germany be wholly destroyed.German Foreign Minister Konstantin von Neurath said:
The danger for us Jews lies in the whole German people, in Germany as a whole as well as individually. It must be rendered harmless for all time...
In this war we Jews have to participate, and this with all the strength and might we have at our disposal."
"As concerns Jews, I can only say that their propagandists abroad are rendering their coreligionists in Germany no service by giving the German public, through their distorted and untruthful news about persecution and torture of Jews, the impression that they actually halt at nothing, not even at lies and calumny, to fight the present German government."US Secretary of State, Cordell Hull, sent the following message to Rabbi Stephen Wise urging caution:
"Whereas there was for a short time considerable physical mistreatment of Jews, this phase may be considered virtually terminated... A stabilization appears to have been reached in the field of personal mistreatment... I feel hopeful that the situation which has caused such widespread concern throughout this country will soon revert to normal."On 21 June 1933, the Zionist Federation of Germany sent the following memorandum to the Nazis:
“An answer to the Jewish question truly satisfying to the national state can be brought about only with THE COLLABORATION OF THE JEWISH MOVEMENT that aims at a social, cultural, and moral renewal of Jewry … a rebirth of national life, SUCH AS IS OCCURRING IN GERMAN LIFE THROUGH ADHESION TO CHRISTIAN AND NATIONAL VALUES, MUST ALSO TAKE PLACE IN THE JEWISH NATIONAL GROUP. For the Jew, too, origin, religion, community of fate and group consciousness must be of decisive significance in the shaping of his life …On 17 April 1938, Albert Einstein said this before the National Labor Committee for Palestine:
On the foundation of THE NEW STATE, WHICH HAS ESTABLISHED THE PRINCIPLE OF RACE, we wish so to fit our community… Our acknowledgement of Jewish nationality provides for A CLEAR AND SINCERE RELATIONSHIP TO THE GERMAN PEOPLE AND ITS NATIONAL AND RACIAL REALITIES…
WE TOO, ARE AGAINST MIXED MARRIAGES and are for maintaining the purity of the Jewish group.”
“I should much rather see reasonable agreement with the Arabs on the basis of living together in peace than the creation of a Jewish state… I am afraid of the inner damage Judaism will sustain, especially from the development of a narrow nationalism within our own ranks, against which we have already had to fight without a Jewish state.”On p. 387 of his 1972 biography, 'Beaverbrook,' A.J.P. Taylor tells that, in a December 1938 letter, he said this:
"There are twenty thousand German Jews in England, in the professions, pursuing research, in chemical operations, etcetera. THESE ALL WORK AGAINST SUCH AN ACCOMMODATION…
THE JEWS HAVE GOT A BIG POSITION IN THE PRESS HERE…
I have for years been a prophet of no war... But at last I am shaken. THE JEWS MAY DRIVE US INTO WAR… Unconsciously THEY ARE DRAWING US INTO WAR. THEIR POLITICAL INFLUENCE IS MOVING US IN THAT DIRECTION."The drawing into war bit was conscious, Max. I suspect you were aware of that. You just didn’t want to say it out loud.
Arguing against the creation of a Jewish State, in January 1946 Albert Einstein said this before the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry:
"The state idea is not according to my heart. I cannot understand why it is needed. It is connected with many difficulties and a narrow-mindedness. I believe it is bad."In a letter to The New York Times of 4 December 1948, Einstein condemned Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir and Likud as 'fascist... an admixture of ultra-nationalism, religious mysticism and racial superiority.'
On page 489 of his 1954 autobiography, ‘Rebirth and Destiny of Israel,’ Israel’s first Prime Minister, David Ben Gurion, said this:
"When a Jew, in America or in South Africa, talks to his Jewish companions about 'our' government, he means the government of Israel."
In 1954, Henry Hurwitz, editor of The Menorah Journal, wrote:
"Surely the liberals of Israel will now lift up their voices?... The question is no longer whether the State is to exist. The question is what kind of State it will turn out to be...On 9 December 2009, Lily Galili's essay, 'Golda Meir told Poland: Don't send sick or disabled Jews to Israel', appeared in the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz.
In all the countries of the West Jews have been and continue to be in the forefront of liberalism. There have been myriads like Heine, soldiers and leaders in all of the struggles for intellectual and spiritual liberation. This contribution of ours to Western civilization is one of the glories of the ‘Diaspora.’ Yet when Jews have gotten a chance to run a State of their own, look at it!... Can anyone really affirm it to be ‘the Switzerland of the Middle East’? We rub our eyes, some of us who were life long Zionists, and we hang our heads in shame...
This present Israel is not what we dreamed and hoped for and worked for, we who followed Herzl or Ahad Ha’Am, Brandeis or Weizmann."
This, in part, is it:
"In 1958, then-foreign minister GOLDA MEIR RAISED THE POSSIBILITY OF PREVENTING HANDICAPPED AND SICK POLISH JEWS FROM IMMIGRATING TO ISRAEL, a recently discovered Foreign Ministry document has revealed.Philosopher and author and Erich Fromm said this in New York’s Jewish Newsletter of 19 May 1959:
‘A proposal was raised in the coordination committee to inform the Polish government that we want to institute selection in aliyah, because WE CANNOT CONTINUE ACCEPTING SICK AND HANDICAPPED PEOPLE. Please give your opinion as to whether this can be explained to the Poles without hurting immigration,’ read the document, written by Meir to Israel's ambassador to Poland, Katriel Katz.
The letter, marked ‘top secret’ and written in April 1958, shortly after Meir became foreign minister, was uncovered by Prof. Szymon Rudnicki, a Polish historian at the University of Warsaw…
Rudnicki concedes that the content of the document surprised him as a scholar and a Jew. ‘This is a very cynical document,’ he said. ‘It is known that GOLDA WAS A BRUTAL POLITICIAN WHO DEFENDED INTERESTS MORE THAN PEOPLE’…
‘After 1956 the Poles imposed no limitations, and certainly did not intentionally send handicapped and aged people to Israel. That is an Israeli story, not a Polish one,’ the historian said.”
“It is often said that the Arabs fled, that they left the country voluntarily, and that they therefore bear the responsibility for losing their property and their land… Since when is that punishable by confiscation of property and by being barred from returning to the land on which a people's forefathers have lived for generations?…In the 3 August 1967, New York Review of Books, Irving Stone opined thus in his essay, 'For a new approach to the Israeli-Arab Conflict:'
The claim of the Jews to the land of Israel cannot be a realistic political claim. If all nations would suddenly claim territories in which their forefathers had lived two thousand years ago, this world would be a madhouse.”
"Israel is creating a kind of moral schizophrenia in world Jewry. In the outside world the welfare of Jewry depends on the maintenance of secular, non-racial, pluralistic societies. In Israel, Jewry finds itself defending a society in which mixed marriages cannot be legalized, in which the ideal is racial and exclusionist. Jews might fight elsewhere for their very security and existence — against principles and practices they find themselves defending in Israel.”
In the 23 July 1969 issue of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency’s Daily News Bulletin, Rabbi Joachim Prinz, the former President of the American Jewish Congress, was quoted thus:
"I have dual allegiance. My loyalty to Israel is part of me and there are many Jews who think and feel likewise."
On 22 January 1982, The Jewish Chronicle quoted Israeli novelist AB Yehoshua thus:
“Anti-Zionism is not the product of the non-Jews. On the contrary, the Gentiles have always encouraged Zionism, hoping that it would help to rid them of the Jews in their midst. Even today, in a perverse way, a real anti-Semite must be a Zionist.”On 2 July 1982, 'The Paris Declaration' was published on page 1 of Le Monde.
It was signed by Nahum Goldmann, former head of the World Zionist Organization, Philip Klutznick, former US Secretary of Commerce and President of both the World Jewish Congress and B’nai B’rith International and Pierre Mendes-France, former Prime Minister of France. This said:
"The time is urgent for mutual recognition between Israel and the Palestinian people... The war in Lebanon must stop. Israel must lift it’s siege of Beirut in order to facilitate negotiations with the PLO, leading to a political settlement. Mutual recognition must be vigorously pursued. And there should be negotiations with the aim of achieving coexistence between the Israeli and Palestinian peoples based on self-determination."In his 1987 essay, 'Sing, You Righteous', Rabbi Avigdor Miller said this:
"The State of Israel solves nothing. All 'problems' remain the same and new ones are created. For example:In the 9 July 1990 edition of Le Monde, France's Chief Rabbi, Joseph Sitruk, was quoted as responding thus to Israeli leader, Yitzhak Shamir.
The Arabian lands have been rendered uninhabitable for Jews; constant wars with neighbors must be waged, incurring huge military expenditures and loss of many lives, in addition to constant peril; it has exacerbated Jew-hatred in the nations, due to Arab influence and also to embroilment with the foreign policy of the nations; and the proponents of the State of Israel attempt to kindle a fire under the Jews in all lands in order to make their position untenable so that they emigrate to augment the population of the new State. (For example, Ben Gurion's statement in the N.Y. Times 4/22/1963. 'Jews are in truth a separate element in the midst of the peoples among whom they live an element that cannot be completely absorbed by any nation. for this reason no nation can calmly tolerate it in its midst')."
"Every French Jew is a representative of Israel... Rest assured that every Jew in France is a defender of that which you defend."
In his 1994 autobiography, 'I. Asimov: A Memoir,' Isaac Asimov says:
“Right now, there is an influx of Soviet Jews into Israel. They are fleeing because they expect religious persecution. Yet at the instant their feet touched Israeli soil, they became extreme Israeli nationalists with no pity for the Palestinians. From persecuted to persecutors in the blinking of an eye.”
On 7 March 2002, Rabbi Yisroel Yaakov Fisher, Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem, issued 'A Serious Warning on Behalf of the Rabbinical Court of Jerusalem.'This is it:
"We hereby view with great seriousness the provocations of the savages against the Arabs that endangers the entire Jewish community in the Holy Land, G-d forbid. These wild actions are carried out by provocateurs in order to pull in the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish community into the frightful provocations, the result of which is catastrophic and destructive to the Ultra-Orthodox community, and places the entire Jewish community in terrible danger, G-d forbid.This was signed by: Rabbi Israel Yaakov Fisher, Head of Rabbinical Court; Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch; Rabbi Moshe Halberstam; Rabbi Meir Brandsdorfer and Rabbi Avraham Yitzchak Ullman.
WE UNEQUIVOCALLY AND ABSOLUTELY CONDEMN AND DENOUNCE THESE SAVAGE ACTIONS.
We hereby state that Ultra-Orthodox Jews have no connection or link to the provocations against the Arabs. THEREFORE WE HEREBY ISSUE THIS EXTREMELY SERIOUS WARNING BY VIRTUE OF THE POWER OF THE HOLY TORAH TO BE EXTREMELY CAREFUL IN THIS MATTER."
In the 15 April 2002 edition of The New Statesman, John Kampfner explained how things were going to be shortly after Tony Blair assumed the leadership of the Labour Party:
“The roots of the British government's current policy towards the Middle East can be traced back to a single event, not the founding of the Jewish state, not the Six Day War, not the Oslo accords or the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, but Brighton in the autumn of 1994.Such is life in Airstrip 1.
TO DEFINE YOURSELF AS NEW LABOUR, YOU HAD TO PROVE YOUR CREDENTIALS AS PRO-BUSINESS, ANTI-TAX AND PRO-ISRAEL,' says one party official.
'Palestinian sympathies were the preserve of the old left and we quite simply had to get rid of ours IF WE WANTED TO GET ON.'
At Blair's first party conference as leader, LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ASSEMBLED IN A HUGE TURNOUT FOR ITS MAIN MEETING OF THE WEEK. EVERY ASPIRING YOUNG APPARACHIK FELT THE NEED TO ATTEND. THEY DID THEN. THEY STILL DO.”
In his 2003 essay, 'Jews Like Us,' Professor Bruce Jackson writes:
“They’re spreading poison about American Jews. Many of the people spreading this poison are Jews themselves, a relatively small group that wants to convince everybody (or at least everybody in power) that the great bulk of us think the way they do, which we don’t.
There is an ever-growing number of organizations of American Jews trying to get the word out that the press and politicians should look beyond the noisy minority. (Just glance at the web sites of Jewish Voices for Peace, Jews for Peace in Palestine and Israel, Not in My Name, Jews Against the Occupation and Brit Tzedik v’Shalom.) Thus far, they seem to have made little impact. Their activities get almost no coverage in the press and few members of Congress consider them the same kind of threat as the militant right or the neocons."
On 3 April 2003, Israeli journalist, Ari Shavit, said this in an edition of the Israeli daily, Ha’aretz:"The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, MOST OF THEM JEWISH, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history."Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, of course, didn't need any pushing at all.
On 28 May 2003, Paul Wolfowitz, one of the two neoconservatives Jews (Richard Perle was the other) who did more than anyone else to bring about the second war in Iraq, finally let the cat out of the bag when he said this in an interview with Vanity Fair:"For reasons that have a lot to do with the US government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue everyone could agree on, which was weapons of mass destruction."And then, at the IISS Asian Security Summit in Singapore three days later, Wolfowitz casually admitted to the self-interest that governed America's reasons for invading Iraq, when he said:
"Let's look at it simply. The most important difference between North Korea and Iraq is that economically, we just had no choice in Iraq. The country swims on a sea of oil".Of course, Wolfowitz wasn't ever going to admit that territorial expansion, downright spite and Israel's security, had anything to do with his wanting Iraq smashed to bits but, as confessions go, this one's a beaut.
On 20 December 2003, Gilad Atzmon, whose album, Exile, won the BBC Jazz Album of the Year in 2003, wrote the following at his own blog:
“We must begin to take the accusation that the Jewish people are trying to control the world very seriously."On 18 July 2006, Richard Cohen wrote the following in The Washington Post:
"The greatest mistake Israel could make at the moment is to forget that Israel itself is a mistake... The idea of creating a nation of European Jews in an area of Arab Muslims (and some Christians) has produced a century of warfare and terrorism of the sort we are seeing now. Israel fights Hezbollah in the north and Hamas in the south, but its most formidable enemy is history itself."On 20 September 2006, the former MP, Baroness Jenny Tonge, said this at a fringe meeting during the Lib Dem party conference:
“THE PRO-ISRAELI LOBBY HAS GOT ITS GRIPS ON THE WESTERN WORLD, ITS FINANCIAL GRIPS. I THINK THEY'VE PROBABLY GOT A GRIP ON OUR PARTY.”
In his book 'Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid', (published 25 November 2006) former US President Jimmy Carter tells us this:
"Palestinians are deprived of basic human rights, their land has been occupied, then confiscated, then colonized by the Israeli settlers...On 19 February 2007, Tony Greenstein wrote the following in The Guardian:
Israel’s continued control and colonization of Palestinian land have been the primary obstacles to a comprehensive peace agreement in the Holy Land...
The United States is squandering international prestige and goodwill and intensifying global anti-American terrorism by unofficially condoning or abetting the Israeli confiscation and colonization of Palestinian territories."
“Like the boy who cried wolf, THE CHARGE OF 'ANTI-SEMITISM' HAS BEEN MADE SO OFTEN against critics of Zionism and the Israeli state that people now have difficulty recognising the genuine article. So absurd has the situation become that the allegation of anti-semitism is even made when Jews disagree among themselves…Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia, tells us this about the 'Israel Lobby in the United Kingdom':
One of the consequences of this abuse of the term 'anti-semitism' is to devalue the currency. It renders it almost meaningless because people assume that ALLEGATIONS OF ANTI-SEMITISM ARE MERELY THE LAST-DITCH RESORT OF THOSE WHO ARE INCAPABLE OF DEFENDING THE APARTHEID WALL THAT SEPARATES THE PEOPLE OF THE WEST BANK FROM THEIR LAND, THE BULLDOZING OF CIVILIAN HOUSES, THE WANTON DESTRUCTION OF OLIVE GROVES AND CROPS, TO SAY NOTHING OF THE THEFT OF THEIR LAND…
Anti-semitism has become… a means of defaming supporters of the Palestinians and not least Jewish anti-Zionists.”
“After pop music mogul Michael Levy began fundraising for the Labour Party IT BECAME FAR MORE PRO-ISRAEL… LEVY RAN BLAIR’S 1997 CAMPAIGN FOR PRIME MINISTER AND AFTER WINNING BLAIR MADE LEVY A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS (which appointment later became part of the Cash for Honours political scandal) as well as 'special envoy' to the Middle-East…
BROWN IS EVEN MORE PRO-ISRAEL THAN BLAIR AND HAS 'ENSURED CONTINUED JEWISH FUNDING OF ‘NEW LABOUR’ BY APPOINTING FORMER LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DIRECTOR JON MENDELSOHN AS HIS CHIEF FUNDRAISER FOR THE NEXT ELECTION.
HE ALSO APPOINTED FORMER BRITISH AMBASSADOR TO ISRAEL, SIMON MCDONALD, AS HIS CHIEF FOREIGN POLICY ADVISER. HE APPOINTED SEVERAL FORMER CHAIRS OF LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL TO HIGH POSITIONS: James Purnell as Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport with oversight over the British Broadcasting Corporation and all British media; Jim Murphy as Minister of State for Europe with responsibility for the BBC World Service and the British Council; and Kim Howells as 'Middle East Minister' (Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office with oversight of Middle East affairs)…On 21 February 2008, the article, 'How Labour used the law to keep criticism of Israel secret', by Richard Norton-Taylor, was published by The Guardian.
LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL HAS A GROWING MEMBERSHIP IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS AND IS SEEN AS A LADDER TO SUCCESS FOR ASPIRING POLITICIANS.
80 PERCENT OF CONSERVATIVE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ALSO ARE CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS OF ISRAEL, INCLUDING DAVID CAMERON, LEADER OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY... THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FRIENDS OF ISRAEL WEB SITE IS MORE 'STRIDENTLY PRO-ISRAEL' THAN LABOUR, CALLING ISRAEL’S OCCUPATION OF THE WEST BANK A 'MYTH'...
In late 2007 it was revealed that DAVID ABRAHAMS, WHO WAS DEPUTY CHAIR OF LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL UNTIL 2002, HAD MADE SECRET AND ILLEGAL DONATIONS THROUGH JUNIOR EMPLOYEES OF 600,000 POUNDS STERLING (APPROXIMATELY $1.2 MILLION) TO THE LABOUR PARTY. Abrahams, 'a Jewish millionaire,' admitted in The Jewish Chronicle that he concealed his activity because 'I DIDN'T WANT JEWISH MONEY AND THE LABOUR PARTY BEING PUT TOGETHER'.
The Telegraph ran a photograph of Abrahams with Israeli former ambassador to Britain, Zvi Heifetz, and 'insinuated that ISRAEL WAS THE SOURCE OF THE ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS'. According to an article in Haaretz, several in the media have maintained there was A CONNECTION BETWEEN MONEY DONATED BY ZIONIST JEWS AND THE PRO-ISRAEL POLICY OF BRITISH PRIME MINISTERS TONY BLAIR AND GORDON BROWN.
Jon Benjamin, chief executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, told The Forward 'CLEARLY THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR IT TO TURN AGAINST US'.”
This said:
“THE FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE SUCCESSFULLY FOUGHT TO KEEP SECRET ANY MENTION OF ISRAEL CONTAINED ON THE FIRST DRAFT OF THE CONTROVERSIAL, NOW DISCREDITED IRAQ WEAPONS DOSSIER. At the heart of it was NERVOUSNESS AT THE TOP OF GOVERNMENT ABOUT ANY MENTION OF ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR ARSENAL IN AN OFFICIAL PAPER ACCUSING IRAQ OF FLOUTING THE UN'S AUTHORITY ON WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION...On 28 February 2008, Tom Segev’s 'An invention called the Jewish people' a critique of ‘When and How Was the Jewish People Invented?’ by Professor Shlomo Zand, was published in the Israeli daily, Haaretz.
The FCO had no objections to references to other countries in the margin of the Williams document...
The Information Tribunal ordered the release of the draft, without reference to Israel, observing that IT MAY HAVE PLAYED A BIGGER ROLE IN INFLUENCING THE FINAL DOSSIER THAN PREVIOUSLY SUPPOSED. The government tried to distance itself from the Williams draft."
This is it:
“Israel's Declaration of Independence states that the Jewish people arose in the Land of Israel and was exiled from its homeland. Every Israeli schoolchild is taught that this happened during the period of Roman rule, in 70 CE. The nation remained loyal to its land, to which it began to return after two millennia of exile. WRONG, says the historian Shlomo Zand… THERE NEVER WAS A JEWISH PEOPLE, only a Jewish religion, and THE EXILE ALSO NEVER HAPPENED… IT'S ALL FICTION AND MYTH THAT SERVED AS AN EXCUSE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL, he asserts.
According to Zand, the Romans did not generally exile whole nations, and most of the Jews were permitted to remain in the country… When the country was conquered by the Arabs, many of the Jews converted to Islam and were assimilated among the conquerors. It follows that THE PROGENITORS OF THE PALESTINIAN ARABS WERE JEWS. Zand did not invent this thesis; 30 years before the Declaration of Independence, IT WAS ESPOUSED BY DAVID BEN-GURION, YITZHAK BEN-ZVI AND OTHERS.
If the majority of the Jews were not exiled, how is it that so many of them reached almost every country on earth? Zand says they emigrated of their own volition or, if they were among those exiled to Babylon, remained there because they chose to. Contrary to conventional belief, the Jewish religion tried to induce members of other faiths to become Jews, which explains how there came to be millions of Jews in the world. As the Book of Esther, for example, notes, ‘And many of the people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon them.’
Zand quotes from many existing studies, some of which were written in Israel but shunted out of the central discourse. He also describes at length the Jewish kingdom of Himyar in the southern Arabian Peninsula and the Jewish Berbers in North Africa. The community of Jews in Spain sprang from Arabs who became Jews and arrived with the forces that captured Spain from the Christians, and from European-born individuals who had also become Jews.
The first Jews of Ashkenaz (Germany) did not come from the Land of Israel and did not reach Eastern Europe from Germany, but became Jews in the Khazar Kingdom in the Caucasus. Zand explains the origins of Yiddish culture: it was not a Jewish import from Germany, but the result of the connection between the offspring of the Kuzari and Germans who traveled to the East, some of them as merchants.
We find, then, that the members of a variety of peoples and races, blond and black, brown and yellow, became Jews in large numbers. According to Zand, the Zionist need to devise for them a shared ethnicity and historical continuity produced A LONG SERIES OF INVENTIONS AND FICTIONS, ALONG WITH AN INVOCATION OF RACIST THESES. Some were concocted in the minds of those who conceived the Zionist movement.”
On 24 June 2008, Joe Klein said this at his Time Magazine blog:
"You want evidence of divided loyalties? How about the 'benign domino theory' that so many Jewish neoconservatives talked to me about–off the record, of course–in the runup to the Iraq war, the idea that Israel’s security could be won by taking out Saddam, which would set off a cascade of disaster for Israel’s enemies in the region? As my grandmother would say, feh!On 29 July 2008, Joe Klein posted this at his Time Magazine blog:
Do you actually deny that the casus belli that dare not speak its name wasn’t, as I wrote in February 2003, a desire to make the world safe for Israel? Why the rush now to bomb Iran, a country that poses some threat to Israel but none–for the moment–to the United States... unless we go ahead, attack it, and the mullahs unleash Hezbollah terrorists against us? Do you really believe the mullahs would stage a nuclear attack on Israel, destroying the third most holy site in Islam and killing untold numbers of Muslims?...
Furthermore, as a Jew, I find it offensive that the American Jewish Committee would support such an ideologically unbalanced publication as Commentary, one that spouts a Likudnik bellicosity that is out of sync with the beliefs of the vast majority of American Jews.
A question to all concerned: When was the last time you opposed a policy, any policy, of the Israeli government, other than one that attempted to move toward peace?
And finally, if the Iraqi government is so wonderful, why was I advised not to carry a passport without Israeli stamps in it when I applied for my Iraqi visa?"
"I have now been called antisemitic and intellectually unstable and a whole bunch of other silly things by the folks over at the Commentary blog. They want Time Magazine to fire or silence me. This is happening because I said something that is palpably true, but unspoken in polite society: There is a small group of Jewish neoconservatives who unsuccessfully tried to get Benjamin Netanyahu to attack Saddam Hussein in the 1990s, and then successfully helped provide the intellectual rationale for George Bush to do it in 2003. Their motivations involve a confused conflation of what they think are Israel’s best interests with those of the United States. They are now leading the charge for war with Iran.On 2 January 2009, Liverpudlian comedian, Alexei Sayle, spoke out against the Israeli invasion of Gaza.
Happily, these people represent a very small sliver of the Jewish population in this country. Unhappily, their views have had an impact in the highest reaches of the Bush Administration and seem to have an influence on John McCain’s campaign as well.
Happily, the Bush Administration seems more interested in talking to the Iranians than in launching on them and, according to my Israeli friends, the Israelis are not going to do anything foolish, either. I remain proud of my Jewish heritage, a strong supporter of Israel and a realist about the slim chance of finding some common ground with the Iranians. But I am not willing to grant these ideologues the anonymity they seek.
In early 2003, during my first weeks as a Time Magazine columnist, I wrote a handful of skeptical columns about the coming war in Iraq, including this one about Israel’s security as a hidden casus belli. Then, with the troops in place and the war about to begin, I said something stupid on Tim Russert’s cable TV show reluctantly saying ok, we should proceed with the attack. It was the only statement I made in favor of the war and I quickly came to my senses but that’s no excuse. We have lost more than 4000 Americans, tens of thousands have come home grievously injured, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been killed and wounded, and we are weaker, palpably and morally, as a result.
I am not going to make the same mistake twice. I don’t think a war with Iran is coming, thank God, but this time I am not going to pull any punches. My voice isn’t very important in the grand scheme of things but I’m going to do my job and that means letting you know exactly where I stand and what I believe. I believe there are a small group of Jewish neoconservatives who are pushing for war with Iran because they believe it is in America’s long-term interests and because they believe Israel’s existence is at stake. They are wrong and recent history tells us they are dangerous. They are also bullies and I’m not going to be intimidated by them."
He was quoted thus by Sky News:
“IT IS THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE MURDERER, THE RAPIST, THE BULLY. THAT'S WHAT ISRAEL IS IN THIS SITUATION…The following day, he told the BBC that Israel's response was 'massively disproportionate', adding:
I think that Israel has an idea of itself as being noble. When you attack somebody but you have this idea of yourself that you're the good guy - you think 'how can this be?' What you do is BLAME THE PEOPLE YOU HAVE KILLED - and you hear all the time from Israeli spokespeople that THEY ARE ANGRY WITH THE PEOPLE THAT THEY HAVE MURDERED, FOR MAKING THEM MURDER THEM.”
“Stop killing people, STOP KILLING CHILDREN and then start thinking about the little things after that.”Alexei Sayle is Jewish himself.
On 6 January 2009, Yonotan Shapira, a former captain in the Israeli Air Force, spoke out as follows against the Gaza invasion:
“MY GOVERNMENT IS NOW ENGAGED IN A MASSIVE WAR CRIME KILLING HUNDREDS OF INNOCENTS… On behalf of thousands of Israelis that are demonstrating right now in the streets of Tel A Viv and Jerusalem and many other places, with Palestinians with Internationals, people from all kinds of backgrounds… are completely, completely ashamed and against this crazy assault… As Jewish people we know that YOU CANNOT KILL THE DESIRE OF PEOPLE TO BE FREE.On 12 January 2009, the Israeli writer and peace activist, Uri Avnery, wrote this in CounterPunch magazine:
WE CANNOT KILL THE DESIRE OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE PEOPLE TO LIVE IN FREEDOM…
Stop THIS MASSIVE KILLING… please, for the sake of Israel for the sake of Palestine and for the sake of the world. I want to cry and to shout and ask you people dying right now… It’s crazy that my government... is continuing this crazy assault thinking that they can kill THE DESIRE OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE TO BE FREE…
The Palestinians… THEY ARE BEING TRAPPED IN THIS OPEN-AIR PRISON FOR DECADES AND THEY CANNOT EAT, THEY CANNOT HAVE THEIR MEDICINE, THEY CANNOT GO IN, THEY CANNOT GO OUT. WE LOCK THEM THERE IN A DEEP GHETTO… WE ARE LOCKING ONE AND A HALF MILLION PEOPLE FOR SO LONG AND WE TREAT THEM AS ANIMALS AND THIS IS THE RESULT.”
“The atrocities are a direct result of the war plan. This reflects the personality of Ehud Barak, aOn 13 January 2009, the Israeli historian and Oxford University professor, Avi Shlaim, said this on Channel 4 News:
man whose way of thinking and actions are clear evidence of what is called ‘moral insanity,’ a sociopathic disorder...
A person without imagination, like Barak cannot imagine how decent people around the world react to actions like the killing of whole extended families, the destruction of houses over the heads of their inhabitants, the rows of boys and girls in white shrouds ready for burial, the reports about people bleeding to death over days because ambulances are not allowed to reach them, the killing of doctors and medics on their way to save lives, the killing of UN drivers bringing in food.
The pictures of the hospitals, with the dead, the dying and the injured lying together on the floor for lack of space, have shocked the world. No argument has any force next to an image of a wounded little girl lying on the floor, twisting with pain and crying out: 'Mama! Mama!...
The planners thought that they could stop the world from seeing these images by forcibly preventing press coverage. The Israeli journalists, to their shame, agreed to be satisfied with the reports and photos
provided by the Army Spokesman, as if they were authentic news, while they themselves remained miles away from the events. Foreign journalists were not allowed in either...
What will be seared into the consciousness of the world will be the image of ISRAEL AS A BLOOD-STAINED MONSTER, READY AT ANY MOMENT TO COMMIT WAR CRIMES AND NOT PREPARED TO ABIDE BY ANY MORAL RESTRAINTS. This will have severe consequences for our long-term future, our standing in the world, our chance of achieving peace and quiet.”
“The current offensive in Gaza is the climax of the Israeli tendency to shun diplomacy and compromise and to rely overwhelmingly on BRUTE MILITARY FORCE.On 15 January 2009, the article, Did Privatization Increase the Russian Death Rate? By R.M. Schneiderman, appeared in The New York Times' Business section. Schneiderman answered his own question thus:
The key to Israel’s intransigence in the conflict is UNCRITICAL AMERICAN SUPPORT. Today ISRAEL IS, GETTING AWAY, LITERALLY, WITH MURDER IN GAZA because there is no restraint from America. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN LESS AMERICAN RESTRAINT ON ISRAEL IN THE HISTORY OF THIS TRAGIC CONFLICT.
One recent example of THIS BLIND AMERICAN SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL is the Security Council cease-fire resolution which CONDOLEEZA RICE SUPPORTED, MADE A SPEECH IN FAVOUR and everyone thought America was going to vote for it and yet, AT THE LAST MINUTE, BUSH AND CHENEY VETOED, didn’t veto the resolution but AMERICA ABSTAINED! THAT SENT A CLEAR SIGNAL TO ISRAEL THAT IT CAN CONTINUE WITH THIS INSANE OFFENSIVE.
The only thing that might change is American public opinion, as a result of EXCESSIVE ISRAELI BRUTALITY, gradually changing and that would weaken the power of the Israel lobby in Washington and eventually it might have an effect on American foreign policy towards the region…
Here is the crucial point, THIS IS AN UNNECESSAY AND ILLEGAL WAR because... in July of last year Egypt brokered a cease-fire. The cease-fire succeeded. THE CEASE-FIRE WAS A STUNNING SUCCESS, CONTRARY TO ISRAELI PROPAGANDA. Before cease-fire came into effect, 170 KASSAM ROCKETS A MONTH WERE FIRED FROM GAZA ON ISRAEL After the cease-fire came into effect, for the next 4 months THE NUMBER DROPPED TO 3 A MONTH. Again CONTRARY TO ISRAEL’S PROPAGANDA, IT WAS NOT HAMAS THAT BROKE THE CEASE-FIRE, IT WAS ISRAEL WHO BROKE THE CEASE-FIRE BY LAUNCHING A RAID INTO GAZA AND KILLING SIX HAMAS MEN.”
"That’s what a new study published online today in The Lancet, an independent medical journal, says. The authors of the study write that THE RAPID AND WIDESPREAD PRIVATIZATION OF STATE INDUSTRIES IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION AND EASTERN BLOC COUNTRIES DURING THE EARLY 1990S INCREASED THE DEATH RATE 13 PERCENT...Jeffrey Sachs is Jewish. As are most of the 'Oligarchs' who plundered the wealth of the ordinary people and profited so obscenely from Russia's particularly nasty variation on the privatisation scam. A good few of these Oligarchs (Roman Abramovich, Boris Berezovsky etc.) are now living in London.
As communism collapsed in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the former Eastern bloc countries saw dire health consequences: MORE THAN THREE MILLION PEOPLE DIED PREMATURELY, according to the United Nations... As the former Eastern bloc countries began making the transition from communism to capitalism... some (economists) advocated 'SHOCK THERAPY,' a term that denotes an immediate and rapid transition to capitalism...
JEFFREY SACHS, the director of Columbia University’s Earth Institute, A LEADING ADVOCATE OF THE 'SHOCK THERAPY' SCHOOL OF THOUGHT, SERVED AS AN ECONOMIC ADVISER TO A NUMBER OF THE EASTERN BLOC COUNTRIES, including Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Russia.' More...
Anyway, that's what Privatisation did for the ordinary Soviet citizen. The Tory and New Labour versions of the great privatisation rip-off didn't do much for the least well off over here either.
In his 19 January 2009 article, ‘Exterminate all the Brutes: Gaza 2009,’ professor Noam Chomsky said this:
“Israel is deliberately turning itself into one of the most hated countries in the world, and is also losing the allegiance of the population of the West, including younger American Jews, who are unlikely to tolerate its persistent shocking crimes for long. Decades ago, I wrote that those who call themselves ‘supporters of Israel’ are in reality supporters of ITS MORAL DEGENERATION AND PROBABLE ULTIMATE DESTRUCTION. Regrettably, that judgment looks more and more plausible.In a 20 January 2009 interview for 'Revolution Online', Richard Falk said this:
Meanwhile we are quietly observing a rare event in history, what the late Israeli sociologist Baruch Kimmerling called ‘politicide,’ THE MURDER OF A NATION AT OUR HANDS.”
"I think that my life’s work in a sense has been associated with helping or identifying with those who are victims of injustice. If we look at the world today, there are many victims of injustice. But I think the Palestinians stand out as the most victimized people in the world.On 4 February 2009, Melanie Philips said this in The Daily Mail:
And symbolically, their struggle is one that engages people of conscience everywhere in the world in a manner that resembles the way the anti-apartheid movement worked effectively to undermine South Africa’s claims of sovereignty and legitimacy. And I hope that this small role that I play contributes to that kind of process on behalf of the Palestinians."
“Sometimes you have to pinch yourself to remember that Britain has historically always been the cradle of liberty. For TODAY WE SEEM TO BE SLIDING INEXORABLY INTO A CULTURE OF CONTROL WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY FAMILIAR TO THE STASI OR THE KGB...In 'Israel’s war crimes,' published in Le Monde's English edition in March 2009, Professor Richard Falk, UN special rapporteur on human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, said this:
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS NOW THE GOVERNING CHARACTERISTIC OF PUBLIC SECTOR INSTITUTIONS SUCH AS THE BBC AND THE NHS, ALONG WITH AN INTELLIGENTSIA DETERMINED UPON A DRACONIAN PROCESS OF SOCIAL ENGINEERING AIMED AT CHANGING NOT JUST SOCIETY BUT HUMAN NATURE ITSELF...
BEHAVIOUR SUCH AS THIS HAS ALWAYS BEEN A KEY FEATURE OF POLICE STATES AND TOTALITARIAN REGIMES. THE STASI OR THE KGB GAINED MUCH OF THEIR POWER OVER THE POPULATION THEY TYRANNISED BY GETTING PEOPLE TO INFORM ON EACH OTHER, USING SUCH INFORMERS TO BRING FORWARD EVIDENCE OF 'THOUGHT CRIMES' from private or overheard conversations. Such use of informers SETS PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER in a climate of permanent and corrosive suspicion.
Destroying the trust which is the basis of relationships, it is thus A PRINCIPAL MEANS OF CONTROLLING THE POPULATION...
It is THIS COMBINATION OF LUNACY AND COERCION which leads one to think that the land of those great apostles of free thinking, John Milton and John Locke, is fast TURNING INTO A NIGHTMARE STRAIGHT OUT OF THE PAGES OF GEORGE ORWELL OR FRANZ KAFKA."
"It is my view that this surfacing of criminal charges against Israel during and after its attacks on Gaza resulted in major gains on the legitimacy front for the Palestinians. The widespread popular perceptions of Israeli criminality, especially the sense of waging war against a defenceless population with modern weaponry, has prompted people around the world to propose boycotts, divestments and sanctions. This mobilisation exerts pressure on governments and corporations to desist from relations with Israel, and is reminiscent of the worldwide anti-apartheid campaign that did so much to alter the political landscape in South Africa."He has also said this:
“I think the Palestinians stand out as the most victimized people in the world.”In his March 2009 history, World in Crisis, Gabriel Kolko says this:
"The result of the creation of a state called Israel was abysmal. Jews from Poland have nothing in common with Germans and neither has anything to do with those from the Arab world...On 7 March 2009, Stephen Glover said this in The Daily Mail:
The large majority of Israelis are not in the least Jewish in the cultural sense, are scarcely socialist in any sense, and daily life and the way people live is no different in Israel than it is in Chicago or Amsterdam. There is simply no rational reason that justifies the state’s creation.
The outcome is a small state with a military ethos that pervades all aspects of Israel’s culture, its politics and, above all, its response to the existence of Arabs in its midst and at its borders. From its inception, the ideology of the early Zionists, of Labor Zionism as well as the rightist Revisionism that Vladimir Jabotinsky produced, EMBODIED A COMMITMENT TO VIOLENCE, erroneously called self-defense, and A VIRTUAL HYSTERIA."
"Twice this week I have been reminded of a peculiar quality of the British. WE LOVE TO PRAISE, HONOUR AND REWARD THOSE WHO DON'T REALLY LIKE US - WHO MAY INDEED HATE US.'We love to praise, honour and reward those who don't really like us - who may indeed hate us', says Glover. This, of course, is not true. We have never wanted anything to do with 'those who don't really like us', much less anyone who 'hates' us. However, the powers-that-be do indeed love those who hate us. The better to dismay and demoralise those THEY, themselves, hate.
While Gordon Brown was sweet-talking the Americans, it was announced that an honorary knighthood is being conferred on 77-year-old Senator Edward Kennedy... One might suppose that Mr Kennedy... was an old friend of this country. BUT HE ISN'T... During the Seventies he portrayed the British role in Northern Ireland as one of virtual occupation, and even suggested that the majority Protestant population be encouraged to 'return' to Britain...
91-year-old historian Eric Hobsbawm... has lived in this country since 1933... One might suppose that Mr Hobsbawm was a kindly old gentleman who would never harm a flea. A panegyric by Seumas Milne in The Guardian newspaper called him Britain's 'greatest living historian'. HE IS ALMOST INVARIABLY SO DESCRIBED... The truth about Mr Hobsbawm is almost the exact opposite of what has been stated. For most of his adult life Mr HOBSBAWM SUPPORTED THE SOVIET UNION, whose methods made MI5 look like a bunch of amateurs...
He either turned a blind eye to Soviet atrocities, OR JUSTIFIED THEM. He defended... the Russian invasion of Hungary in 1956. He deprecated Nikita Khrushchev's denunciation of Stalin's totalitarian methods. Long after decent fellow communists had disowned Soviet communism, HOBSBAWM REFUSED TO CONDEMN IT. In his book On History, published in 1997, he wrote: 'Fragile as the communist systems turned out to be, only a limited, even minimal, use of force was necessary to maintain them from 1957 until 1989.' Somehow, he had forgotten about the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968.
Asked whether 'the radiant tomorrow' promised by Stalin would have justified 'the loss of 15 to 20 million people', HOBSBAWM SIMPLY REPLIED: 'YES'...
Despite all this - despite his well-publicised support for an inhumane regime - HE IS WIDELEY TEATED AS A GRAND, AS WELL AS A DELIGHTFUL OLD MAN, WHOSE VIEWS DESERVE TO BE VENERATED.
One may wonder why Hobsbawm should seek an honour from a country for which he has never shown much affection, and whose interests he undermined during the Cold War through his support for the Soviet Union... It would be as pointless to demand that he be stripped of his Companion of Honour as it would be to ask Gordon Brown to think again about Senator Kennedy's honorary knighthood. NEW LABOUR HAS EMBRACED BOTH THESE GHASTLY MEN WITH OPEN EYES.”
On 9 March 2009, Roger Cohen wrote the following in The New York Times:
"I’m convinced the 'Mad Mullah' caricature of Iran and likening of any compromise with it to Munich 1938 — a position popular in some American Jewish circles — is misleading and dangerous."In the 24 July edition of The Daily Mail, Peter Oborne told us this:
"Claims that French president Nicolas Sarkozy has been in receipt of massive cash backhanders should come as no surprise to attentive students of European politics... A safe rule of thumb is to assume that ANY TOPFLIGHT POLITICIAN FROM FRANCE, ITALY OR GERMANY IS A CRIMINAL WHO OUGHT TO BE SERVING A LONG STRETCH BEHIND BARS.On 1 September 2009, the Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, was quoted thus by The Mirror:
IN ITALY, GOVERNMENT HAS LONG BEEN A LARGE-SCALE GANGSTER ENTERPRISE. Senior judges openly accuse PRIME MINISTER SILVIO BERLUSCONI OF INTERVENING IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM TO ESCAPE CONVICTION in three ongoing corruption trials.
I remember once listening open-mouthed a senior member of John Major's Cabinet spelt out to me the evidence he had been shown which proved (so he told me) that FRANCOIS MITTERAND HAD ARRANGED THE MURDER OF AT LEAST THREE OF HIS POLITICAL OPPONENTS.
CHANCELLOR HELMUT KOHL OF GERMANY WAS AWASH WITH SLUSH FUNDS AND HIS PROSECUTION (AND LIKELY JAIL) WAS HALTED ONLY WHEN A COURT DECIDED THAT IT WAS BEST TO DROP ALL CHARGES IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST.
Given this record (and there are scores of other examples) IT IS NO WONDER THAT TONY BLAIR, PETER MANDELSON AND SO MANY OF THEIR MORALLY SQUALID NEW LABOUR ASSOCIATES REMAIN SUCH ENORMOUS ENTHUSIASTS FOR THE EUROPEAN IDEAL."
“In 1951, six countries gathered together with the aim ‘to make war unthinkable‘. Since then, the European Union has helped to build peace and security across 27 countries… THE BIG CHALLENGES OF THE MODERN WORLD NEED MORE, NOT LESS, INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION.‘Xenophobia and hatred.’ Most British Nationalists would, I presume, feel something akin to ‘hatred‘ for our treacherous politicians and the PC Crowd. But then, as these have been at war with the British people for quite some time now, why wouldn't we be?
POLAND IS THE COUNTRY MY MOTHER CAME FROM… Poles are proud of their history, heritage and national identity. But they rightly see no conflict between pride in their country and wanting to be part of European co-operation. NOR SHOULD WE…
EXTREMISTS LIKE THE BNP OPPOSE WHAT EUROPE STANDS FOR - it goes against their xenophobia and hatred. THEY ARE OUT OF STEP WITH MODERN BRITAIN.”
As for the ‘xenophobia‘ bit, the Miliband types fear and despise the Brit who dares to stick up for his own far more than that Briton fears and despises the foreigner. That's why they call us nasty names and do their damnedest to convince the foolish that those who would put the downtrodden Brit first in his own land are the bad guys.
Our Foreign Secretary is a second-generation Jewish immigrant. Figure it out.
On 14 September 2009, Judge Anthony Goldstaub QC was quoted thus by The Daily Mail:
"You have turned to Islam and THIS PROMISES WELL FOR YOUR FUTURE, particularly as you are now an adherent of a religion which respects women and self-discipline.”The Mail added:
"Goldstaub strongly criticised Wood, 34, for pleading not guilty at his trial which meant his victim was put through the ordeal of having to tell 12 strangers 'the most intimate details'... 'This she did with dignity and courage,' said Judge Goldstaub. 'You, through your counsel, called her a liar and suggested she had invented rape.'Yep, commend a lying rapist, with previous convictions, for becoming a Muslim. That'll turn him into a nice person alright. Like the Muslims that blew us up on 7/7/2005 perhaps, or the paedophiles who groom our little girls up North, or the drug dealers who bring the heroin into the country from Afghanistan and sell it on our streets.
The judge added that Wood, who had previous convictions for indecent assault on underage girls and for violence, had shown no remorse and still protested his innocence about the attack."
Such attitudes as Goldstaub's really do 'promise well' for the 'future' of the bad guys, I reckon. As for ours now, that'd be something else entirely.
On 17 September 2009, the South African Judge, Richard Goldstone, head of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, said this in The New York Times:
"In the fighting in Gaza... many civilians unnecessarily died and even more were seriously hurt.If anyone out there wishes to accuse Judge Goldstone of anti-semitism I'm afraid you're out of luck. Goldstone is Jewish himself.
In Israel, THREE CIVILIANS WERE KILLED and hundreds wounded by rockets from Gaza fired by Hamas and other groups... In Gaza, HUNDREDS OF CIVILIANS DIED. (B'Tselem, an Israeli human rights group, said 1,387 Palestinians died, over half of them civilians and 252 of them children) They died from disproportionate attacks on legitimate military targets AND FROM ATTACKS ON HOSPITALS AND OTHER CIVILIAN STRUCTURES. They died from precision weapons like missiles from aerial drones as well as from heavy artillery. REPEATEDLY, THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES FAILED TO ADEQUATELY DISTINGUISH BETWEEN COMBATANTS AND CIVILIANS…
Our fact-finding team found that IN MANY CASES ISRAEL COULD HAVE DONE MUCH MORE TO SPARE CIVILIANS without sacrificing its stated and legitimate military aims. IT SHOULD HAVE REFRAINED FROM ATTACKING CLEARLY CIVILIAN BUILDINGS, and from actions that might have resulted in a military advantage but at the cost of too many civilian lives. In these cases, Israel must investigate and Hamas is obliged to do the same. They must examine what happened and appropriately punish any soldier or commander found to have violated the law.
Unfortunately... while Israel has begun investigations into alleged violations by its forces in the Gaza conflict, THEY ARE UNLIKELY TO BE SERIOUS AND OBJECTIVE...
Pursuing justice in this case is essential because NO STATE OR ARMED GROUP SHOULD BE ABOVE THE LAW. Western governments in particular face a challenge because they have pushed for accountability in places like Darfur, but NOW MUST DO THE SAME WITH ISRAEL, AN ALLY and a democratic state.
FAILING TO PURSUE JUSTICE FOR SERIOUS VIOLATIONS DURING THE FIGHTING WILL HAVE A DEEPLY CORROSIVE EFFECT ON INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE, AND REVEAL AN UNACCEPTABLE HYPOCRISY. As a service to the hundreds of civilians who needlessly died and for the equal application of international justice, THE PERPETRATORS OF SERIOUS VIOLATIONS MUST BE HELD TO ACCOUNT."
On 17 September 2009, former Israeli leader Ehud Barak said this in the Israeli daily, Yedioth Ahronoth:
"I am not among those who believe Iran is an existential issue for Israel...And yet, on the same day, The Telegraph quoted Ephraim Sneh, Israel's former Deputy Defence Minister, thus:
ISRAEL IS STRONG, I DON'T SEE ANYONE WHO COULD POSE AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT."
"The Israeli government is the only entity that is responsible for the existence of the Jewish people. Iran has been explicit in its hostility to Israel time and again. They would use these weapons… We believe that Iran has the capacity and the delivery capability for nuclear weapons. They can proceed to production.On 18 September 2009, The Jewish Chronicle told us this:
WE HAVE GOT TWO MONTHS TO ACT, BEFORE THE END OF 2009... WE CANNOT TAKE THE RISK."
“The Board of Deputies complained to the BBC over perceived inaccuracies and lack of context in The Frankincense Trail, in which presenter Kate Humble followed the trade route which first connected the Arab world with the West. In an episode shown on BBC2 on September 3, she referred to an incident in 524CE. She said the Yemeni Jewish Himyar tribe, led by King Dhu Nuwas, set upon Christian residents of a village in Saudi Arabia.On 28 September 2009, film columnist, Patrick Goldstein, speaking out against the arrest and possible extradition from Switzerland of film director, Roman Polanski, said this in The LA Times:
Ms Humble said THE JEWS HAD OFFERED THE VILLAGERS THE CHOICE BETWEEN CONVERSION TO JUDAISM OR DEATH AND THAT 20,000 CHRISTIANS HAD THEN BEEN MASSACRED…
The BBC said the information had been obtained from an authentic source and it stood by the content…
Professor Dan Shapira, of Bar-Ilan University, said… ‘There is a street in Jerusalem named after Joseph Dhu Nuwas. People from the Jewish Kingdom of Himyar are among those buried at Beit-She’arim in Israel.’
A BBC spokeswoman said: ‘The source was a surviving text written by the Bishop of Beth Arsham in 524 CE.”
"You'd hope that LA County prosecutors had BETTER THINGS TO DO THAN CAUSE AN INTERNATIONAL FUROR BY HOUNDING A FILM DIRECTOR for a 32-year-old sex crime…I don’t think that’s a tragedy, Mr Goldstein. I think that’s justice.
Whether the LA County district attorney's office has its way or not, it is not a story that can have a happy ending. I THINK POLANSKI HAS ALREADY PAID A HORRIBLE, SOUL-WRENCHING Price for the infamy surrounding his actions. THE REAL TRAGEDY is that he will always, till his death, be snubbed and stalked and confronted by people who think the price he has already paid isn't enough."
Columnist, Anne Applebaum, said this in The Washington Post on the same day:
"To put him on trial or keep him in jail does not serve society in general or his victim in particular."I beg to differ, Ms Applebaum. I think putting Polanski on trial and jailing him would, indeed, 'serve society in general' by sending out a powerful message that a creepy, untouchable elite was as subject to the law as the rest of us. Particularly when a minor had been raped by the creep in question.
Film mogul Harvey Weinstein was quoted thus by The Guardian:
"We're calling on every film-maker we can to help fix this terrible situation.”It was a 'terrible situation' that would have been fixed in 1978, Mr Weinstein, if Polanski hadn’t fled the wrath of the American authorities. Now he should, but probably won’t, pay the price of the crime he committed.
Polanski, Weinsten, Goldstein and Applebaum are Jewish.
PS. Where do you think Polanski fled to all those years ago? He escaped to England.
On 1 October 2009, The Jewish Chronicle quoted 'Schools Secretary, Ed Balls thus:
“THE MONEY WE ARE INVESTING IS PROBABLY THE BEST INVESTMENT OUR DEPARTMENT MAKES FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUNG PEOPLE. To learn about the Holocaust is firmly part of the curriculum and HET (the Holocaust Education Trust) brings it alive FOR YOUNG PEOPLE WITH MESSAGES THAT ARE VERY POWERFUL FOR OUR COUNTRY TODAY.”The JC added:
"Mr Balls and his wife Yvette Cooper, the Work and Pensions Secretary, were among the 300 guests at the Holocaust Educational Trust dinner in central London... THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN, SCHOOLS AND FAMILIES IS GIVING THE HET £1.5 MILLION ANNUALLY FOR ITS LESSONS FROM AUSCHWITZ PROJECT, through which sixth-formers visit the death camp site. HET ALSO AIMS TO RAISE AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING THROUGH TEACHER TRAINING and has taken more than 7,000 staff and pupils to Auschwitz.I wonder if the 'Lessons from Auschwitz' project will be pointing out that the original memorial stone erected at Auschwitz in 1948, stipulated that 4,000,000 people had died there, whereas the stone that replaced it in 1990 said 1,500,000 had died?
But HET chairman LORD JANNER SAYS THERE IS MORE TO BE DONE... He was concerned at rising antisemitism and the ever-dwindling number of survivors to relay their stories to new generations. 'WE WORK AGAINST RACISM OF ALL KINDS AND WE CAN’T LET PEOPLE FORGET ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED. We’ve been very lucky to hear survivors’ stories but they are dying off, so WE HAVE TO TRAIN MORE PEOPLE'."
Nowadays, the Auschwitz site cites figures that add up to 1,069,000 Jews having been 'deported' to the camp at some point. Not all of whom will have died there, I imagine.
Anyway, 4,000,000 in 1948, 1,500,000 in 1990. It doesn't take a genius to work out that if 2,500,000 was lopped off the Auschwitz total in 1990, 2,500,000 should have been taken away from the 6 million overall figure at the same time.
That never happened, did it? Oh, the historians knew but the rest of us? Nope. The rest of us were instructed to carry right on believing the officially sanctioned 6-million-died lie. Right up to the present day we have been so instructed.
Right up to when Ed Balls said that the money the government was investing in the Holocause Educational Trust was the 'best investment our department makes for the future of young people.'
Ed Balls is the kind of person who would call you a 'Holocaust Denier' if you said that the overall total of Jewish dead, killed by the Nazis in WWII, couldn't possibly have exceeded 3,500,000. No matter what proofs you put before him. No matter how incontrovertible the truth was that you introduced him to.
As for the 'HET' (aiming) 'to raise awareness and understanding,' well, has anyone out there ever heard this bunch admitting that the 6m figure is an exaggeration? You have not. But you will have heard them remorselessly insisting that the 'Holocaust,' and the 'six million' that died because of it, be remembered forever and ever, Amen.
That's not what I call raising 'awareness and understanding.' That's what I call a lie. A State sponsored lie.
Six million Jews did not die at the hands of the bad guys in WWII. Many died but six million did not. And the powers-that-be, those who see to it that you get called nasty names if you dare utter a figure less than the one THEY insist upon, know it.
THEY know it. THEY just don't want you to know it.
I'll tell you what Ed Balls and Yvette Cooper know. They know which side their bagel is buttered on. And it isn't on the side of the inconvenient facts, that's for sure.
Pictured below is the memorial stone that commemorated the Auschwitz dead from 1948 to 1990:
The plaque below replaced the 1948 plaque in 1990.
Just in case you haven't got it yet, here is the math:4,000,000 - 1,500,000 = 2,500,000.
6,000,000 - 2,500,000 = 3,500,000.
Nowadays the Auschwitz web site sais 1.1m people died there.
On 1 October 2009, Boy George (who has a star of David tattooed on his head) was quoted thus by Totally Jewish News:
“I JUST WANT TO BE JEWISH. My manager's Jewish and I have a lot of Jewish people in my life."Some Jews like their Gentiles gay.
On 1 October 2009, David Miliband, the UK's Foreign Secretary, was quoted thus by Totally Jewish News:
"This will never become a country where ministers of Israel are unable to come and have proper dialogue with the government of the United Kingdom."Totally Jewish added:
"Foreign Secretary David Miliband this week insisted Britain would never be a country Israeli ministers would be unable to visit for talks, hours after Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak narrowly avoided arrest over war crimes allegations.On 2 October 2009, 'Is it Better to be Mixed-Race' was presented by Aarathi Prasad on Channel 4 TV:
Palestinian groups, the Mezan Center for Human Rights in Gaza City and Ramallah-based al-Haq, called for an arrest warrant to be issued for the veteran politician during his visit to the UK to meet Miliband and Gordon Brown and to address the annual Labour Friends of Israel reception at the party's Brighton conference.
But on Tuesday afternoon, Westminster Magistrates Court Deputy District Judge Daphne Wickham accepted the arguments of the British Foreign Office and stated that Barak 'has immunity from prosecution as he would not be able to perform his functions efficiently if he were the subject of criminal proceedings in this jurisdiction'."
During the course of this documentary, this was said:
“MANY MIXED-RACE PEOPLE SEEM TO BE SO GIFTED... MIXED-RACE PEOPLE MIGHT HAVE A BIOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE. Could there be something happening at the level of their genes that MAKES THEM SO SPECIAL? IS IT BETTER TO BE MIXED-RACE?...Here are a few examples of the standard of Mr Ziv’s 'Between the Lines:'
There’s a controversial new idea that's not going to please the BNP one little bit. It's a theory outlined in a book called, ‘BREEDING BETWEEN THE LINES’ by science writer, ALON ZIV. It claims that MIXED-RACE PEOPLE ARE BORN WITH A BIOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE, THE RESULT OF THEIR GENETIC DIVERSITY."
“After 18 holes, Tiger Woods probably SMELLS BETTER than Phil Mickelson”.
“Julia Roberts was MORE LIKELY TO HAVE AN ORGASM with Benjamin Bratt than with Lyle Lovett”.
“Odds are, Lenny Kravitz LOST HIS VIRGINITY EARLIER than Justin Timberlake.”And the concluding sentence:
“Our DIVERSITY IS A GIFT, and TO KEEP OURSELVES SEPARATED AND COMPARTMENTALIZED WOULD BE TO WASTE THAT GIFT.”Alon Ziv is Jewish.
On 14 October 2009, Simon Duke wrote the following in The Daily Mail:
"City bank Goldman Sachs is expected to confirm tomorrow that BONUSES WILL SMASH ALL RECORDS IN 2009, JUST A YEAR AFTER THE GOVERNMENT RESCUED THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM FROM OBLIVION...Sherwood, one of two 'Masters of the Universe' working for Goldman Sachs cited in Simon Duke's article, is Jewish. The other, Peter Sutherland, is, truly, a credit-crunching wallet-stuffer of the highest international order. His 'Father of Globalisation' CV suggests he would rank much higher in the NWO hierarchy than ubiquitous factotums like Blair or Brown, for example.
The return to business as usual for the so-called 'Masters of the Universe' of the Square Mile will anger the MILLIONS OF FAMILIES whose finances have been devastated by the financial crisis...
THE WALL STREET GIANT IS ON COURSE TO LAVISH £14 BILLION ON PAY AND BONUSES ON STAFF THIS YEAR following a surge in profits between July and September… GOLDMAN'S 5,500 UK WORKERS ARE NOW SET TO POCKET AN AVERAGE OF ALMOST £500,000 EACH for this year - the highest rewards in the firm's 140-year history...
High-flyers, such as UK boss MICHAEL SHERWOOD, COULD EARN BONUSES STRETCHING INTO EIGHT FIGURES."
Check out what Wikipedia has to say about him here...
Here’s a novel idea: instead of putting the price of everything up and taxing the innocent majority up to the hilt, tax the greedy bankers, the hedge fund managers; the private equity wallahs and the biggest of trough-gobbling big businessmen up to the hilt. Let's have 90 PER CENT OF THEIR INCOME off them! And make the tax retrospective - all the way back to 1979, when Margaret Thatcher began institutionalising fat cat greed!
That’d get rid of the national debt in a flash. And the process would be a just one - As opposed to the injustice of making the decent majority pay for the crimes of an amoral elite minority, that is.
Besides, THEY would still have their 10 per cent, wouldn’t THEY? 10 percent of a billion is still a hundred mil.
99.999 per cent of us would be happy enough with that, I reckon.
On 22 October 2009, Voltaire.Net told us that the EU President, Javier Solana, speaking at the Facing Tomorrow conference convened by Israeli President, Shimon Peres, had said this:
"Allow me to say that ISRAEL IS A MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN UNION without being a member of its institutions… an INTEGRAL PART OF ALL EU PROGRAMMES".On 27 October 2009, Amnesty International's Donatella Rovera was quoted thus by the BBC News:
“Water is a basic need and a right, but FOR MANY PALESTINIANS OBTAINING EVEN POOR-QUALITY, SUBSISTENCE-LEVEL QUANTITIES OF WATER HAS BECOME A LUXURY THAT THEY CAN BARELY AFFORD."The BBC added:
“ISRAEL IS DENYING PALESTINIANS ACCESS TO EVEN THE BASIC MINIMUM OF CLEAN, SAFE WATER, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL SAYS. While Israeli settlers in the West Bank enjoy lush gardens and swimming pools, Amnesty describes a series of Israeli measures it says are discriminating against Palestinians:On 31 October 2009, John Bercow, the Speaker of the House of Commons, said this to the 'youth parliament' that had been convened for the first time in the Commons:
ISRAEL HAS 'ENTIRELY APPROPRIATED THE PALESTINIANS' SHARE OF THE JORDAN RIVER' AND USES 80% OF A KEY SHARED AQUIFER. West Bank Palestinians are not allowed to drill wells without Israeli permits, which are 'often impossible' to obtain. Rainwater HARVESTING CISTERNS ARE 'OFTEN DESTROYED BY THE ISRAELI ARMY'. Israeli soldiers confiscated a water tanker from villagers who were trying to remain in land Israel had declared a 'closed military area'."
"The Nazis in Germany in the 30s, and the neo-Nazis today, seek to scapegoat whole communities as they peddle their message of hate and scurrilously appeal for support. They depend on either ignorance, or apathy. And THE COUNTER TO IGNORANCE AND APATHY IS EDUCATION…The Independent commented thus:
I'M UNDER ABSOLUTELY NO OBLIGATION WHATSOEVER TO BE IMPARTIAL as between the forces of democracy on the one hand and the forces of evil on the other. I do feel very, very, very strongly AS SOMEONE FROM A JEWISH BACKGROUND that the evil of the BNP is that its whole politics is based upon and driven by hate. That is a poison which we could well do without."
"CENTURIES OF POLITICAL IMPARTIALITY DEMANDED OF THE SPEAKER WERE ROLLED BACK IN SPECTACULAR FASHION BY MR BERCOW YESTERDAY. IT IS THOUGHT TO BE THE FIRST TIME THAT A SPEAKER HAS EVER LAUNCHED SUCH AN ASSAULT ON A LEGAL PARTY."The Jews don’t like it when the citizens of a country they have taken control of want the country back. Thus the “democracy” (Jews) v 'evil' (BNP) deceit. Israel’s a democracy and we all know what’s been happening there for the last 61 years.
Anyway, you heard it from the horse’s a**e. 'The counter to ignorance and apathy is education.'
Get finding out, folks. Before it’s too late.
In November 2009, The Washington Report's Alison Weir reported thus:
"In August Sweden’s largest daily newspaper published an article containing grisly evidence suggesting that Israel had been taking Palestinian internal organs. The article, by veteran photojournalist Donald Bostrom, called for an international investigation...
Israel immediately accused Bostrom and the newspaper of 'anti-Semitism,' and charged that suggesting Israelis could be involved in the illicit removal of body parts constituted a modern 'blood libel' (medieval stories of Jews killing people for their blood). Numerous Israeli partisans repeated these accusations, including Commentary’s Jonathan Tobin, who asserted that the story was 'merely the tip of the iceberg in terms of European funded and promoted anti-Israel hate'...
The fact is, however, that Israeli organ harvesting—sometimes with Israeli governmental funding and the participation of high Israeli officials, prominent Israeli physicians, and Israeli ministries—has been documented for many years...
Nancy Scheper-Hughes is Chancellor’s Professor of Medical Anthropology at the University of California Berkeley, the founder of Organ Watch... While Scheper-Hughes emphasizes that traffickers and procurers come from numerous nations and ethnicities, including Americans and Arabs, she is unflinchingly honest in speaking about the Israeli connection: 'Israel is at the top,' she states. 'It has tentacles reaching out worldwide.'
In a lecture last year sponsored by New York’s PBS 13 Forum, Scheper-Hughes explained that Israeli organ traffickers, 'had and still have a pyramid system at work that’s awesome... they have brokers everywhere, bank accounts everywhere; they’ve got recruiters, they’ve got translators, they’ve got travel agents who set up the visas.'
Lest this sound simply like a successful international concern, it’s important to understand the nature of such a business. As Scheper-Hughes describes it, organ trafficking consists of 'paying the poor and the hungry to slowly dismantle their bodies.'
Organ traffickers prey on the world’s poorest, most desperate citizens—slum dwellers, inhabitants of dying villages, people without means or hope. Traffickers promise them what seem like astronomical sums of money (from $1,000 to $10,000)—which they frequently don’t even deliver—in return for vital internal organs...
Whether or not there have ever been organ-inspired murders in Israel as it appears there have elsewhere, numerous groups around the world are urging an international investigation into Israel’s handling of Palestinian bodies in its custody.
However, the Israeli government and its powerful advocates abroad, who regularly block investigations into Israeli actions, are doing their utmost to prevent this."
On 8 November 2009, Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of 'the world's most powerful, and most secretive, investment bank,' Goldman Sachs was quoted thus by The Sunday Times:“I KNOW I COULD SLIT MY WRISTS AND PEOPLE WOULD CHEER... We’re very important… WE HAVE A SOCIAL PURPOSE”.The Sunday Times added:
"Washington has bolstered the US economy and banks to the tune of $12 TRILLION..."Just a banker doing God's work"? And you're going to vote for the same old crew next time around, ladies and gentlemen? You're going to vote for those who will leave such Godly bankers untouched and sniggering?
Does Blankfein not acknowledge that IT IS MADDENING FOR MOST OF US TO WATCH GOLDMAN GOBBLE UP SO MUCH CASH WHILE WE STRUGGLE? Quite the opposite. He insists WE SHOULD BE CELEBRATING HIS BANK’S SUCCESS, NOT CONDEMNING IT.
‘EVERYBODY SHOULD BE, FRANKLY, HAPPY,’ he says... Blankfein goes on to say something equally audacious. WE SHOULD WELCOME THE RETURN OF TITANIC PAYDAYS AT GOLDMAN…
Okay, forget bail-outs, forget bonuses, forget all the money stuff, if you can. Surely Blankfein cannot dodge the playwright David Hare?… Hare argues that IT IS ‘BLACKMAIL’ TO SAY THAT THERE CANNOT BE A RECOVERY UNLESS WE LET BANKERS GET ON WITH WHAT THEY HAVE ALWAYS DONE AND PAY THEMSELVES SQUILLIONS…
Blankfein has no time for such soft talk… ‘I’ve got news for you,’ he shoots back, eyes narrowing. 'IF THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM GOES DOWN, OUR BUSINESS IS GOING DOWN AND, TRUST ME, YOURS AND EVERYONE ELSE’S IS GOING DOWN, TOO’…
Talking to him is like talking to A MAN WHO HAS GREENBACKS, NOT BLOOD, RUNNING THROUGH HIS VEINS...
CALL HIM A FAT CAT WHO MOCKS THE PUBLIC. CALL HIM WICKED. Call him what you will. He is, he says, JUST A BANKER ‘DOING GOD’S WORK'."
Are you really going to leave the insanely greedy few to carry on hogging at the trough at the expense of the decent many forever and ever Amen? Are you really going to vote for the corrupt and sleazy, old guard politicians who kow-tow to the Goldman alumni and allow them to assume great offices of state after they're all done milking the system?
You're really going to vote for this $68-million-dollar employee of the Lord?
That is what you'll be doing, you do know that don't you? Because it's the Lloyd Blankfeins who really grind the organ. The Blairs, the Bushes and the Browns are just the trained-up monkeys.
On 23 November 2009, The Jewish Chronicle cited the objections of Sir Oliver Miles, former British ambassador to Libya, to the appointment of two Jews to the five-member Iraq inquiry headed by Lord Chilcot.
Sir Oliver said:
“BOTH GILBERT AND FREEDMAN ARE JEWISH AND GILBERT AT LEAST HAS A RECORD OF ACTIVE SUPPORT FOR ZIONISM. SUCH FACTS ARE NOT USUALLY MENTIONED IN THE MAINSTREAM BRITISH AND AMERICAN MEDIA.”The Jewish Chronicle added:
“Sir Oliver drew attention to the appointment of Holocaust historian and Winston Churchill biographer Sir Martin Gilbert, and the war historian and ‘BLAIR DOCTRINE’ ARCHITECT Sir Lawrence Freedman, who advocated HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION IN KOSOVO AND AFGHANISTAN. THE TWO MEN WILL BE MADE PRIVY COUNSELLORS in order to sit on the inquiry committee.”There is one Jew in the UK for every 150 non-Jews. This means that, as regards the composition of the Iraq Inquiry Committee, Jews are over-represented by a factor of 100 to 1.
The fact that both of these Jewish gentlemen would almost certainly be sympathetic to the governmental behaviours of New Labour would not be likely to increase the confidence the interested party might feel at their appointment.
On 28 November 2009, The Telegraph quoted Ashok Viswanathan, a founder of Operation Black Vote thus:
"RADIO 4 IS STILL TOO WHITE AND HAS A TWEENESS TO IT, but their response to the criticism has been positive… You look at the faces at the station and it doesn't look like twenty-first century Britain.”The Telegraph explained:
“BBC Radio 4 is reviewing its programming in an attempt to increase its appeal TO ETHNIC MINORITIES following criticism that IT IS 'TOO WHITE'…Ashok Viswanathan is Indian. Mark Damazer is Jewish.
Mark Damazer, the station's controller, is conscious that RADIO 4 IS REGARDED AS ‘TOO WHITE’ AND MET WITH RACE EQUALITY CAMPAIGNERS THIS MONTH TO DISCUSS MOVES TO MAKE THE STATION'S WORKFORCE MORE DIVERSE…. He has previously admitted that THERE IS A PROBLEM over the lack of black and Asian presenters".
This sentence stood out:
“FCO Ministers have decided that there should be no other contact with MEPs of any nationality who represent racist or extremist views.”Thus did David Miliband's Foreign Office happily disenfranchise almost a million English people who cast their vote for the BNP. You see, the letter was formulated immediately after Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons were elected to the EU Parliament on behalf of the British National Party. Up until this letter was sent, all British MEPs could normally expect to receive private briefings from FO officials. On 12 December 2009, the Foreign Office explained that the letter was meant to remind diplomats of the 'longstanding’ policy on those who represent racist views.'
Almost immediately upon arrival in England in 1940, Miliband was moved to write the following in his diary:
"The Englishman is a rabid nationalist... They are perhaps the most nationalist people in the world... When you hear the English talk of this war YOU SOMETIMES WANT THEM TO LOSE IT TO SHOW THEM HOW THINGS REALLY ARE".Which does tend to make you think that old anti-Nationalist Adolphe wasn't exactly all that grateful to those who had just given him and his dad sanctuary, doesn't it?
On 28 February 2004, The Guardian reported thus:
"Driving around the capital with other labourers... Ralph acquired a sense of England and its underlying structures. 'We found out about MIDDLE-CLASS MEANNESS AND SNOBBERY'...I guess, David's dad was one of those up-the worker Jews who wanted to do the thinking for the labouring classes but wasn't all that keen on getting his hands dirty.
One boiling afternoon during his first summer in London, he went to Highgate cemetery, found Karl Marx's grave and, standing with his fist clenched, swore, 'My own private oath that I WOULD BE FAITHFUL TO THE WORKERS' CAUSE!'
Not that he intended to remain a worker himself: he found clearing bombsites 'an arduous business' and felt a distance from his fellow labourers...
HE WANTED TO BE AN INTELLECTUAL."
In 1941, Miliband applied to study politics at the London School of Economics. He was accepted and spent a cosy, cosseted war in Cambridge, (where the LSE had re-located) well out of the way of the bombs.
Whilst there, one presumes he spent his war figuring out how to "show" the mean, snobbish, rabid nationalists of ye olde England "how things really are".
Given that his sprogs got to be youthful (and very powerful) Cabinet Ministers in both the Blair and Brown governments, I think you can safely say he succeeded.
On 29 March 2010, The Jewish Chronicle quoted the New Labour MP, Martin Linton, as having said the following at a House of Commons meeting the previous week:
“THERE ARE LONG TENTACLES OF ISRAEL IN THIS COUNTRY WHO ARE FUNDING ELECTION CAMPAIGNS AND PUTTING MONEY INTO THE BRITISH POLITICAL SYSTEM FOR THEIR OWN ENDS.
You must consider over the next few weeks, when you make decisions about how you vote… YOU MUST MAKE THEM AWARE OF THE ATTEMPT BY ISRAELIS AND BY PRO-ISRAELIS TO INFLUENCE THE ELECTION.”
“Just as Lord Ashcroft owns most of the Conservative Party, RIGHT-WING JEWISH MILLIONAIRES OWN THE REST.”The Jewish Chronicle also told us this:
ANDREW DISMORE (a New Labour MP) HAS BEEN A CONSISTENT CHAMPION OF THE CONCERNS OF THE LOCAL JEWISH COMMUNITY.
But after a series of allegations about his EXPENSES, he faces a tough fight with the Tories’ Matthew Offord and MATTHEW HARRIS, SECRETARY OF LIB DEM FRIENDS OF ISRAEL.
One of the most intriguing battles will be for the Bury South seat of MIDDLE EAST MINISTER IVAN LEWIS, A FORMER CHAIR OF MANCHESTER JEWISH FEDERATION.In the 25 January 2010 edition of The Nation magazine, Henry Siegman, former head of the American Jewish Congress, said this:
Although Mr Lewis sits on a substantial majority, he faces a formidable opponent in MICHELLE WISEMAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF MANCHESTER JEWISH CARE.”
“Israel has crossed the threshold from ‘the only democracy in the Middle East’ to the only apartheid regime in the Western world.”
On 12 April 2010, The Times quoted Monsignor Giacomo Babini, the Bishop Emeritus of Grossetto, thus:"Jews do not want the Church, they are its natural enemies... Deep down, historically speaking, the Jews are deicides.”
'Deicides' are God killers. After Bishop Babini denied that he had made any anti-Semitic remarks, Bruno Volpe, who interviewed him for the leading Roman Catholic website, Pontifex, insisted that the bishop had made the statement and threatened to release the audio tape of the interview as proof.
On 12 April 2010, Melanie Philips opined thus in The Daily Mail:“In an unprecedented move, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey, and other Church leaders are calling upon the Master of the Rolls and other senior judges TO STAND DOWN FROM FUTURE COURT OF APPEAL HEARINGS INVOLVING CASES OF RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF THE JUDGES' PERCEIVED BIAS AGAINST CHRISTIANITY.Lords Neuberger and Philips are Jewish. As, for that matter, is Melanie Philips.
The churchmen believe that BECAUSE OF THESE JUDGES' PAST RULINGS, THERE IS NO CHANCE OF A 'FAIR' JUDGMENT if they hear the latest such case, which has been scheduled for Thursday.
This involves Gary McFarlane, formerly a Christian relationship counsellor for Relate. He is appealing against an employment tribunal ruling that upheld his sacking for refusing to give sex therapy to homosexual couples. According to newspaper reports, Lord Carey has prepared a witness statement in support of Mr McFarlane in which he will apparently accuse the Court of Appeal of making A SERIES OF 'DISTURBING' JUDGMENTS AND BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR SOME 'DANGEROUS' REASONING WHICH COULD LEAD TO CHRISTIANS BEING BANNED FROM THE WORKPLACE.
In the light of recent events, such fears are scarcely exaggerated. For CHRISTIANITY IS UNDER RELENTLESS ATTACK FROM SECULAR BRITISH INSTITUTIONS, AS A RESULT OF WHICH THE FREEDOM OF CHRISTIANS TO PRACTISE THEIR RELIGION IS BEING LOST. A steady stream of Christians have found themselves out of a job on account of their religious beliefs. When nurse Shirley Chaplin refused to remove her cross, for example, she was prevented by the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust from working with patients.
And when Duke Amachree, a Christian homelessness officer with Wandsworth council, advised a client to put her faith in God, he was promptly suspended, marched off the premises and then sacked. In a string of other cases, CHRISTIANS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED FROM SERVING ON ADOPTION PANELS OR AS MARRIAGE REGISTRARS BECAUSE THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS MEAN THEY CANNOT SANCTION CIVIL PARTNERSHIPS OR GAY ADOPTION.
Such employment difficulties reflect a wider institutional animus against Christianity. TEACHERS BEND OVER BACKWARDS TO PROMOTE OTHER RELIGIONS AT ITS EXPENSE. THE BBC AND THE ARTISTIC WORLD MISS NO OPPORTUNITY TO TRASH IT OR HOLD IT UP TO RIDICULE, WHILE THE POLITICAL CLASS AND INTELLIGENTSIA TAKE AN AXE TO ITS MORAL PRECEPTS on issues such as euthanasia, sex outside marriage and abortion…
The last of several final straws for these clerics was the case of Lilian Ladele, a registrar who was sacked by Islington council after she refused to conduct civil partnership ceremonies because they were against her Christian beliefs. LED BY THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS, LORD NEUBERGER - the second most important judge in England - the Appeal Court ruled that it was unlawful for her to refuse to do so… These judges had discretion to rule in Ms Ladele's favour because the law upholds not one principle relevant to this case, but two - and they compete with each other. For enshrined in the European Convention on human Rights is the right to exercise religious conscience.
Why, then, did the judges in this case set aside the human Rights Convention, WHICH THEY NORMALLY REVERE AS HOLY WRIT? Because, said Lord Neuberger, it only protected those human beliefs which were 'WORTHY OF RESPECT IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY AND ARE NOT INCOMPATIBLE WITH HUMAN DIGNITY'.
So what the Master of the Rolls effectively seemed to be saying was that CHRISTIAN BELIEFS ARE UNWORTHY OF RESPECT IN A DEMOCRACY, AND INCOMPATIBLE WITH HUMAN DIGNITY…
Indeed, SUCH A RULING COMES VERY CLOSE INDEED TO CRIMINALISING CHRISTIANITY. For if putting Christian belief into practice is outlawed, it won't be long before Christian believers find themselves outlawed…
Under the guise of promoting ' tolerance' and 'liberal' social attitudes, anti-discrimination law is deeply intolerant and illiberal. That's because IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FAIRNESS AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH IDEOLOGY. IT IS INNATELY ON THE SIDE OF MINORITIES on the basis that they are by definition vulnerable to the majority. So IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDICIARY, IT HAS TURNED INTO A FEARSOME WEAPON AGAINST BRITAIN'S MAINSTREAM ATTITUDES AND FAITH.
The result is that CHRISTIANITY IS NOW IN DANGER OF BEING TURNED INTO A DESPISED AND MARGINALISED CREED practised only by consenting adults in private. CHRISTIANS ARE ALREADY BEING FORCED INTO RENOUNCING THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS IF THEY WANT TO REMAIN IN CERTAIN JOBS. This is simply intolerable in a liberal society where freedom of religious conscience is a bedrock value.
Yet while Christians find themselves under the legal cosh, A DOUBLE STANDARD IS EMPLOYED TOWARDS CERTAIN MINORITY FAITHS. Thus A CHRISTIAN NURSE IS TOLD SHE CAN'T WORK WITH PATIENTS UNLESS SHE REMOVES HER CROSS WHILE MUSLIM NHS STAFF HAVE BEEN EXEMPTED FROM HYGIENE RULES STIPULATING THAT THEIR FOREARMS MUST REMAIN UNCOVERED.
The relentless message from the top of our society is that CHRISTIANITY - THE FOUNDATION-STONE OF WESTERN LIBERTY, TOLERANCE AND DEMOCRACY - IS INTOLERANT, BIGOTED AND OBJECTIONABLE IN CONTRAST TO OTHER FAITHS…
On this great issue - the defence of his religion and the values of this society… Dr Rowan Williams, is conspicuously silent. Indeed, more than that HE IS POSITIVELY EMBRACING HIS FAITH'S DESTRUCTION. For ALONG WITH LORD PHILLIPS, THE FORMER SENIOR LAW LORD, DR WILLIAMS HAS WELCOMED THE ADVANCE IN BRITAIN OF ISLAMIC SHARIA LAW - WHICH REALLY IS INIMICAL TO DEMOCRACY AND EQUALITY.”
On 15 April 2010, the Totally Jewish web site reported a speech made by David Cameron to members of the Movement for Reform Judaism.
This is what Cameron said:
“Urgent, selfless moral compulsion TO CHANGE THE WORLD for the better is right at the heart of the Jewish way of life. If I become Prime Minister, I want to see that idea of responsibility extend right across our society. A key part of that will be about building a stronger, more COHESIVE society - and that means doing much more to tackle the rise in anti-Semitism."Cohesive, eh Dave? 'Cohesion' being a long-standing Blairite buzz-word. Thing is, you remember the blokes who blew up 52 Londoners on 7/7/2005? Why on earth would anyone want to 'cohere' with the likes of them? Why would we want to hang out in your 'stronger, more cohesive society' when to do so might mean cuddling up to the likes of the 11,546 immigrants in our prison system?
“I was appalled when the Community Security Trust told me that there were more anti-Semitic incidents in the first half of 2009 than in the whole of any previous year.”Ah, the Community Security Trust, an organisation run by the Jewish jailbird and Guinness scandal fraudster, Gerald Ronson. Yes, I can see how our Dave might rate the likes of him. Check out the Community Security Trust.
“WE NEED BIG CHANGES to root out this extremism - stopping preachers of hate from entering this country, BANNING THOSE EXTREMIST GROUPS WHO ARE ALREADY HERE."I’m all for 'stopping preachers of hate from entering this country,' Dave, but as for banning 'extremists,' well, that would depend on your definition of 'extremist,' I guess.
For example, would an 'extremist' be someone who dared to point out Jewish misdemeanour on a regular basis? Because there’s lots of it about, you see. I mean, we’ve all heard of the Neoconservatives who forced the Iraq War upon the world. Not so many, however, realise that most of the leading Neocons are Jewish. Would I be 'banned' from telling such a truth if you were the boss?
What about the Russian Oligrachs who robbed the ordinary people blind during Russia’s particularly nasty variation on the privatisation scam? Would I be banned from telling the world that most of them are Jewish? Would I be able to tell the British people that a good few of them have been buying up the choicest bits of Britain with their ill-gotten gains and folks like your shadow Chancellor, George Osborne, and New Labour's Lord Peter Mandelson have been hanging out with them?
What about sub-prime, the credit crunch and the world-wide recession that we, who had nothing to do with its creation, are now having to pay for? In a society run by you, would I not be allowed to point out the leading role that those who have this 'urgent, selfless moral compulsion to change the world for the better' played in it all?
“I am a great admirer of the Jewish people and your extraordinary achievements. I've long seen your community as A SHINING LIGHT IN OUR SOCIETY."We know, Dave. We really do. Most Tory parliamentarians think the same. 80 per cent of them are members of the Conservative Friends of Israel group. Which just happens to be the most influential and most substantially funded lobbying organisation in Westminster.
In his 1985 book A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives Today, Professor, Charles Silberman tells us this:“Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief… that JEWS ARE SAFE ONLY IN A SOCIETY ACCEPTANT OF A WIDE RANGE OF ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOURS, AS WELL AS A DIVERSITY OF RELIGIOUS AND ETHNIC GROUPS. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social issues’.”
Professor Kevin MacDonald comments thus upon the above quote:“He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of THEIR REAL GOAL OF DILUTING A SOCIETY'S HOMOGENEITY SO THAT JEWS WILL FEEL SAFE… Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, JEWS MAY SUPPORT DEVIANT MOVEMENTS, NOT BECAUSE THEY THINK IT IS GOOD FOR THE COUNTRY BUT BECAUSE IT IS GOOD FOR THE JEWS.”There you go, Dave! Two more 'extremists' who aren't too keen on your favourite world-changers. Both of them utterly deserving of a Cameronian ban, don't you think? Oh, I beg your pardon, Professor Silberman is Jewish, isn’t he? Guess you’ll have to make do with our Kev.
David Cameron's great-great-grandfather was a Jewish immigrant who made a fortune in banking.
On 30 April 2010, the comedian, Frankie Boyle, was quoted thus by The Guardian:"The show's producers will have thought that ISRAEL, AN AGGRESSIVE, TERRORIST STATE WITH A NUCLEAR ARSENAL, was an appropriate target for satire. The Trust's ruling… says that if you imagine that A STATE BUSILY GOING ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION OF AN ENTIRE PEOPLE is fair game, you are mistaken. ISRAEL IS OUT OF BOUNDS.Frankie had previously cracked the following joke on the Radio 4 programme, Political Animal:
It's tragic for such a great institution but IT IS NOW CRAVENLY AFRAID OF GIVING OFFENCE AND VULNERABLE TO ANY KIND OF WELL-DRILLED LOBBYING. I told the jokes on a Radio 4 show called Political Animal. That title seems to promise provocative comedy with a point of view. In practice the BBC wish to deliver the flavour of political comedy WITH NONE OF THE CONTENT."
"I've been studying Israeli army martial arts. I now know 16 ways to kick a Palestinian woman in the back. People think that the Middle East is very complex but I have an analogy that sums it up quite well. If you imagine that Palestine is a big cake, well, THAT CAKE IS BEING PUNCHED TO PIECES BY A VERY ANGRY JEW"!Following a complaint from JUST ONE LISTENER, who said the comments were 'DISGUSTING' and 'ANTISEMITIC,' the BBC Trust's editorial standards committee investigated and apologised. The committee said it endorsed the editorial complaints unit's finding about the use of the word "JEW", adding:
"The committee wished to apologise to the complainant on behalf of the BBC for any offence the remark may have caused him and other listeners to the programme."Just one thing, Frankie: it's not so much Israel that is "out of bounds". It's the Jew. We all have to pretend the one isn't the same as the other. That's democracy (the censorious kind that suits our Hebrew chums) for you.
After Gordon Brown's 'bigoted woman' remark, Jack Straw, was asked to justify it by one of his Blackburn constituents. On 3 May 2010, The Telegraph quoted his reply:
'He’s apologised for that,' said Straw, adding:
"I UNDERSTAND WHY SOME PEOPLE IN THE WHITE COMMUNITY WOULD SEE THIS TOWN CHANGING AND BE DISTURBED ABOUT IT.”Thus spake one of New Labour’s top 'town-changing' totalitarians.
Jack Straw describes himself as 'third-generation' Jewish.
In Hannah Rothschild's diary of the time, she quotes Peter Mandelson as having said this on 6 May 2010:“Win or lose, I could just stay and keep handing out money like a Bourbon king."Rothschild adds:
"Everyone laughs but he cries as he sinks a knife into a large fruitcake."Fruitcake. How appropriate.
Rothschild sits on the National Gallery's board of trustees. She was appointed by Prime Minister Gordon Brown in 2009. Her father, investment banker, Jacob, was chairman of trustees of the Gallery from 1985 to 1991. Brown appointed chartered accountant, Gautam Dalal, at the same time as the meg-rich society journalist.Rothschild's brother, Nat, partied with Mandelson and Chancellor George Osborne on the yacht of Russian-Jewish Oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, and holidayed with Mandelson at Deripaska's Russian mansion.
Mandelson's Oligarch pal linked to assassination
On 28 May 2010, Rabbi Sid Schwartz, the founder of Panim, the Institute for Jewish Leadership and Values, said this at The Reporter Group web site:
“In the past decade, I note that FEWER AND FEWER IDENTIFY AS ZIONISTS. Israel plays a much less significant role in their identity formation… and AN ASTOUNDING NUMBER HOLD THE ORGANIZED JEWISH COMMUNITY IN CONTEMPT. I believe THE WAY OUR COMMUNITY HAS CHOSEN TO ‘DEFEND ISRAEL’ HAS PROFOUNDLY ALIENATED THE NEXT GENERATION OF AMERICAN JEWS.”On 6 June 2010, David Miliband said this on The Andrew Marr Show:
“I think that a cap on skilled migrants from outside the European Union... IT'S WORTHLESS because it will catch people who this country needs.”
On 9 July 2010, Miliband gave the Keir Hardie lecture in Mountain Ash, Wales.In this he admitted that:
"WE LOST THE TRUST OF THE PEOPLE".He added:
"I supported and voted for him. (Gordon Brown) I agreed that WE NEEDED GREATER MORAL SERIOUSNESS AND LESS INDIFFERENCE TO THE EXCESSES OF A CELEBRITY-DRENCHED CULTURE… I agreed with him on the importance of party reform and A MEANINGFUL INTERNATIONALISM… I agreed that we needed a civic morality to champion civility when confronting a widespread indifference to others.Tony Blair gave the boy Miliband the office to write New Labour’s 1997 manifesto so, even before he became an MP, he was up there hobnobbing with the elite, creating policy and driving it forward.
BUT IT DIDN'T HAPPEN. It was not just more of the same. FAR FROM CORRECTING THEM, FAILINGS – TACTICS, SPIN, HIGH-HANDEDNESS – INTENSIFIED… THE ROOTS OF THAT FAILURE WERE DEEP, NOT RECENT…
LACK OF DEMOCRATIC DISCUSSION, the hollowing out of the party… WE WERE SEEN AS A FEARSOME BUT NOT ATTRACTIVE POLITICAL MACHINE AND THE UGLINESS OF THAT KIND OF POLITICS. We did not come to represent a new dawn but another government whose time had passed.
We seemed to sever welfare from desert and this led people to think that THEIR TAXES WERE BEING WASTED, THAT THEY WERE BEING USED. WHEN WE SAID FAIRNESS, PEOPLE THOUGHT IT WAS ANYTHING BUT…
MANY OF THE 'HARDWORKING FAMILIES' WE WISHED TO APPEAL TO DID NOT VIEW US AS THEIR PARTY… People felt like consumers and not partners. WE TALKED ABOUT 'WE' BUT IT MEANT US, NOT THEM, SO THE WORKFORCE OFTEN FELT NEGLECTED AND CITIZENS THE SAME”.
His latter day confession tells us that he knew all along how despised he and his ilk were and why. When it mattered he did nothing but promote and defend the indefensible. Now he’s after the top job he tries to convince the drugged-up, the dumbed-down, the brainwashed and the dead that it was nothing to do with him. It has everything to do with him! He’s IT! He was there when the horror was being compiled. He didn’t just nod the following through, he will have argued the case for much, perhaps all, of it:
Lack of 'moral seriousness;' 'the excesses of a celebrity-drenched culture' 'meaningful internationalism;' (rule by the global elite) 'widespread indifference to others;' 'spin;' 'high-handedness;' 'deep-rooted failure;' 'lack of democratic discussion;' 'fearsome;' 'not attractive;' 'ugly politics;' 'taxes wasted,' 'anything but fairness;' 'neglected citizens and workforce' and 'US NOT THEM'!
Oh yes, Mr Miliband, you’re IT alright.
On 3 September 2010, the EU trade commissioner and former Belgian Foreign Minister , Karel de Gucht, suggested that the latest Middle East peace talks were doomed because of the power of the Jewish lobby in Washington.
He said this in a Belgian radio interview:
“Don't underestimate the opinion… of the average Jew outside Israel. There is indeed a belief, it's difficult to describe it otherwise, among most Jews that THEY ARE RIGHT. And a belief is something that's difficult to counter with rational arguments. And it's not so much whether these are religious Jews or not. Lay Jews also share the same belief that THEY ARE RIGHT. So IT IS NOT EASY TO HAVE, EVEN WITH MODERATE JEWS, A RATIONAL DISCUSSION ABOUT WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING IN THE MIDDLE EAST…In response to the above, Moshe Kantor, the head of the European Jewish Congress, said this:
Do not underestimate the Jewish lobby on Capitol Hill. That is the best organised lobby in the States, YOU SHOULDN'T UNDERESTIMATE THE GRIP IT HAS ON AMERICAN POLITICS, NO MATTER WHETHER IT'S REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS."
"This is part of a dangerous trend of INCITEMENT AGAINST JEWS and Israel in Europe THAT NEEDS TO BE STAMPED OUT IMMEDIATELY. What sort of environment allows such remarks to be made openly by a senior politician? Once again we hear OUTRAGEOUS ANTISEMITISM from a senior European official. THE LIBEL OF JEWISH POWER IS APPARENTLY ACCEPTABLE AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE EU."Libel, Moshe?
You’re actually trying to tell us that 'Jewish power' is a myth? Well, if it’s a myth I guess your ‘stamp it out’ outburst will have no effect whatsoever upon Mr de Gucht. De Gucht was soon apologising profusely for telling how it is. To whit:
“I did not mean in any possible way to cause offense or stigmatize the Jewish Community… Anti-Semitism has no place in today's world."On 6 June 2010, Simon Walters, The Mail on Sunday's Political Editor, said this:
“DAVID MILIBAND'S LABOUR LEADERSHIP CAMPAIGN IS BEING BANKROLLED TO THE TUNE OF £50,000 BY LABOUR TYCOON LORD SAINSBURY – while designer Ozwald Boateng has provided him with cut-price suits to improve his wooden image.Lord Sainsbury’s support for the former Foreign Secretary’s bid to succeed Gordon Brown is the latest evidence of Mr Miliband’s Blairite links. LORD SAINSBURY, WHO GAVE £10 MILLION TO LABOUR AND WAS MADE A TRADE MINISTER BY TONY BLAIR, IS PAYING FOR MR MILIBAND’S CAMPAIGN HQ in Smith Square, Westminster, which is next door to Margaret Thatcher’s old Tory head office.Miliband is Jewish. So is Sainsbury. Boateng is black. Tony Blair is a tw*t. And, in my humble opinion, the greatest traitor our islands have ever produced.
Lord Sainsbury is one of Britain’s richest men and his family’s fortune is estimated at £2.1 billion. He has 11 homes around the world.
Although Mr Blair has refused to say publicly who he is backing, most Labour MPs believe that he wants Mr Miliband, who ran the former Prime Minister’s No 10 policy unit, to win. In a further gesture of support, Mr BLAIR HAS ALLOWED JO GIBBONS, A SENIOR AIDE AT HIS BLAIR FOUNDATION, TO TAKE TIME OFF TO HELP RUN MR MILIBAND’S CAMPAIGN.”
On 8 June 2010, The Daily Mail quoted the $65billion dollar fraudster, Bernie Madoff, as having said this to his fellow jailbirds:"FU*K MY VICTIMS, I carried them for 20 years."The Mail added:
"A profile on the conman, who was sentenced to 150 years behind bars for orchestrating THE WORLD'S BIGGEST INVESTMENT SCAM, has revealed HE HAS NO SYMPATHY FOR THE THOUSANDS OF 'GREEDY' VICTIMS WHOSE LIFE SAVINGS HE DECIMATED. Inmates told the New York Magazine how THE 71-YEAR-OLD APPEARED PROUD OF HIS CRIMES.”At keast two of those Madoff defrauded are known to have committed suicide.
He is Jewish.
On 8 June 2010, after describing Tony Blair as the 'special envoy of the Quartet of Middle East peace mediators,' the Israeli newspaper, Ha'aretz, quoted him thus:
"I'M 100 PERCENT ON ISRAEL'S SIDE. ISRAEL HAS THE RIGHT TO INSPECT WHAT GOES INTO GAZA."Thus spake the wholly 'impartial' 'special envoy'. 'There are rockets fired from Gaza and that there are people in Gaza who want to kill innocent Israelis,' continued the special one.
Hey, Tony, are there any Israelis in Israel (and Jews in the wider world) who want to kill innocent Palestinians? How many of the recently killed and wounded peace activists would have been 'innocent,' do you think? For that matter, how many of the 1300 Gazans killed in the 2009 invasion would have been 'guilty?'
I wonder also, might there be any Israelis in Israel who'd like to kill innocent Iraqis, Lebanese and Iranians? If there were, would this incline you to be '100 per cent' on the 'side' of the Palestinians, Iraqis, Lebanese and Iranians? How about suggesting that the Palestinians, Iraqis, Lebanese and Iranians should 'have the right' to "inspect" whatever 'goes into' Israel?
That'd be fair, wouldn't it? It's all gone quiet over there, Tony.
But wait! Tony B adds:
"Iran with nuclear weapons is not something we should contemplate or allow"!How about an Israel 'with nuclear weapons,' Tony? Would that be something 'we should allow?'
It's all gone quiet over there again.
Should the world ever afford itself the 'right' to 'inspect' Israel, I suggest that, when the inspection's over, it checks out Tony B's back yard, shed, garage and cellar as well.
On 11 June 2010, after the child of Orthodox Jews was refused a place at the King David Jewish school in favour of a non-Jew, Dawn Chapple, the child’s mother, was quoted thus by The Jewish Chronicle:"That guy married a non-Jewish woman who converted Reform. But I'M 100 PER CENT AN ORTHODOX JEW. He's won a place for his son, that my daughter can't have. I THINK IT'S DISGUSTING THAT NON-JEWISH CHILDREN HAVE MORE RIGHTS ON OUR OWN SCHOOL MORE THAN A JEWISH CHILD."'Disgusting' that non-Jews have 'more rights' than Jews, Dawn? Sounds like racism to me.
Lord Lester, who has been at the heart of the putsch to impose the race laws upon the British people, ever since the first such law was introduced, is Jewish. As are/were so many within a PC movement that has relentlessly promoted the immigrant (whilst denigrating the native British) in recent times.
The word 'racist' first appeared in a 1932 translation of Trotsky’s, 'The History of the Russian Revolution.'
The Russian Revolutionary leader, Leon Trotsky (born Leon Bronstein) was also Jewish.
The word 'racism' was popularised throughout the English speaking world by the 1938 translation of a 1934 work by the German 'sex-expert,' Magnus Hirschfeld. The British publisher, Victor Gollancz, the Hungarian immigrant who published Hirschfeld‘s book, was Jewish too.
As was Magnus Hirschfeld.
Political correctness began life in 1923 as Cultural Marxism. The alumnae and disciples of the 'Frankfurt School' were responsible for its creation and world-wide promotion.
Most of the original Cultural Marxists were also Jewish. Check out the essay, Who Stole Our Culture.
What goes around comes around, Dawn.
On 11 June 2010, The Daily Express quoted David Miliband, who will probably be New Labour's next leader, thus:
"BRITAIN IS BETTER BECAUSE OF IMMIGRATION."Miliband's parents were both Jewish immigrants.
On 22 June 2010, the editorial of Haaretz, the oldest and, according to Wikipedia, the 'most influential' Israeli daily newspaper, featured the article, 'The silent expulsion'.
This is what was said:
“Citizens of Israel can leave the country for any length of time, and their citizenship and all their rights are theirs in perpetuity. But when it comes to Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem, ISRAEL APPLIES DRACONIAN REGULATIONS WHOSE COVERT INTENT IS TO BRING ABOUT THE EXPULSION OF AS MANY PALESTINIANS AS POSSIBLE FROM THEIR HOME CITY...Er, is the Pope Catholic? Yes, sir. As long as the Israeli Jew continues to vote for the Netanyahu/Sharon/Shamir/Begin type, the indigenous non-Jew will continue to be treated as a foreigner in his own homeland.
At a time when the prime minister speaks grandiloquently of the reunification of Jerusalem, ISRAEL PRACTICES INEQUALITY AND DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE CITY'S ARAB RESIDENTS... THE SCREWS HAVE BEEN TIGHTENED IN RECENT YEARS: In 2008 the residents' rights of 4,557 Palestinian inhabitants of the city were abrogated...
WILL ISRAEL CONTINUE TREATING THE PALESTINIAN INHABITANTS OF ITS CAPITAL AS IF THEY WERE FOREIGN MIGRANTS”?
Shmuel Rosner, Haaretz's former U.S. correspondent, once said this:
"People who read it are better educated and more sophisticated than most but the rest of the country doesn't know it exists."It's the 'covert intent' of the self-serving, self-approving, less 'educated/sophisticated... rest of the country,' along with the 'Netanyahu/Sharon/Shamir/Begin' types guiding them, that the Palestinians and the wider world are concerned about, Schmuel.
If those who understand and sympathise with Haaretz editorials like the one posted above were running the world, I guess the 'bigoted,' 'Fascist,' 'racist,' 'anti-Semitic,' 'neo-Nazi' whistleblowing folk would be out of a job.
Speed the day!
At the UK’s 2010 Methodist Conference, the paper 'Justice for Israel and Palestine' was debated.
Here are a few of the things that were said in this paper:
"The conflict in Israel/Palestine IS CENTRAL TO CURRENT PATTERNS OF INSECURITY IN THE WORLD... THE KEY HINDRANCE TO SECURITY AND A LASTING PEACE FOR ALL IN THE REGION IS THE OCCUPATION OF PALESTINIAN TERRITORY BY THE STATE OF ISRAEL, NOW IN ITS FIFTH DECADE...The above was signed by 30 organisations and individuals.
Israel militarily occupied the West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip1 and the Syrian Golan Heights in 1967. After 43 years, it remains the occupying power and thus responsible under international law for the welfare of the Palestinian inhabitants of these territories. THE OCCUPATION, HOWEVER, CAUSES GREAT SUFFERING TO PALESTINIANS as well as Israelis...
It is important for Methodists to… differentiate the Israel they read about in their Bibles FROM THE MODERN STATE OF ISRAEL THEY SEE IN MODERN NEWS FOOTAGE...
British Methodists would do well to listen TO THE PERSPECTIVES OF PALESTINIAN CHRISTIAN THEOLOGIANS in how they respond to questions of NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY AND HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION, THE RIGHTS OF MINORITIES AND THE PLACE OF INDIVIDUALS IN A WIDER COMMUNITY.”
On 16 July 2010, the Israeli jazz musician, Gilead Atzmon, said this on his own blog:“A survey that was published a few days ago suggests that... AT LEAST 77% OF BRITISH JEWS BELIEVE THAT MILLIONS OF DISPOSSESSED PALESTINIANS SHOULD CONTINUE TO DWELL IN REFUGEE CAMPS AND NEVER BE ALLOWED TO THEIR HOMES, CITIES, AND VILLAGES. I am actually far from impressed with British Jewry’s inclination towards peace.
I wonder what drives 77% of British Jews? Why don’t they really welcome Palestinian people to return to their land and enjoy exactly the same civil rights British Jews celebrate in the UK?…
At the time we were devastated to find out that 94% OF THE ISRAELIS SUPPORTED THE IDF'S MURDEROUS TACTICS AT THE TIME OF OPERATION CAST LEAD… The lack of ethics in British Jewry is far more concerning. Eighteen months after the massacre in Gaza and a year after the UN Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict found Israel guilty of numerous war crimes and crimes against humanity, nearly three quarters (72%) OF BRITISH JEWS AGREED THAT ISRAEL'S ACTION IN GAZA IN 2008 AND 2009 WAS ‘A LEGITIMATE ACT OF SELF-DEFENCE’. I believe that in practice this means that 7 OUT OF 10 BRITISH JEWS SUPPORT ISRAELI WAR CRIMES…
The study, which was carried out by the Institute for Jewish Policy Research, found that Jews in Britain strongly identify with Israel, with nine out of 10 having visited the country…
The notion that IN BRITAIN THERE IS A MINORITY COMMUNITY, THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF WHOM, SUPPORT WAR CRIMES is pretty shocking, especially considering the devastating fact that EVERY POLITICAL PARTY IN THIS COUNTRY IS BANKROLLED BY DIFFERENT SHADES OF THE ‘FRIENDS OF ISRAEL.’
In comparison I wonder how the British public would react if they find out that 72% of the Muslim community supported the killings in Mumbai, 7/7 or 9/11.”
On 21 July 2010, Lord Carlile of Berriew, a former Lib Dem MP who, from 2005 onwards, has acted as an independent reviewer of anti-terror laws, was quoted this by The Independent:“IT'S CERTAINLY THE CASE THAT THE THREAT AND NUMBER OF HOME-GROWN TERRORISTS… INCREASED AFTER THE IRAQ WAR. This makes life difficult both for the old government, who have criticisms to answer, and for the current Government. It makes their review of current terrorism law a delicate exercise because THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN THE THREAT."
On 26 July 2010, Israeli President, Shimon Peres, said this in an interview with Benny Morris for Tablet Magazine:"OUR NEXT BIG PROBLEM IS ENGLAND.... In England there has always been something deeply pro-Arab… and anti-Israeli in the establishment.Peres feels able to say this on the back of the fact that Tony Blair and Gordon Brown were the most pro-Judaic Prime Ministers in British history.
They abstained in the 1947 U.N. Partition Resolution, despite the Balfour Declaration. They maintained an arms embargo against us; they had a defense treaty with Jordan. They always worked against us...
THERE IS ALSO ANTI-SEMITISM. THERE IS IN ENGLAND A SAYING THAT AN ANTI-SEMITE IS SOMEONE WHO HATES THE JEWS MORE THAN IS NECESSARY."
David Cameron, whose great-great-grandfather was Jewish, has, since he became Tory leader made numerous pro-Isaeli comments and both the front-runners for the leadership of New Labour, David and Ed Miliband, are Jewish.
It would seem that, if you aren't 100 per cent FOR the Jews, they perceive you as being AGAINST them. An anti-Semite. Which bogey phrase was concocted in the 1860s by an Austrian gentleman by the name of Moritz Steinschneider.
He was Jewish.
On 3 September 2010, the EU trade commissioner and former Belgian Foreign Minister, Karel de Gucht, suggested that the latest Middle East peace talks were doomed because of the power of the Jewish lobby in Washington.He said this in a Belgian radio interview:
“Don't underestimate the opinion… of the average Jew outside Israel. There is indeed a belief, it's difficult to describe it otherwise, among most Jews that THEY ARE RIGHT. And a belief is something that's difficult to counter with rational arguments. And it's not so much whether these are religious Jews or not. Lay Jews also share the same belief that THEY ARE RIGHT. So IT IS NOT EASY TO HAVE, EVEN WITH MODERATE JEWS, A RATIONAL DISCUSSION ABOUT WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING IN THE MIDDLE EAST…
Do not underestimate the Jewish lobby on Capitol Hill. That is the best organised lobby in the States, YOU SHOULDN'T UNDERESTIMATE THE GRIP IT HAS ON AMERICAN POLITICS, NO MATTER WHETHER IT'S REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS."
In response to the above, Moshe Kantor, the head of the European Jewish Congress, said this:"This is part of a dangerous trend of INCITEMENT AGAINST JEWS and Israel in Europe THAT NEEDS TO BE STAMPED OUT IMMEDIATELY. What sort of environment allows such remarks to be made openly by a senior politician? Once again we hear OUTRAGEOUS ANTISEMITISM from a senior European official. THE LIBEL OF JEWISH POWER IS APPARENTLY ACCEPTABLE AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE EU."
Libel, Moshe? You’re actually trying to tell us that 'Jewish power' is a myth? Well, if it’s a myth your ‘stamp it out’ outburst should have had no effect whatsoever upon Mr de Gucht. However, the politician who had spoken out courageously just a few days before was soon baring his behind before the usual suspects. To whit:
“I did not mean in any possible way to cause offense or stigmatize the Jewish Community… Anti-Semitism has no place in today's world."'The libel of Jewish power.' Truly, the truth will soon be a capital crime in the Empire of lies.
On 31 October 2010, David S. Broder said this in The Washington Post:
“Obama can still storm back to win a second term in 2012. He is that much better than the competition.David Broder, who will never go to war himself, is, of course, Jewish.
In what respects is he enduringly superior? Let's start with the basics. He is much smarter than his challengers in either party, better able to read the evidence and come to the right conclusions…
Can Obama harness the forces that might spur new growth? This is the key question for the next two years. What are those forces? Essentially, there are two. One is the power of the business cycle, the tidal force that throughout history has dictated when the economy expands and when it contracts.
What else might affect the economy? The answer is obvious, but its implications are frightening. War and peace influence the economy. Look back at FDR and the Great Depression. WHAT FINALLY RESOLVED THAT ECONOMIC CRISIS? WORLD WAR II.
Here is where Obama is likely to prevail. WITH STRONG REPUBLICAN SUPPORT IN CONGRESS FOR CHALLENGING IRAN'S AMBITION TO BECOME A NUCLEAR POWER, HE CAN SPEND MUCH OF 2011 AND 2012 ORCHESTRATING A SHOWDOWN WITH THE MULLAHS. THIS WILL HELP HIM POLITICALLY BECAUSE THE OPPOSITION PARTY WILL BE URGING HIM ON. AND AS TENSIONS RISE AND WE ACCELERATE PREPARATIONS FOR WAR, THE ECONOMY WILL IMPROVE…
The nation will rally around Obama because IRAN IS THE GREATEST THREAT TO THE WORLD IN THE YOUNG CENTURY. IF HE CAN CONFRONT THIS THREAT AND CONTAIN IRAN'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS, HE WILL HAVE MADE THE WORLD SAFER AND MAY BE REGARDED AS ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL PRESIDENTS IN HISTORY."
On 22 December 2010, Allison Good wrote the following at The Jerusalem Post:
“There’s this weird relationship between Jews and evangelical Christians in America… A similar parallel is emerging with Israel’s right and European radical populist movements such as France’s Front National, Britain’s National Front and UK Independence Party, the Netherlands’ Dutch Party for Freedom, and believe me, the list goes on and on… Radical populism has become mainstream.Interesting how Ms Good equates those who are 'white… pro-law and order and… emphasize a return to traditional family values' with 'extreme Romantics of the worst sort, xenophobes stuck in the rhetoric of the nineteenth century,' don’t you think?
These parties are nationalist, white, anti-immigration, anti-Muslim, pro-law and order and they emphasize a return to traditional family values. THEY ARE EXTREME ROMANTICS OF THE WORST SORT, XENOPHOBES STUCK IN THE RHETORIC OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY…
France’s president, Nicolas Sarkozy, recently deported a slew of Roma because their gypsy camps are illegal. Not that it does anything, since ROMA ARE EU CITIZENS AND CAN THEREFORE GO RIGHT BACK TO FRANCE…
Enter politician and legislative representative Geert Wilders, the leader of the Dutch Party for Freedom… Wilders’ policies apparently include ‘introducing Israeli-type ‘administrative detention’ or arrest without trial, banning the building of mosques and suspending immigration of non-Western foreigners to the Netherlands… and claims that Jerusalem is the ‘main front protecting the West’ from Islam’…
How can Israel’s right even stand to communicate with people like Wilders? Is he the lesser of two evils? We need to keep an eye on this budding relationship. Israel truly is a country of failed ideologies if its hardcore Zionists are collaborating with the would-be fascists in Europe.”
Worst sort? Xenophobes? Nineteenth century? The Jerusalem Post thinks it’s OK for the likes of Alison Good to sneer at those who stick up for family values and law and order?
Oh yes. If they happen to be of white, European origin.
That really IS how some Jews think.
On 3 January 2011, the Economic Collapse blog said this:
“Just who is George Soros? Well, he is a billionaire 'philanthropist' who came to be known as 'the Man Who Broke the Bank of England' when he raked in a staggering one billion dollars during the 1992 'Black Wednesday' currency crisis… George Soros and his pet organizations have played a key role in quite a few 'revolutions' around the globe over the last several decades, but these days the main goal of George Soros is to bring political change to the United States… WHAT HE WANTS IS A BIG BROTHER-STYLE ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT based on extreme European-style socialism, strict population control and the radical green agenda…The original BBC blurb advertising Louis Theroux’s 3 February 2011 BBC2 documentary, ‘The Ultra Zionists’ said this:
Much of what Soros is trying to accomplish lines up with the goals of the international banking elite… THE INTERNATIONAL BANKING ELITE VERY MUCH WANT A GLOBAL CURRENCY AND A 'NEW WORLD ORDER', BUT WHAT THEY DON'T NEED IS A 'SQUEAKY WHEEL' LIKE SOROS RUNNING AROUND DRAWING UNNEEDED ATTENTION TO THOSE GOALS…
THE SAME HANDFUL OF ELITIST ORGANIZATIONS HAS DOMINATED THE CABINETS OF EVERY SINGLE PRESIDENT THAT WE HAVE HAD SINCE WORLD WAR II. If you doubt this, just CHECK OUT HOW MANY MEMBERS OF EACH PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION OVER THE LAST 40 YEARS HAVE BELONGED TO EITHER THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION OR THE BILDERBERG GROUP…
Soros has been saying the the U.S. dollar needs to go down for quite a while now, and he speaks of the coming fall of the dollar as if it is inevitable… Soros even had the gall to say that having the dollar be the reserve currency of the world is not in our national interest and that a move to a global currency is 'a healthy, if painful, adjustment' that we are just going to have to endure for the greater good of the world economy.
But shouldn't the American people have something to say about all of this? Perhaps the American people do not want a 'managed decline' of the U.S. dollar. Perhaps the American people do not want any part of a new 'global currency'. Perhaps the American people do not want any part of a 'New World Order'.
But TO MEN LIKE GEORGE SOROS, IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER WHAT 'THE LITTLE PEOPLE' THINK. IN THE WORLD THAT SOROS LIVES IN, THOSE WITH OVERWHELMING AMOUNTS OF MONEY AND POWER KNOW WHAT IS BEST FOR THE REST OF US, AND IF 'THE LITTLE PEOPLE' DON'T SEEM TO WANT TO GO ALONG INITIALLY THEN PUBLIC OPINION CAN BE BOUGHT IF YOU JUST SPEND ENOUGH MONEY.
THE SAD TRUTH IS THAT WE ALREADY LIVE IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY. Just go into just about any store across the United States and start picking up products to see where they were made. Very few of the things we buy are still made in the United States.
Today, labor is a global commodity. American workers must now directly compete for jobs with those making slave labor wages in China and India. THE FACT THAT MILLIONS OF U.S. JOBS ARE BEING OFFSHORED AND OUTSOURCED DOES NOT BOTHER ADVOCATES OF GLOBALISM AT ALL… Most Americans have little to no idea just HOW MUCH INFLUENCE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS THE UNITED NATIONS, THE WORLD BANK, THE IMF AND THE WTO HAVE OVER OUR DAILY LIVES…
WE ALREADY LIVE IN A WORLD THAT HAS BEEN DEEPLY, DEEPLY INTEGRATED. AS THIS CONTINUES, AT SOME POINT IT WILL ONLY SEEM 'NATURAL' FOR AMERICA TO AGREE TO A TRUE GLOBAL CURRENCY AND FULL GLOBAL POLITICAL INTEGRATION...
Let us hope that the American people wake up enough to not just go passively into a 'New World Order'. A global economy is bad for America and a global government would be really bad for America.”
"In part these men and women are a tiny GROUP OF RELIGIOUS EXTREMISTS who claim they are acting on divine promises from thousands of years ago. In part THEY ARE POSSIBLY THE BIGGEST THREAT TO WORLD PEACE TODAY."When Jewish elements complained about the description, the BBC quickly apologised and amended it, saying:
"This billing for The Ultra Zionists did not reflect the programme accurately. As soon as the mistake was brought to our attention, we rectified the situation by replacing it with the correct billing."
Theroux responded thus:"The Zionists view Arabs and Palestinians as squatting in what is theirs. I was intrigued by that. I thought it was morally questionable…
Before I went, I thought that for an Israeli, pre-1967 borders should be enough. Given that SO MANY ARABS WERE DISPLACED IN 1948 AND WERE LIVING AS REFUGEES, TAKING MORE LAND SEEMED EXCESSIVE AND THE SETTLERS WERE CONTRIBUTING TO THE PROBLEM.
I wanted to show that the army was policing the Israeli extremists, and instead of just showing extremist views we could show that the ones reining them in were the Israeli military. But I think I overestimated that. THEY LET SETTLERS DO WHAT THEY WANT. I WAS SHOCKED AND DISAPPOINTED BY THAT. I DIDN'T REALISE TO WHAT EXTENT THE STATE ENCOURAGED SETTLERS."
On 20 February 2011, the author, Ian McEwan, said the following during his Jerusalem Prize acceptance speech:“A recent discovery for me has been S Yizhar's Khirbet Khizeh, published in 1949, the luminous account of THE CLEARING OF AN ARAB VILLAGE DURING THE '48 WAR, and of a protest that never quite leaves the throat of its narrator AS THE HOUSES ARE DEMOLISHED AND THE VILLAGERS DRIVEN FROM THEIR LAND… Khirbet Khizet remains painfully relevant, and the moral questioning lives on.
There are so many writers one could mention, but let me single out three senior figures who have earned the respect and love of readers around the world, Amoz Oz, Abrahim Yehoshua and David Grossman… In their long careers THEY HAVE OPPOSED THE SETTLEMENTS….
Hamas… has embraced the nihilism of the suicide bomber, of rockets fired blindly into towns, and embraced the nihilism of an extinctionist policy towards Israel. But (to take just one example) IT WAS ALSO NIHILISM THAT FIRED A ROCKET AT THE UNDEFENDED GAZAN HOME OF THE PALESTINIAN DOCTOR, IZZELDIN ABUELAISH, IN 2008, KILLING HIS THREE DAUGHTERS AND HIS NIECE. IT IS NIHILISM TO MAKE A LONG TERM PRISON CAMP OF THE GAZA STRIP. Nihilism has unleashed the tsunami of concrete across the occupied territories.
When the distinguished judges of this prize commend me for my 'love of people and concern for their right to self-realisation', they seem to be demanding that I mention, and I must oblige, THE CONTINUED EVICTIONS AND DEMOLITIONS, AND RELENTLESS PURCHASES OF PALESTINIAN HOMES IN EAST JERUSALEM, THE PROCESS OF RIGHT OF RETURN GRANTED TO JEWS BUT NOT ARABS.
These so-called 'facts on the ground' are a hardening concrete poured over the future, over future generations of Palestinian and Israeli children who will inherit the conflict and find it even more difficult to resolve than it is today…
A great and self-evident injustice hangs in the air, PEOPLE HAVE BEEN AND ARE BEING DISPLACED…
Where is Israel's political creativity? What do national politicians have?… Surely not the concrete mixer? Surely not the eviction order?… That was surely not the best Israeli politicians could do, when they succumbed to what David Grossman has called 'the temptation of strength', and casually brushed aside remarkable concessions from the Palestinian Authority?…
After her recent visit here, The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights notes that the firing of rockets into Israel from Gaza constitutes a war crime. She also notes that that THE ANNEXATION OF EAST JERUSALEM CONTRAVENES INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THAT EAST JERUSALEM IS STEADILY BEING DRAINED OF ITS PALESTINIAN INHABITANTS.”
On 11 March 2011, Communities Minister, Baroness Hanham, was quoted thus by The Jewish Chronicle:“The last place that we want antisemitism to take a hold is in our schools or universities… STAMP IT OUT at the very earliest stages… a range of guidance, providing a practical framework, is available to higher education institutions to help them to support tolerance…
What is on the internet goes beyond hate, and VERY SOON WE WILL HAVE TO FIND A WAY OF OBLITERATING AND BLOTTING OUT SUCH UNACCEPTABLE MATERIAL.”
On 14 April 2011, The Jewish Chronicle quoted James Harding, editor of The Times, thus:"I AM PRO-ISRAEL. I BELIEVE IN THE STATE OF ISRAEL. I would have had a real problem if I had been coming to a paper with a history of being anti-Israel. And, of course, RUPERT MURDOCH IS PRO-ISRAEL."The Jewish Chronicle added:
“Asked by an audience member for his views on BBC coverage, he said it was ‘not a pro-Israel newsroom and IT HAS TAKEN MANAGEMENT TO GET SOME BALANCE IN THERE’.”Harding is Jewish.
On 7 June 2011, Fiona Byrne, the Mayor of Marrickville, a suburb of Sydney in Australia, was presented with a letter of support from the Archbishop Desmond Tutu.
In this he wrote:
“I want to pay my respects to you and your fellow councillors in Marrickville FOR TAKING A STAND TO ISOLATE THE ISRAELI STATE. We in South Africa, who both suffered apartheid and defeated it, have the moral right and responsibility to name and shame INSTITUTIONALIZED SEPARATION, EXCLUSION AND DOMINATION BY ONE ETHNIC GROUP OVER OTHERS… I HAVE SEEN HOW THE PALESTINIANS ARE OPPRESSED, DISPOSSESSED AND EXILED.”
On 13 June 2011, Joshua Levi responded thus in The Australian Jewish News:
“Desmond Tutu may have helped South Africa bring about the end of apartheid, but his open support for Marrickville Council’s Boycott Divestment and Sanctions campaign against Israel has left the Jewish community cold...
When Marrickville Council voted to impose a boycott against Israel last year, LEADERS FROM THE LIBERAL, LABOR AND EVEN FEDERAL GREENS PARTIES CAME OUT IN OPPOSITION TO THE POLICY and called on it to focus on local issues. NSW PREMIER BARRY O’FARRELL EVEN THREATENED TO SACK THE COUNCIL IF IT VOTED TO IMPOSE THE BDS POLICY.”
Robin Margo says it's ‘a gross distortion to describe Israel as practicing apartheid’. I don’t know about that. On 16 November 2009, David Goldberg, Rabbi Emeritus of England’s Liberal Jewish Synagogue, said this in the documentary, ‘Inside Britain's Israel Lobby:’ “IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES, ISRAEL IS AN APARTHEID STATE. There is no two ways about it. When settlers travel on one road and Palestinians have to use another road; WHEN SETTLERS ARE GOVERNED BY ISRAELI LAW AND PALESTINIANS ARE GOVERNED BY MILITARY LAW, YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT APARTHEID."The trouble with bulls*** is this: when nobody believes it any more, you’re liable to look and sound pretty silly when you continue to spout it.
You listening, Robin?
On 27 July 2011, Rabbi Yosef Feldman, President of the Rabbinical Council of New South Wales, was quoted thus by The Australian Jewish News:“I really don’t understand why as soon as something of serious loshon horo (evil talk) is heard about someone of EVEN CHILD MOLESTATION should we immediately go to the secular authorities. One must go to a Rov (rabbi) who should firstly investigate the veracity of the complaint and if thought to be serious, WARN THE CULPRIT... and act in a way that could scare him by threatening him with publicity by internet to the whole community…'Warn the culprit.' Warn the child molestor. 'If you do it again we'll tell on you!' Not exactly hung, drawn and quartered and the torments of hell for your average Jewish paedophile then.
I personally feel that if we as a Jewish leadership can’t deal with this and other issues bifnim (internally) we are showing ourselves to be impotent…
If there is a grey area then WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THE JEWISH PERSPECTIVE AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE AGGRESSOR. It is not only the victim that he (the rabbi) has to think of, because in this case HE ALSO HAS TO THINK OF THE ATTACKER.”
On 30 July 2011 Anthony Horowitz said this in The Telegraph:
“OUR MORAL BANKRUPTCY IS TONY BLAIR'S LASTING LEGACY. All the pillars of the Establishment – the press, the police, the politicians – have toppled like oversized dominos. Greece may be just about bankrupt. MORALLY, I’D SAY THE UK ISN’T FAR BEHIND…Excellently well said, Mr Horowitz.
How have we reached this bottom-of-the-barrel mentality, where Sir Paul Stephenson, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, can boast that his ‘integrity is intact’ despite having accepted £12,000 of free hospitality at a health spa? Where Rebekah Brooks can say she is ‘shocked and appalled‘, but take weeks to resign? And how could anyone have actually lived with themselves, after hacking into the messages of a murdered schoolgirl?…
Who is going to sort out this mess? We have precious little hope when the chairman of the Home Affairs Committee, enjoying his moment in the limelight, is KEITH VAZ, who knows a thing or two about scandal, having OBSTRUCTED AN INQUIRY INTO HIS CONNECTIONS TO THE BILLIONAIRE HINDUJA BROTHERS, AND LATER CLAIMED £75,500 FOR A FLAT 12 MILES FROM HIS HOME.
IT ALL STARTED, OF COURSE, WITH TONY BLAIR. He wasn’t the first prime minister to kowtow to Murdoch, but in so many ways he set the trend for what is happening now. Bernie Ecclestone. The BAE bribery inquiry dropped for national security reasons. Dodgy flats in Bristol. Free holidays with millionaire pop stars. We don’t need to rehearse all these stories, because they’ve seeped into the national consciousness.
And next to Blair there was Alastair Campbell, a man as unsuited for public office in his own way as Andy Coulson was in his. Why shouldn’t Cameron follow Blair’s example and employ AN EX-TABLOID JOURNALIST WITH A FOUL MOUTH AND A REPUTATION FOR BULLYING? After all, it wasn’t going to lead to war.
With Blair… MORAL AMBIGUITY BECAME THE ORDER OF THE DAY – and if our political leaders could get away with it, so could everyone else. THE RICH AND THE POWERFUL WERE NOT ONLY IMMUNE FROM THE LAW. THEY WERE, VIA SUPER-INJUNCTIONS, PROTECTED BY IT. Public inquiries into perceived wrongdoing came to conclusions that seemed to bear little relation to the evidence.
Another knight, SIR IAN BLAIR, PRESIDED OVER THE KILLING OF AN UNARMED BRAZILIAN PLUMBER AND THE DISINFORMATION THAT FOLLOWED… Stephen Byers, before his post-government career as ‘a cab for hire‘, APPROVED THE SALE OF A NATIONAL NEWSPAPER TO A PURVEYOR OF PORNOGRAPHY. PETER MANDELSON AND DAVID BLUNKETT WERE BOTH FIRED, TWICE. And then there was Jacqui Smith…
THE NEW LABOUR YEARS CREATED AN ATMOSPHERE OF SHAMELESSNESS – AND NOW WE’RE LIVING WITH THE RESULTS. Footballers are almost expected to cheat and take drugs; stars all sleep three-in-a-bed with prostitutes. Even the royal family, in the portly shape of Prince Andrew, can be photographed cavorting with known sex offenders…
One step leads to another, and whoever took the step from pampered celebrity to murdered schoolgirl surely didn’t even distinguish between the two…
WHATEVER IS ROTTEN IN BRITAIN WAS ROTTEN A LONG TIME AGO. AFTER BLAIR, WE WERE NO LONGER ABLE TO TRUST THOSE WHO RUN THE COUNTRY. GOD HELP US IF WE CAN NO LONGER TRUST THOSE WHO HOLD THEM TO ACCOUNT.”
Much is, indeed, 'rotten' in the State. 'Who is going to sort out this mess?' Not the media, that's for sure. Not even those who write the occasional excellent article. You see, the media is bought and paid for. Even those who write excellent articles are, at some level, owned. There are truths that I'm sure you would not tell, Mr Horowitz, despite the fine moral sense implied by your article.
There are truths which you know to be true which, if the general public were allowed to know them, would incense you. For example, you will know that Rupert Murdoch has, for three decades, been the media's most powerful Zionist. He is utterly committed to Israel. Within his mighty media empire, only one local paper was allowed to speak out against the war in Iraq. Would you be happy if such information became generally known? Perhaps. But would you applaud the journalist who blew the whistle on the Neocons who were pushing for a second war with Iraq ever since the first once ended in 1991? Most of them were Jewish, you see. Which is something Rupert Murdoch and the politicians he owns are never going to tell the public.
Telling tales on those who are supposed to be off-limits is very important in respect of the 'who-is-going-to-sort-out-this-mess' conundrum. So often, you see, it is just such untouchable folk who create "the horror" and 'the tragedy' in the first place. So, Mr Horowitz, would you speak out in every instance if it helped dispel the 'atmosphere of shamelessness?'
Some do, you know. Some will condemn their fellow Jews when they behave in an asocietal way. People like the historian, Norman Finkelstein, who dares to rubbish the accepted 'Holocaust' statistics; Gilead Altmon, Nathanael Kapner and Henry Makow, all of whom speak out forcibly against all manner of Jewish depredation. And then there's Ari Shavit, the reporter, who, three weeks after the second war in Iraq began, said this in the Israeli daily, Haaretz:
"The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, MOST OF THEM JEWISH, WHO ARE PUSHING PRESIDENT BUSH TO CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY."Now would you, a Jewish gentleman, advocate the telling of such a tale? In order to help eradicate the "bottom-of-the-barrel mentality" that you, yourself, rail against here? You see, those who routinely pay attention will have known long ago that the Neocons were the prime movers behind the war in Iraq. But very few will have delved deeply enough to discover that 'most of them' were Jewish.
One last whistle I invite you to blow, Mr Horowitz. I have already mentioned that Rupert Murdoch is the world's leading media Zionist. Two separate inquiries have been set up to inquire into his media empire. On 13 July 2011, it was announced that Lord Leveson would lead the public inquiry into the phone hacking scandal, despite his having attended two parties in the previous twelve months at the home of Matthew Freud, the husband of Rupert Murdoch's daughter. Both Leveson and Freud are Jewish.
No comments:
Post a Comment